Professor Dayna Nadine Scott joined Osgoode’s faculty in 2006 after completing a SSHRC Post-Doctoral Fellowship at McGill’s Faculty of Law and a Hauser Global Research Fellowship at NYU. She is cross-appointed with the Faculty of Environmental Studies. Professor Scott’s teaching is in administrative law, environmental law and justice, risk regulation, and international environmental governance. She recently completed a SSHRC-funded research project in partnership with environmental justice activists from the Aamjiwnaang First Nation, near Sarnia`s Chemical Valley, which tackled the issue of chronic pollution on an Ontario reserve. The project applied a critical, feminist perspective to the examination of law’s treatment of the risks of long-term, low-dose exposures to pollutants.
A current SSHRC-funded project with Professor Gus Van Harten (“Investigating Regulatory Chill”) examines the contemporary constraints on regulation to protect the environment, with a focus on investor rights in the resource extraction context.
Professor Scott’s publications cover topics from environmental justice activism and experiential knowledge, to contested resource extraction, to the challenges posed for law and environmental health by the emerging endocrine disruption thesis. She is interested in questions of environmental regulation and governance from an interdisciplinary perspective, especially work that interrogates the interaction between local and global modes of governing and ways of knowing.
Professor Scott is the editor of Our Chemical Selves: Gender, Toxics and Environmental Health (UBC Press, 2015) and the past Director of the National Network on Environments and Women`s Health. Among other awards, Professor Scott has been a recipient of Fulbright and SSHRC Fellowships, and the Law Commission of Canada’s “Audacity of Imagination” Prize.Recent publications explore the tactics of activists resisting tar sands extraction in Peace River Alberta (“‘We are the Monitors Now’: Experiential Knowledge, Transcorporeality and Environmental Justice” (2015) in Social & Legal Studies), and a Comment on the Idle No More movement published in the Canadian Journal of Law & Society, The Forces that Conspire to Keep us ‘Idle’.
Industry Expertise (2)
Areas of Expertise (5)
Osgoode Hall Law School: Ph.D., Law
York University: M.E.S., Faculty of Environmental Studies
Osgoode Hall Law School: LL.B, Law
- York University Faculty of Environmental Studies : Associate Professor
Media Appearances (3)
Why B.C. must reject the Northern Gateway review
The Globe and Mail online
Back in the summer of 2012, Premier Christy Clark boldly laid down five conditions that would need to be met for British Columbia to give its support to an oil sands pipeline. The first condition is the successful completion of the formal environmental review process. The second and third conditions relate to practices for spills in water and on land. The fourth involves respecting the rights of First Nations, and the fifth requires that British Columbians receive economic benefits commensurate with the risks involved...
Canada needs a national energy strategy
The Hill Times online
It may seem like a measure of economic desperation that while municipal politicians across the country are fighting to keep their citizens protected from toxic emissions, Mike Bradley, the long-time mayor of Sarnia, has raised his hand to say, “Bring it on.”
As pundits, national unions, and the NDP bemoan the fact that our emerging national energy strategy does not seem to contemplate actually refining the crude here in Canada, but simply “exporting jobs,” Bradley has publicly put his city forward as a key destination.
His message is that Sarnia’s refineries, and highly-connected system of infrastructure, provides an easier alternative for getting oil sands crude to market than the proposed Northern Gateway or even Keystone XL.
We need to thank Bradley for bringing Sarnia rightfully into the middle of this brouhaha because what has been happening in Sarnia, and to its close neighbour the Aamjiwnaang First Nation, demonstrates perfectly that the pipeline decisions we are currently contemplating have real distributive consequences.
Beyond BPA: We need to get tough on toxics
Globe and Mail print
Did you breathe a sigh of relief when Canada became the first jurisdiction in the world to declare bisphenol A (commonly known as BPA) toxic in 2010? OR when it banned the chemical in baby bottles, prompting many manufacturers to remove it from their products?
We inhale, ingest and absorb a litany of synthetic chemicals into our bodies every day, and improving scientific detection methods are making our toxic “body burdens” increasingly obvious.
Event Appearances (1)
Expert Testimony to the House of Commons Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development
Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development Review of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act Ottawa
Research Grants (1)
Reconciling Soveriegnties: New Techniques for 'Authoring' Extraction on Indigenous Territories
SSHRC Partnership Development Grant
The aim of this collaboration is to advance understandings of the ways in which complex new economic and financial techniques are shaping contemporary politics of resource extraction and the expression of sovereignties in Canada. There is a widespread sense across the country that heightened uncertainties around Aboriginal title, (re)assertions of Indigenous laws, and claims of inherent jurisdiction are
presenting a major concern for business and investors in the resource sectors. Parties are mired in costly
litigation, and disruptions occur as Indigenous communities seek meaningful consultation, better
environmental protection, and more control over decisions. As attaining project approvals through
established channels becomes increasingly complicated and bogged down in protracted regulatory
proceedings, new techniques for maintaining access and gaining consent for resource development
projects are emerging by necessity.
We are a collection of scholars and organizations that seek to test new partnership approaches for the
study of these emerging economic and financial techniques for maintaining access to lands and
resources, conceptualized as forms of 'sovereignty management'. Specifically, we are interested in
exploring whether cross-disciplinary approaches combining insights from, primarily, socio-legal studies
and critical geographies, are productive for uncovering the significance of a variety of new economic
and financialization measures. We have observed that new tools are emerging, in various places and
sectors, and in various forms, and we wish to collaborate to better understand the effects of these
techniques and measures on expressions of Indigenous sovereignty in relation to decision-making about
contested plans for resource extraction and energy generation.
In this article, we report findings on whether trade and investment agreements that allow for investor–state dispute settlement (ISDS) contribute to regulatory chill. The study focused on whether ISDS contributed to changes in internal vetting of government ...
Residents of pollution hotspots often take on projects in 'citizen science', or popularepidemiology, in an effort to marshal the data that can prove their experience of the pollution to the relevant authorities. Sometimes these tactics, such as pollution logs or ...
Osgoode Hall Law School Professor Dayna Scott employs the concept of "networked infrastructures" drawn from the literature in critical geography to reveal the environmental justice implications of the coast-to-coast crude oil network that is currently being contemplated in Canada. Her talk was delivered on January 30, 2013 as part of the Osgoode Faculty Research Seminar Series...
Last winter, Canada witnessed a series of spontaneous and coordinated actions by Indigenous activists seeking to demonstrate solidarity with the hunger strike of Chief Teresa Spence of Attawapiskat. The actions, initially prompted by the Twitter meme# IdleNoMore, ...