Charli Carpenter
Professor of Political Science and Director of Human Security Lab University of Massachusetts Amherst
- Amherst MA
Charli Carpenter's teaching and research interests include the protection of civilians, laws of war and humanitarian affairs.
University of Massachusetts Amherst
View more experts managed by University of Massachusetts Amherst
Expertise
Biography
She has a particular interest in the gap between intentions and outcomes among advocates of human security.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Carpenter has written and commented extensively on the travel ban imposed on civilian men by the Ukrainian government.
Social Media
Video
Education
University of Oregon
Ph.D.
Political Science
Select Recent Media Coverage
A father’s love, a daughter’s freedom
The Christian Science Monitor
2024-07-24
A new study led by Charli Carpenter, professor of political science and director of the UMass Amherst Human Security Lab, shows that while most people in Afghanistan support human rights for Afghan women, fathers of single daughters are especially likely to support women’s rights when primed to think about the gender of their eldest child.
Warts and All, International Law Is Still Better Than No Law
Bloomberg online
2023-11-16
Charli Carpenter, director of the Human Security Lab and professor of political science, is quoted in a commentary on international law in the context of the Israel-Hamas war. However imperfect, international law helps to distinguish “between ‘civilized’ violence and outright barbarity,” Carpenter says.
‘It’s hard to conceive of this as anything other than like a death march’: Local experts decry forced displacement of Gazans
The Boston Globe print
2023-10-14
Charli Carpenter, political science and legal studies, is among the local experts commenting on risks from relocating Palestinians in Gaza. “It’s simply not possible to move 1 million people on foot in 24 hours. The attempt to do so will cause trampling, crowding, accidents, severe deprivation, exposure, and a crowding that will exacerbate risk of disease,” Carpenter said.
Ukraine’s Male Travel Ban and the Protection of Civilians in Wartime
War & Peace Podcast online
2023-07-12
This week on War & Peace, Olga Oliker and Elissa Jobson speak with Charli Carpenter, director of the Human Security Lab at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, about the perception and the gendered effects of Ukraine’s male travel ban and ways for better protecting civilians in wartime.
Ukrainians express worries over conscription following Russia's invasion
NPR radio
2022-08-15
Not only is conscription not voluntary, the exceptions have been suspended under martial law and a travel ban put in place that prevents most men between the ages of 18 and 60 from leaving the country, effectively trapping them inside Ukraine. Charli Carpenter is the head of the Human Security Lab at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, which recently surveyed thousands of Ukrainians about the travel ban. A majority said they do not support requiring men to stay.
The challenges to prosecuting rape as a war crime in Ukraine, as allegations arise against Russia
WBUR radio
2022-05-03
Ukraine's prosecutor general, Iryna Venediktova, claims that thousands of war crimes have been committed by Russian forces all over Ukraine, including acts of sexual violence. Charli Carpenter, professor of political science at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, discusses the challenges of prosecuting rape and other sexual crimes used as weapons of war.
Select Publications
The Rules-Based Order Is Less Dependent on the U.S. Than Biden’s Critics Think
World Politics ReviewCharli Carpenter
2025-01-14
Charli Carpenter, professor of political science, writes that international rules-based order is less dependent on the United States than critics of President Joe Biden believe.
A New Front Just Opened in the Campaign Against Nuclear Weapons
World Politics ReviewCharli Carpenter
2024-06-18
"...It may seem contradictory that nuclear spending, nuclear saber-rattling and reassertive nuclear policies appear to be on the rise, just five years after the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons came into force, banning the use or threatened use of such weapons. But in some respects this is to be expected. The “nuclear taboo” has always been a taboo on the use, not the possession, of nuclear weapons, and it has co-existed uneasily with the acceptance of a world in which the possession of nuclear weapons—at least by certain states—remains a reality."
2023 Wasn’t All Bad News for Human Security
World Politics ReviewCharli Carpenter
2024-01-03
"As 2023 drew to a close, it was easy to feel like the world was trending in the wrong direction. Climate change is getting worse, and world governments have done precious little to stop it. Refugee crises have proliferated, even as unfounded distrust of foreigners is also on the rise. Authoritarianism is on the march, with freedom indicators continuing to slide, while reproductive health is facing a global backlash and trust in political institutions is dangerously low. The war in Ukraine is rumbling on, while the outbreak of war in Gaza has taken such a human toll that Christmas in Bethlehem—seen as the birthplace of Jesus by the Christian faithful—was canceled entirely this year...."
Zelensky’s Travel Ban on Ukrainian Men Could Damage War Morale
Foreign Policy2022-11-14
Shortly after Russia invaded Ukraine in February, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky declared martial law and submitted a notice to the United Nations announcing his intention to derogate from his country’s obligations under various human rights treaties for the necessity of national security. Among these derogations was the right to freedom of movement: Ukraine implemented a travel ban that restricts most men ages 18 to 60 from leaving the country.
Civilian Men Are Trapped in Ukraine
Foreign PolicyCharli Carpenter
2022-07-15
On July 5, Ukrainian army generals issued a proclamation dramatically expanding the martial law prohibiting Ukrainian civilian men’s freedom of movement, calling on all those “liable for military service” to remain in their home districts.
When Foreign Policy Went Wrong: How to Spot a Bad Concept When You See It.
Foreign Policy2021-01-12
In US foreign policy, it isn't always easy to suss out good ideas from bad. Some bad ideas masquerade as neutral fact, only to be exposed later on. Others worm their way into strategic doctrines, guiding a wide range of policies that long outlast the original thought. Good ideas, meanwhile, can have bad effects--and bad ideas can be used for good. Given this tangle, picking the worst foreign-policy ideas of the last 50 years may seem like knitting socks with fish line. But it's not impossible.
The U.S. Is Breaking the Law on the Southern Border
World Politics ReviewCharli Carpenter
2021-07-23
Over the past few weeks, activists led by former border patrol agent turned refugee advocate Jenn Budd gathered at Fort Bliss military base outside El Paso, Texas, to protest the continued detention of children, many of them unaccompanied, in crowded conditions while they await asylum hearings. The protests are a continuation of direct action sparked off two summers ago by then-President Donald Trump’s draconian immigration policies, which included forcing immigrants to await asylum hearings in the dangerous city of Juarez, Mexico, rather than in El Paso; separating children from their parents or guardians upon detention, while deporting 1,400 parents back to their countries of origin without their children; and holding immigrants that made it across the border in crowded, inhumane conditions that fit the historical definition of “concentration camps”—internment centers where targeted groups are detained without trial or administrative proceedings.
Breaking bad? How survey experiments prime Americans for war crimes
Perspectives on Politics2020-11-03
What affects Americans’ sensitivity to international laws and norms on the use of force? A wealth of recent IR literature tackles this question through experimental surveys using fictional scenarios and treatments to explore precisely when Americans would approve of government policies that would violate the laws of war. We test whether such survey experiments may themselves be affecting public sensitivity to these norms—or even Americans’ understanding of the content of the norms themselves.
