Alexandra Lahav is an expert in complex litigation, class actions, and mass torts. She is the author of a prize winning book, In Praise of Litigation (Oxford University Press 2017) and popular casebook on civil procedure.
Areas of Expertise (6)
Harvard Law School: J.D. 1998
Brown University: B.A., History 1993
Branstetter New Voices in Civil Justice Workshop (professional)
Awarded by the Vanderbilt Law School.
Zacharias Prize in Professional Responsibility (professional)
Awarded by the Association of American Law Schools
Media Appearances (8)
J&J Called a 'Kingpin' in Opioid Case That Could Be a Test for 1,600 More Lawsuits
“Public nuisance claims are somewhat adventuresome,” notes Alexandra Lahav of the University of Connecticut School of Law. “It’s not an area that has been well litigated. So whenever you have a public nuisance claim, you are always striking new ground. That’s more opportunity, but it also means it’s hard to predict for us looking from the outside what this judge is going to do.”
Purdue Pharma agrees to $270 million settlement in Oklahoma opioid case
Avoiding the trial with a settlement relieves immediate pressure on Purdue to seek bankruptcy protection, said Alexandra Lahav, a professor at the University of Connecticut School of Law.
While the company has not ruled out a bankruptcy filing, it now plans to focus on attempting a settlement with other state and local governments pursuing similar cases, a person familiar with Purdue’s deliberations said.
Bayer Levels Sights On Weedkiller Verdict
Wall Street Journal print
Bayer AG is stepping up the legal defense of its flagship weedkiller, after a recent verdict in a case alleging the chemical causes cancer sent shares down sharply and raised the prospect of costly plaintiff payouts.
"For Bayer, the most important thing is to have a judge say the [plaintiff's] science doesn't hold up," Alexandra Lahav, a law professor at the University of Connecticut, said in reference to the Roundup case.
Facing Wave of Opioid Lawsuits, Drug Companies Sprinkle Charity on Hard-Hit Areas
The drug industry is dishing out millions in grants and donations to organizations in cities, counties and states that have sued the companies over the deadly U.S. opioid epidemic.
Alexandra Lahav, a University of Connecticut School of Law professor, said the contributions could be a tactic in settlement talks or discussions with regulators, and while the donations wouldn’t be applied dollar-for-dollar in a settlement agreement, they show goodwill on the part of the company.
Monsanto Roundup appeal has uphill climb on 'junk science' grounds: legal experts
Bayer AG unit Monsanto faces long odds on an appeal blaming an “inflamed” jury and “junk science” for a verdict of $289 million in damages to a man who said the company’s Roundup weed killer caused his cancer, according to some legal experts.
Monsanto said the plaintiff’s experts should have been excluded because although they mainly cited respected, peer-reviewed studies, they inappropriately cherry-picked results and used unreliable methods to support the position that glysophate causes cancer in humans.
But Alexandra Lahav, a law professor at the University of Connecticut, said it was common for experts to rely on the same studies and reach different conclusions to present to a jury during trial.
Exxon Sues the Suers in Fierce Climate-Change Case
Bloomberg Businessweek online
As climate-change lawsuits against the oil industry mount, Exxon Mobil Corp. is taking a bare-knuckle approach rarely seen in legal disputes: It’s going after the lawyers who are suing it.
The company has targeted at least 30 people and organizations, including the attorneys general of New York and Massachusetts, hitting them with suits, threats of suits or demands for sworn depositions.
Hillary Clinton says Bernie Sanders wants higher standards for toy guns than real guns
"A hypothetical situation might be if a city experienced an epidemic of deaths or injuries that resulted from a prevalence of realistic-looking toy guns; think of the recent story of Tamir Rice, a Cleveland child carrying a toy gun who a police officer shot and killed, said Alexandra Lahav, a professor of civil procedure at the University of Connecticut School of Law. In that case, a city might want to bring a suit against the toy gun manufacturer or seller for creating a public nuisance. But under the 2005 law, a city cannot sue a gun company if there is an epidemic of people being injured or killed by their guns."
ACLU family separation case highlights alternate path for Trump challengers
Law professor Alexandra Lahav of the University of Connecticut, a class action procedure expert, told me that civil rights advocates have been relied on sweeping class action injunctions to challenge state and federal policies since before the modern federal rules of procedure for class actions were adopted in 1966. In fact, according to a post Lahav and three other law profs wrote for the Harvard Law Review last month, the class action rules were drafted with these cases in mind, “to address precisely the scenario where a government policy systematically denies a group of plaintiffs a meaningful opportunity to vindicate their rights.”
Due process challenges against government agencies – exactly like the ACLU’s family separation case – have been considered particularly appropriate for sweeping class action treatment, the profs wrote, because “they often raise generic questions about how uniform hearing procedures impact a group of people who depend on them for relief.”
To what extent should procedural law take into account the resources of participants in the legal system? The assumption in the United States is that the legal system does not require symmetry between litigants. Courts take litigants as they find them. There are at least three exceptions to this general rule: the provision of an attorney by the state in certain limited circumstances, fee shifting in the ...
How should due process doctrine constrain the class action device and other forms of aggregate litigation that look and feel like class actions? Since courts' conceptions of due process determine the scope of collective litigation, this short Essay considers these conceptions of due process and asks what ought they be. Its main contribution is to demonstrate how conceptions of due process ...
Are class actions unconstitutional? Many people—defendants and conservative legislators, not to mention scholars at the American Enterprise Institute—would like them to be. For opponents of the class action, Martin Redish's book Wholesale Justice* provides some of the most theoretically sophisticated arguments available. The book is a major contribution both to the scholarly literature on class ...
That like cases ought to be treated alike is a basic common law principle. Judges recognize that consistency in case outcomes is a characteristic of the rule of law. 2 Yet our civil justice system tolerates a great 2. See, eg, Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker, 128 S. Ct. 2605, 2624-26 (2008)(lamenting unpredictability in punitive damages awards); Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp., 546 US 132, 139 (2005) ...
Class actions present a series of dualities. There are two dominant views of the class action's structure and two dominant views of the class action lawyer. Some see the class action as an aggregation of individuals, a complex joinder device and nothing more. Others view the class action as transforming the class members into an entity. Similarly, there are two dominant views of the class action lawyer ...