Featured Post from University of Delaware

March Madness underdogs: People are riskier in gambles, forecasts made later in a sequence

Mar 12, 2024

1 min

Jackie Silverman


New research suggests that those who get hit with the annual case of March Madness are more likely to take a chance on lower seeds for matchups they happen to fill out within their brackets later on, rather than first.


Jackie Silverman, assistant professor of marketing, co-authored a study in Management Science that found people are more risk seeking (more likely to predict a relatively improbable outcome) in their later forecasts and are thus more likely to make an incorrect prediction for them. For instance, individuals were more likely to bet that an “underdog” team will win in a sports tournament for predictions they made third, versus first, in a series of forecasts.


There can be negative consequences for this "prediction order effect"; by choosing the less likely option in these later predictions, people face greater chances of being wrong, which can reduce earnings and happiness.


These results are likely to extend beyond gambling to other cases where people must make multiple forecasts, including decisions made by investors (who must make several predictions of how stocks will perform) and managers (who must forecast potential employees' performance before making hiring decisions).


To arrange an interview with Silverman, visit her profile and click on the contact button or send a message to our media relations team.

Connect with:
Jackie Silverman

Jackie Silverman

Assistant Professor, Marketing

Prof. Silverman's research examines several facets of judgment and decision making and consumer psychology.

Prosocial ActionsConsumer PsychologyMarketingDecision MakingJudgement

You might also like...

Check out some other posts from University of Delaware

2 min

Aging in context: Why culture matters in discussions on menopause

How do we age? Why do we age? And why are experiences of menopause and midlife so different across cultures? These are the driving questions behind the work of Melissa Melby, a medical anthropologist and professor at the University of Delaware. For more than 25 years, Melby has been exploring how biology and culture intersect to shape the way people experience aging and menopause. Her new book, Reframing Aging: Insights from Biology and Culture of Midlife Japanese, introduces a biocultural framework that goes beyond the “what” of aging to ask both how (the immediate mechanisms) and why (the deeper evolutionary reasons) we age and experience menopause the way we do. By weaving together insights from evolutionary biology, anthropology, medicine and lived experience, Melby challenges what many consider to be the “normal” path of midlife. Her research highlights how cultural expectations, medical practices, social structures and lifestyle habits can profoundly influence not just how symptoms are treated – but how they are perceived in the first place. What may be pathologized in one society could be understood as a natural stage of life in another. As conversations around women’s health, longevity and healthy aging gain overdue attention, Melby’s cross-disciplinary expertise offers journalists a fresh lens for exploring some of the most universal – and misunderstood – aspects of human life. For stories that bridge science, culture and health, Melby provides a rare perspective: one that reframes aging and menopause not as fixed biological destinies, but as experiences shaped by the complex interplay of our bodies, histories, and communities. Reporters interested in speaking to Melby can email mediarelations@udel.edu.

2 min

Study finds widespread duplication of local television news

Viewers of "local" TV news in nearly 40% of markets nationwide are hearing the exact same thing found on a competitor’s channel, according to a new study co-authored by the University of Delaware's Danilo Yanich. This widespread word-for-word duplication could have major implications on local journalism and newscasts, which are a source of critical information for millions of Americans. Yanich and fellow UD researcher Benjamin E. Bagozzi analyzed three months of local TV news broadcasts from 861 stations nationwide — more than 400,000 programs in all. Using a high bar for what counts as duplication (at least half of the content being word-for-word identical, excluding sports, weather and ads), they found widespread story sharing. Other findings: In many cases, two stations in the same city aired nearly identical newscasts night after night. • Duplication is driven by service agreements and the gobbling up of stations by groups such as Nexstar, Gray, News-Press and Gazette and Sinclair. • Stations with service agreements had duplication rates twice as high as those that were simply co-owned. • Smaller markets were more likely to have these overlaps. In some cases, two stations in the same city aired nearly identical newscasts night after night. • The duplication usually happened within the same geographic market (86% of cases) rather than between different regions. On average, these station pairs had identical content 65% of the time. • Local TV remains America’s most trusted news source. Over three-quarters of Americans say they trust it more than newspapers, radio or online news. “In any other context, this would be plagiarism,” said Yanich, noting that he and Bagozzi intentionally examined stations over 91 days to cover a body of content large enough to provide meaningful results. The study’s authors stress that while consolidation may make financial sense for station owners, it raises important questions about the future of local journalism. If more and more markets see their “local” stations airing the same news, communities may lose the independent voices that help keep citizens informed and hold local leaders accountable. To reach Yanich directly and arrange an interview, visit his profile and click on the "contact" button. Email MediaRelations@udel.edu to set up an interview with Bagozzi.

2 min

University of Delaware secures $13.1M grant to transform Alzheimer’s research and prevention

A new five-year $13.1 million grant will greatly expand the ability of University of Delaware researchers to pursue ways to prevent and treat Alzheimer's disease. The gift from the Delaware Community Foundation (DCF) is one of the largest in state history for Alzheimer’s research. UD's Christopher Martens called the grant "transformational," as it will support the expansion of a statewide prevention study, enable the purchase of a state-of-the-art MRI machine and drive discovery of new diagnostic tools and treatments. “It will also help grow the number of researchers in Delaware focused on Alzheimer’s disease, promoting an interdisciplinary approach." said Martens, director of UD's Delaware Center for Cognitive Aging Research (DECCAR) and professor of kinesiology and applied physiology in the College of Health Sciences. Bringing together researchers from multiple fields to collaborate on a critical challenge like Alzheimer’s disease is a key strength of the University of Delaware, said Interim President Laura Carlson. “Every one of us has a family member or friend who has been deeply affected by Alzheimer’s. I’m proud that UD is working better to understand this terrible disease and partnering with others throughout the state to work on its prevention, diagnosis and treatment,” Carlson said. “We are grateful to the Delaware Community Foundation for their support, which allows us to escalate our research and expand our community outreach.” “No one has to look very far afield to witness and understand the tragedy of Alzheimer’s, and the research supported by this grant will help UD researchers come ever-closer to uncovering life-improving and life-saving solutions,” said Stuart Comstock-Gay, President and CEO of the Delaware Community Foundation (DCF). “The grant was provided through the generosity of late Paul H. Boerger, who made a substantial legacy gift to the fund he had established at the DCF in his lifetime, and his foresight will help so many.” The gift is aimed at achieving the following goals: • Tracking Alzheimer’s risk over time – Expanding Delaware’s largest study of brain aging from 100 to 500 participants to uncover who develops dementia and why. • A simple blood test for early detection – Developing a first-of-its-kind test that could diagnose Alzheimer’s years earlier than current methods. • Cutting-edge brain imaging – Installing a $3.2 million MRI machine on UD’s STAR Campus to reveal hidden brain changes linked to memory loss. • Spotting the earliest warning signs – Exploring how subtle shifts in language and menopause-related hormone changes may predict Alzheimer’s risk. • Fueling prevention and cures – Creating powerful data and tools that will accelerate new treatments and bring researchers closer to stopping Alzheimer’s. To reach Martens for an interview, visit his profile and click on the "contact" button. Interviews with DCF officials can be arranged by emailing MediaRelations@udel.edu.

View all posts
Powered by