Areas of Expertise (6)
Culture and Cognition
Social Media Policy
Douglas Guilbeault is an Assistant Professor in the Management of Organizations Group at the Haas School of Business. He studies how people learn, challenge, develop, and invent categories by communicating in social networks. This investigation extends to the analysis of how organizations mediate and augment social computation by enabling new forms of communication, coordination, and creativity. This investigation further extends into how the social construction of meaning can be shaped by various sources of influence, such as political messaging and the design of social media platforms. His work on these topics has appeared in a number of top journals, including Nature Communications, The Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences, and Management Science, as well as in popular news outlets, such as The Atlantic and Wired. Guilbeault’s work has received top research awards from The International Conference on Computational Social Science, The Cognitive Science Society, and The International Communication Association. In addition, he was a recipient of Stanford's "The Art of Science" award for the piece "Changing Views in Data Science over 50 Years" produced in collaboration with the research collective, comp-syn. Guilbeault has also worked as a consultant on social media policy and people analytics for leading tech companies (e.g., Google and Facebook). His current research is funded by Facebook and the NIH.
Honors & Awards (7)
Barbara and Gerson Bakar Faculty Fellowship (professional)
Stanford’s Art of Science Award
2020 Changing Views in Data Science over Fifty Years
Facebook Content Moderation Policy Research Award
2019 Networked Crowdsourcing: An Online Experiment in Content Moderation. w. Damon Centola. ($100,000)
Computational Modeling Prize in Applied Cognition
2019 The Social Network Dynamics of Category Formation. The 41st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. w. Andrea Baronchelli and Damon Centola. ($1000)
Best Paper Award
2018 Bipartisan Social Networks Reduce Political Bias in the Interpretation of Climate Trends. The International Conference on Computational Social Science. Kellogg, Northwestern, July. w. Joshua Becker and Damon Centola. ($1,000)
2018 The Network Dynamics of Interdisciplinary Research. The Institute for Research on Innovation and Science, The University of Michigan. ($15,000)
Top Student Paper Award
2018 What should we do about Political Automation? Challenges for Policy and Research. Communication & Technology Division, The International Communication Association, Prague, March. w. Robert Gorwa.
Positions Held (1)
At Haas since 2020
2021 - present, Faculty Affiliate, Berkeley Institute for Data Science (BIDS) 2020 - present, Assistant Professor, Management of Organizations, Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley
Media Appearances (9)
Want to go viral? Influencers won’t be much help if you’re trying to spread a complex idea
Fast Company online
Marketing and public relations gospel has long banked on the idea that simply reaching the well-connected people at the centers of social networks will create success. If you can just get your brilliant innovation to Kevin Bacon, then virality and riches will follow, right? Wrong, say social network researchers at the University California Berkeley and the University of Pennsylvania, who have found that influencers are rather impotent when it comes to changing the behavior and beliefs of others, and might be detrimental to some messaging.
Well-connected members of tight-knit groups spread controversial ideas much more readily than “influencers”
PNAS News online
The people who spread new and controversial ideas—changes in diet, exercise routine, political leaning, or even attitudes about vaccination—may not be the Kim Kardashians and Paris Hiltons. According to a recent study in Nature Communications, those with the most actual influence are often on the periphery of the social network. Coauthor and computational sociologist Douglas Guilbeault says that what makes these people special is that they are embedded in a tight-knit group with many connections to other tight-knit groups, even if each individual has fewer contacts than the most popular or famous person in the network.
Why independent cultures think alike when it comes to categories: It's not in the brain
Imagine you gave the exact same art pieces to two different groups of people and asked them to curate an art show. The art is radical and new. The groups never speak with one another, and they organize and plan all the installations independently. On opening night, imagine your surprise when the two art shows are nearly identical. How did these groups categorize and organize all the art the same way when they never spoke with one another?
How seeing a political logo can impair your understanding of facts
PBS News Hour online
Merely seeing these political and social labels can cause you to reject facts that you would otherwise support, according to a study published by Guilbeault et al. on Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academies of Science.
Regulating Bots on Social Media Is Easier Said Than Done
A bot is an automated software program that does something. Beyond this rudimentary description, bots vary tremendously. As Robert Gorwa and Douglas Guilbeault’s helpful typology of bots shows, a social media account could have automated components but retain some degree of human control, creating a sort of cyborg bot (a “cybot”).
How Political Campaigns Weaponize Social Media Bots
Analysis of computational propaganda in the 2016 U.S. presidential election reveals the reach of bots
Tinder nightmares: the promise and peril of political bots
In the days leading up to the UK’s general election, youths looking for love online encountered a whole new kind of Tinder nightmare. A group of young activists built a Tinder chatbot to co-opt profiles and persuade swing voters to support Labour. The bot accounts sent 30,000-40,000 messages to targeted 18-25 year olds in battleground constituencies like Dudley North, which Labour ended up winning by only 22 votes.
Social Media's Increasing Role In The 2016 Presidential Election
Did social media help make 2016 one of the nastiest campaign seasons ever? In part yes, due to the nature of social networks.
How Twitter Bots are Shaping the Election
The Atlantic online
There is power in numbers, or so the saying goes. But statistics mean different things to different people. Take Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, for instance. Last week, the conservative political commentator Scottie Nell Hughes summed up the relative value of digits in a conversation with Anderson Cooper. “The only place that we’re hearing that Donald Trump honestly is losing is in the media or these polls,” she said. “You’re not seeing it with the crowd rallies, you’re not seeing it on social media—where Donald Trump is two to three times more popular than Hillary Clinton on every social media platform.”
Selected Papers & Publications (5)
Topological Measures for Identifying and Predicting the Spread of Complex ContagionsNature Communications
Douglas Guilbeault and Damon Centola
Experimental Evidence for Scale Induced Category Convergence across PopulationsNature Communications
Douglas Guilbeault, Andrea Baronchelli, and Damon Centola
The Crowd Classification Problem: Social Dynamics of Binary Choice AccuracyManagement Science
Joshua Becker, Douglas Guilbeault, and Ned Smith
Social learning and partisan bias in the interpretation of climate trendsPNAS
Douglas Guilbeault, Joshua Becker, and Damon Centola
Unpacking the Social Media Bot: A Typology to Guide Research and PolicyPolicy and Internet
Robert Gorwa and Douglas Guilbeault