Christopher J. Cormier profile photo

Christopher J. Cormier

Associate Professor Loyola Marymount University

  • Los Angeles CA

christopher.cormier@lmu.edu

Contact
Loyola Marymount University logo

Loyola Marymount University

View more experts managed by Loyola Marymount University

Media

Biography

Dr. Christopher J. Cormier is a former special education teacher and an Associate Professor of teaching and learning in the School of Education at Loyola Marymount University. He has taught first through 12th in Title 1 schools in the Greater Los Angeles Metropolitan area. His research program focuses on the social and cultural contexts of minoritized learners and teachers in special education. Under this overarching theme, he has two lines of scholarship. The first is on the professional and socio-emotional lives of minoritized teachers. The second is on culturally informed identification of minoritized students in special education. Dr. Cormier brings a comparative lens to both of his research lines with studies in national and international contexts. He has served as the President of the Division for Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Exceptional Learners (DDEL) of the Council for Exceptional Children and was a Director-at-Large for Kappa Delta Pi Incorporated.

Current research projects include the following:

•Special education teacher burnout, stress, and mental health, and how it changes over the school year.

•The experiences of children with disabilities and their families in the Christian church (documentary in production).

Education

Stanford University

Postdoctoral Research Fellow

University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

PhD

Special Education

Pepperdine University

MAEd w/emphasis in Psychology

Areas of Expertise

Education Policy
Equity in Education
History of Education
International and Comparative Education
Psychchology
Race and Ethnicity
Sociology
Special Education
Teachers and Teaching

Industry Expertise

Education/Learning
Research
Public Policy

Affiliations

  • Council for Exceptional Children
  • American Educational Research Association
  • The Authors Guild

Media Appearances

Dr. Phil Show

Paramount Studios  tv

2022-12-20

Learning Loss During Lockdown: Are There Solutions?

Courses

Research in Transformative Education

EDTL 6618

Context of Schooling

EDUR 6102

Justice, Equity, Diversity, & Inclusion in Education

EDUR 6002

Articles

The IEP is a joke: An analysis of the IDEA's cultural erasure and the legal barriers it creates (in press)

Southern University Law Review

Cormier, C.J, & Hori, P.

2026-06-17

The United States’ Individualized Education Program (IEP) dates back to the Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975 (EHA), which was later reauthorized in 1990 by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and its subsequent amendments in 1997 and 2004. While IEPs have been a cornerstone of special education programs for the last fifty years, they are problematic for several reasons. In theory, IEPs are intended to individualize academic instruction for students with disabilities; however, the program’s issues make it a joke and ultimately a failure for minoritized students. Similar to the rap group Public Enemy’s hit single 911 Is a Joke, which highlighted slow and inadequate emergency response in predominately Black neighborhoods, IEPs—both the documents themselves and related processes—negatively impact students and families of color disproportionately. The goal, therefore, of this article is to contextualize the non-useful aspects of the IEP as it relates to minoritized students. First, we will contest the legal intent of the IDEA while simultaneously discussing why, like 911, IEPs fail to adequately serve students of color. Second, we will illustrate how IEPs are culturally irrelevant and lack cultural responsivity. Specifically, we will discuss the challenges created due to IEPs’ design; they do not consider the unique cultural needs of minoritized families and what they can do to support their child’s education. This ultimately harms these families and, most importantly, minoritized students. Furthermore, it is antithetical to the original goals of special education programs, which included detailed aspects of parental support. Third, and finally, we will reveal how judicial interpretation approaches used in the special education context hinder the IDEA and result in IEPs that do not adequately serve and support minoritized students. Implications for practice and policy will also be explored.

Teacher intrapersonal and school organizational health predictors of special education teacher burnout (in press)

Exceptionality

Ruble, L. A., Cormier, C. J., Garwood, J. D, Dueber, D., McGrew, J.

2026-05-05

Research is needed on teacher intrapersonal factors that could inform burnout interventions. This study aimed to identify teacher- and school-level variables that could guide both individual and leadership-focused interventions. We also evaluated the sensitivity of three different burnout/work engagement measures to changes in teacher and school factors. Specifically, we (a) assessed and compared the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI), and Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) in tracking burnout and engagement among special education teachers over a school year; (b) identified teacher intrapersonal and school-level predictors of burnout that could inform future interventions; and (c) examined the proportion of variance in burnout and engagement explained by these factors. Consistent with findings from other professions, burnout and engagement remained largely stable, and predictor effects varied depending on the burnout measure used. Teacher intrapersonal factors accounted for nearly one-third of the variance in change with the OLBI, compared to only 10% for the MBI and UWES. School-level factors explained less variance in burnout but contributed over 10% of the variance in work engagement. These findings suggest that the OLBI may be more sensitive to changes in teacher-focused interventions, while the UWES may better reflect organizational influences on teacher engagement.

All they need is a little respect: Exploring associations among identity, respect, and teacher retention (advance online pubication)

Psychology in the Schools

Cormier, C. J., Romano, L. E., Stark, K., & F. C. Worrell

2026-04-01

The present study utilized data from the 2017 Educator Quality of Work Life Survey (EQWLS). The EQWLS was distributed through the American Federation of Teachers and the Badass Teachers Association to document educators' experiences regarding their well-being, working conditions, and stressors. We found that the extent to which teachers feel respected is a significant predictor of their likelihood of remaining in the profession. Specifically, feeling respected by supervisors, coworkers, students, and parents was a significant predictor of remaining in the profession when controlling for all demographic variables, including teacher race and gender, after controlling for stress and a sense of safety, suggesting that respect may be a particularly salient and important dimension of teacher retention efforts.

View more