hero image
Edward Sippel, P.E., Ph.D. - Milwaukee School of Engineering. Milwaukee, WI, US

Edward Sippel, P.E., Ph.D.

Assistant Professor | Milwaukee School of Engineering

Milwaukee, WI, UNITED STATES

Ed Sippel is an expert in structural engineering with a focus on steel structures, stability, and structural analysis.

Education, Licensure and Certification (3)

Ph.D.: Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison 2022

M.S.: Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison 2013

B.S.: Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison 2010

Areas of Expertise (5)

Structural Engineering

Structural Steel

Finite Element Analysis

Nonlinear Analysis & Stability

Civil Engineering

Affiliations (3)

  • American Institute for Steel Construction (AISC) : Member & Faculty Advisor
  • American Institute for Steel Construction (AISC) : Member & Faculty Advisor
  • Structural Engineers Association of Wisconsin (SEAWI) : Member

Social

Selected Publications (3)

Experimental investigation of fixed-ended hot-rolled austenitic stainless-steel unequal-leg angles under compression

Structures

2024 An experimental evaluation of stainless steel unequal-leg angles exhibiting elastic and inelastic buckling with comparison to existing design provisions.

view more

Experimental Verification of Eccentrically Loaded Steel Joist Analysis with Nonsymmetric Sections

Journal of Structural Engineering

2023 This paper demonstrates how a novel line element, which is available for use in MASTAN2, can account for nonsymmetric cross-section behavior resulting in a reasonable prediction of steel joists subjected to nonstandard loading, specifically eccentric loading to one bottom chord angle.

view more

Influence of torsional stiffness in double-angle open-web joist and joist girder chords

Journal of Constructional Steel Research

2022 This paper investigates the buckling behavior of double-angle joist chords, while discussing the differences between the AISC and SJI design provisions with respect to buckling capacity. Through this work, a mechanical reason for this difference was identified, which provided an explanation how the different procedures are consistent with each other while making simplifying assumptions for practical design applications.

view more