Bethany Lacina

Associate Professor of Political Science University of Rochester

  • Rochester NY

Bethany Lacina is an expert in civil and ethnic conflict.

Contact

University of Rochester

View more experts managed by University of Rochester

Areas of Expertise

Migration
International Relations
Territorial Autonomy
Civil Conflict
Ethnic Conflict
Comparative Politics
Ethnic Politics

Social

Biography

Bethany Lacina researches international relations, comparative politics, migration, ethnic politics, and civil conflict. Current research examines how governments manage threats to internal security by studying the history of separatist and language conflicts in India. She is also writing papers on migration and civil violence and cross-national correlates of civil war.

She is co-author of a dataset on battle deaths in state-based armed conflicts, housed at the International Peace Research Institute, Oslo.

Education

Yale University

B.A

Ethics, Politics, and Economics

2002

Stanford University

Ph.D

Political Science

2011

Affiliations

  • PRIO Battle Deaths Data

Selected Media Appearances

Is ‘Wakanda Forever’ too ‘woke’ for Marvel’s own good? That’s what some critics argue. Let’s look at the numbers.

Washington Post  online

2022-11-11

Analysis by Bethany Lacina, Nicholas Carnes and Lilly J. Goren - As one of us (Bethany Lacina) has shown, the MCU has long been more popular among Americans of color than White Americans — although MCU films are more popular than similar blockbusters with every racial demographic group.

View More

Spurred by the Supreme Court, a Nation Divides Along a Red-Blue Axis

New York Times  

2022-07-02

Gun rights laws like the protections for silencers in Texas “are edging back toward the idea of nullification, that states should be able to ignore federal law, an idea that grew directly out of slavery,” said Bethany Lacina, a University of Rochester political scientist who studies federalism in different countries. “But you can imagine a day where there’s a federal ban on abortion, and the governor of California says, ‘Eh, we’re just not going to do that.’ It’s all very double-edged weapons.”

View More

Analysis | Nearly all NFL head coaches are White. What are the odds?

Washington Post  print

2022-02-10

By Bethany Lacina - It's either a 100 to 1 chance -- or there's a pro-White bias in hiring, my research finds.

View More

Show All +

Selected Articles

Periphery versus periphery: The stakes of separatist war

The Journal of Politics

Bethany Lacina

2015

Center versus periphery distributional conflict is the standard explanation for separatist war. However, many separatists face strong opposition from other groups in their area. The likelihood of separatist war depends on the center’s political relationships with competing groups in the periphery. This article demonstrates two patterns in separatist war onset worldwide at the ethnic group level. Groups with a political advantage in the capital relative to their regional neighbors are less likely to have grievances about local political and economic institutions and have a lower probability of separatist war. On the other hand, ethnic groups that share territory with the most powerful ethnic group in their country are deterred from separatist violence. The center’s commitment to defend the regional status quo is particularly credible. Given the importance of within-periphery rivalries to separatist war, policy interventions designed to resolve center/periphery resource conflict may be ineffective against violence.

View more

The effects of weather-induced migration on sons of the soil riots in India

World Politics

Rikhil R Bhavnani, Bethany Lacina

2015

Migration is thought to cause sons of the soil conflict, particularly if natives tend to be unemployed. Using data from India, the authors investigate the causal effect of domestic migration on riots by instrumenting for migration using weather shocks in migrants’ places of origin. They find a direct effect of migration on riots, but do not find that this effect is larger in places with more native unemployment. They argue and find evidence that migration is less likely to cause rioting where the host population is politically aligned with the central government. Politically privileged host populations can appease nativists and reduce migration through means that are less costly than rioting. Without these political resources, hosts resort to violence. Beyond furthering the sons of the soil literature, the authors detail a political mechanism linking natural disasters and, possibly, climate change and environmental degradation to riots, and demonstrate a widely applicable strategy for recovering the causal effect of migration on violence.

View more

Who opposes ethnic territorial autonomy?

Social Science Research Network

Bethany Lacina

2016

Ethnoterritorial autonomy is typically studied through outcomes like decentralization or war. The microfoundations of ethnoterritorial politics, such as position taking by individual central actors, are rarely observed. I use Indian parliamentary records to code legislators’ stances on dozens of proposals for ethnic self-rule. I consider three explanations of government opposition to autonomy—the economic value of territories at stake; central nationalism; and regional ethnic rivalries—alone and interacted with pro-autonomy violence. Regional ethnic rivalries play the clearest role; the core opposition to an autonomy demand was representatives of other ethnic groups in the same area. Legislators were also more averse to autonomy for religious minority areas. Interestingly, this pattern held even among MP’s whose own constituency was not majority Hindu. Opposition did not increase with the development or natural resources of a proposed autonomous territory. This unique study of legislative behavior suggests new hypotheses about government reactions to ethnoterritorial movements.

View more

Show All +