Experts Matter. Find Yours.
Connect for media, speaking, professional opportunities & more.
Pope Leo XIII was known as the "Pope of the East." He was actually listening to many of the patriarchs at the time who were opposed to a lot of the colonization that was happening—and Latinization. So, in my mind, it's notable that one of Pope Leo XIV's first addresses was to the Eastern Catholic Churches and that his first papal visit was to celebrate the 1700th anniversary of Nicaea [an ecumenical council that was among the first efforts to attain theological consensus among Christians]. To me, it signals his recognition of the concentric circles of unity that are needed. First of all, we Catholics have to figure out our own unity. But then what does it mean to be in right relationship with Churches that have equal dignity in terms of their apostolic heritage and have drifted away for historical reasons? I think Pope Leo XIV is trying to listen to the cry of our generation, and younger generations, and help us all discern what is the right response.
Leo XIII had followed St. Augustine in saying that there can be no peace, except peace understood as a "tranquility of order," where order means that all things are ordered according to the will of Christ. What Leo XIII thought we needed to do is to find that and try to order our individual lives and our lives as a Church, so that the world can live in peace. Leo XIV also picks up on themes like that a lot. His first words on the on the loggia on May 8, 2025, were, "Peace be with you all!" And he keeps coming back to that, time after time, understanding that peace isn't just the absence of conflict. Peace is things being rightly ordered, and "rightly ordered" means a world in which people love each other, including through law and politics.
There are a few big themes, the first being migration. Pope Leo XIII saw emigration, which was actually forbidden by the Church, as an opportunity to build a new idea of the Church and extend its influence on the international scale. He took a really important stand to defend migrants, especially Italian migrants, at the time of the Great Italian Immigration, because he saw them as missionaries who could bring their faith to the United States. Pope Leo XIV carries that same instinct—he sees immigrants not as a plight, but rather as an opportunity to make contact with new worlds.From the European perspective, the commercial expansion of the U.S. and its westward growth was viewed with some fear during Leo XIII's papacy. Leo XIII again viewed this expansion as an opportunity, and he oversaw the establishment of new dioceses from Kansas westward in the U.S. He praised the development and mission of the American Church while also recognizing the hesitations many had about the new world. Leo XIV also has somewhat of a mixed relationship with the United States. He grew up in the U.S. but primarily lived in Peru, so he observed the U.S. from the outside and has a critical lens of the country. He recognizes both the insider and outsider perspective of the U.S.
Across much of the Caribbean, the collapse of the Maduro regime has been met with a restrained but unmistakable sense of relief. Yet beneath the diplomatic restraint lies a shared understanding: for small island states that have absorbed the spillover effects of Venezuelan collapse for more than two decades, this moment represents the possible end of a long and destabilizing chapter. Migration pressures were immediate. By 2025, nearly seven million Venezuelan refugees and migrants were living in Latin America and the Caribbean. While mainland countries absorbed the largest absolute numbers, Caribbean islands faced some of the most intense per-capita impacts. Trinidad and Tobago hosted an estimated 45,000 to more than 70,000 Venezuelans in a population of roughly 1.5 million, placing sustained strain on schools, healthcare access, housing markets, and immigration systems. Against this backdrop, it is unsurprising that the end of the Maduro regime has been quietly welcomed. This moment also invites a reassessment of China’s expanding footprint in the Caribbean. Over the past decade, Beijing has deepened its presence through port infrastructure, telecommunications, energy projects, concessional lending, and diplomatic engagement, often filling financing gaps when Western attention appeared episodic. The emerging environment is one of recalibration rather than rupture. Caribbean governments are navigating a landscape in which external engagement is becoming more consequential, not less. Geography has not changed, but expectations have.What to watch nextAs this transition unfolds, several policy developments will determine whether cautious optimism proves warranted.First, whether Venezuelan outward migration to the Caribbean measurably slows. Sustained declines or credible pathways for voluntary return would be the clearest indicator that conditions inside Venezuela are stabilizing.Second, whether Caribbean public systems receive durable support rather than short-term humanitarian fixes. Education, healthcare, housing, and immigration systems absorbed migration pressures for years; meaningful relief will require budget support and institutional strengthening, not emergency framing alone .Third, whether organized crime and drug trafficking pressures in the Caribbean basin begin to ease.Finally, whether the region avoids a return to dependency-driven energy and infrastructure politics.For the Caribbean, hope today is not naïve. It is conditional. The Chávez–Maduro years imposed real costs on the region. Maduro’s end creates an opening for an intriguing turn in the historic relations with the US, the region’s most important economic partner.