hero image
Dr. Karen Davis - University Health Network. Toronto, ON, CA

Dr. Karen Davis Dr. Karen Davis

Senior Scientist, Krembil Research Institute (Krembil) | University Health Network

Toronto, ON, CANADA

Dr. Karen Davis is a professor and head of Division of Brain, Imaging & Behaviour Systems at the Krembil Research Institute (Krembil).



Dr. Karen Davis Publication



loading image


Karen Davis, Ph.D, University of Toronto, Canada The Neuroethics of Pain Diagnostics Using Neuroimaging by Karen Davis:Hank Greely:Tor Wager, Brain M How does your brain respond to pain? - Karen D. Davis




Karen D. Davis is a Professor in the Department of Surgery and Institute of Medical Science at the University of Toronto, and heads the Division of Brain, Imaging and Behaviour – Systems Neuroscience at the Krembil Research Institute (Krembil). She is also a founding member of the University of Toronto Centre for the Study of Pain and sits on its Executive Committee.

Since 1993, Dr. Davis has pioneered brain imaging for the study of pain. Her lab uses brain imaging to examine mechanisms underlying chronic pain, pain-attention interactions, brain plasticity, concussion, disease vulnerability and recovery.

Dr. Davis has given over 140 invited lectures, published over 125 papers and has been inducted into the Johns Hopkins Society of Scholars. She was the ‘pain measurement and imaging’ Section Head of the journal Pain for 10 years and a 2013-14 Mayday Pain and Society Fellow. Dr. Davis has a strong interest in research ethics, having created a graduate student oath, and in neuroethics pertaining to brain imaging. She also sits on several boards, including the Scientific Advisory Council of Brain Canada, the Institute Advisory Board of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and the Council of the International Association for the Study of Pain.

Her TED-Ed video titled "How does your brain respond to pain?" has hit over 500,000 views.

Industry Expertise (4)

Education/Learning Health Care - Providers Research Writing and Editing

Areas of Expertise (5)

Neuroscience Neuroimaging Life Sciences Behavioural Analysis Brain

Accomplishments (2)

Canada Reseaerch Chair in Brain and Behaviour, tier II (2000-2010) (professional)

Dr. Davis held the position of Research Chair from 2000-2010.

Johns Hopkins University Society of Scholars (2009) (professional)

The society inducts former postdoctoral fellows, postdoctoral degree recipients, house staff and junior or visiting faculty who have served at least a year at Johns Hopkins and thereafter gained marked distinction elsewhere in their fields.

Education (4)

The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine: Post Doctoral Fellow,, Neuroscience 1991

University of Toronto: PhD, Physiology 1988

University of Toronto: MSc, Physiology 1984

University of Toronto: BSc, Physiology 1983

Affiliations (3)

  • International Association for the Study of Pain : Councilor
  • Institute of Neuroscience Mental Health and Addiction : Advisory Board
  • Scientific Advisory Council of Brain Canada : Advisory Board

Media Appearances (2)

Pain Cases May Usher Brain Scans into the Courtroom

Scientific American  online


"Questions surround whether brain-scan measures of whether someone is in pain are reliable enough to be used in legal proceedings."

Dr. Davis is featured in this article for Scientific American.

Media Appearance Image

view more

How A Wandering Brain Can Help People Cope With Pain

NPR  online


"A brain that can let other thoughts bubble up despite being in pain might help its owner benefit from meditation or other cognitive therapies."

Dr. Davis is featured in this article for NPR.

Media Appearance Image

view more

Event Appearances (3)

Using YouTube Videos as a Means of Widely Disseminating Knowledge About Pain

The Canadian Pain Society 2016 Conference  Vancouver, BC


Brain representations of pain sensitivity: Your Brain is Not My Brain!

Vision Science Graduate Student Conference  School of Optometry and Vision Science, Waterloo, ON


Measuring inner space: deep brain stimulation and neural response

Beyond a Yardstick: Northumberland Learning Connection  Columbus Community Centre, Cobourg, ON


Articles (3)

Individual Differences in Temporal Summation of Pain Reflect Pronociceptive and Antinociceptive Brain Structure and Function The Journal of Neuroscience

1 July 2015

Temporal summation of pain (TSP), the perception of increasingly greater pain evoked by repetitive noxious stimuli, is highly variable between individuals. Individuals with facilitated pain processing and/or reduced pain-modulatory capabilities are regarded as pronociceptive, whereas individuals with reduced pain processing capacity are characterized as antinociceptive. Brodmann area (BA) 3a of the primary somatosensory cortex is part of an ascending pathway from the sensory thalamus that mediates TSP. Descending pain modulation involves projections from the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC) to the periaqueductal gray to the rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM). Here, we tested the hypothesis that pronociceptive individuals have an enhanced TSP response compared with antinociceptive individuals, marked by facilitated ascending nociceptive processing and/or reduced capacity for descending pain modulation. Eighty healthy humans were tested with a TSP protocol and underwent structural and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. We found large interindividual differences in TSP responses, which were positively correlated with functional connectivity (FC) between individuals' right sensory thalamus with their BA 3a (thal-BA 3a), and with cortical thickness in their insula and medial prefrontal cortex. In contrast, TSP was negatively correlated with FC between individuals' RVM with their sgACC (RVM-sgACC). When subjects were grouped as pronociceptive or antinociceptive based on whether they had greater thal-BA 3a or RVM-sgACC FC respectively, pronociceptive subjects showed greater TSP responses. Furthermore, TSP was positively correlated with the extent of imbalance toward ascending nociceptive processing. Our study indicates that individuals with enhanced TSP have facilitated ascending nociceptive processing and reduced pain-modulatory capacities.

view more

Is there evidence for neurodegenerative change following traumatic brain injury in children and youth? A scoping review Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

March 2014

While generalized cerebral atrophy and neurodegenerative change following traumatic brain injury (TBI) is well recognized in adults, it remains comparatively understudied in the pediatric population, suggesting that research should address the potential for neurodegenerative change in children and youth following TBI. This focused review examines original research findings documenting evidence for neurodegenerative change following TBI of all severities in children and youth. Our relevant inclusion and exclusion criteria identified a total of 16 articles for review. Taken together, the studies reviewed suggest there is evidence for long-term neurodegenerative change following TBI in children and youth. In particular both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies revealed volume loss in selected brain regions including the hippocampus, amygdala, globus pallidus, thalamus, periventricular white matter, cerebellum, and brain stem as well as overall decreased whole brain volume and increased CSF and ventricular space. Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) studies also report evidence for decreased cellular integrity, particularly in the corpus callosum. Sensitivity of the hippocampus and deep limbic structures in pediatric populations are similar to findings in the adult literature and we consider the data supporting these changes as well as the need to investigate the possibility of neurodegenerative onset in childhood associated with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI).

view more

Beyond metaphor: contrasting mechanisms of social and physical pain Trends in Cognitive Sciences

August 2013

Physical pain can be clearly distinguished from other states of distress. In recent years, however, the notion that social distress is experienced as physically painful has permeated the scientific literature and popular media. This conclusion is based on the overlap of brain regions that respond to nociceptive input and sociocultural distress. Here we challenge the assumption that underlies this conclusion – that physical pain can be easily inferred from a particular pattern of activated brain regions – by showing that patterns of activation commonly presumed to constitute the ‘pain matrix’ are largely unspecific to pain. We then examine recent analytical advances that may improve the specificity of imaging for parsing pain from a broad range of perceptually unique human experiences.

view more