Gretchen Chapman

Professor and Department Head Carnegie Mellon University

  • Pittsburgh PA

Gretchen Chapman's research combines judgment and decision-making with health psychology.

Contact

Carnegie Mellon University

View more experts managed by Carnegie Mellon University

Biography

Gretchen Chapman has been a Professor in Social & Decision Sciences since 2017. Prior to joining the faculty at CMU, Dr. Chapman was a Distinguished Professor of Psychology at Rutgers University where she served as Department Chair of Psychology and Acting Co-Director of the Center for Cognitive Science. She is the recipient of an APA early career award and a NJ Psychological Association Distinguished Research Award, a fellow of APA and APS. She is a former senior editor at Psychological Science, a past president of the Society for Judgment & Decision Making, the author of more than 100 journal articles, and the recipient of 20 years of continuous external funding.

Areas of Expertise

Health Behavior
Decision Research
Field Experiments‎
Decision Processes
Risk Preferences
Default Effect
Behavorial Game Theory
Public Health Analysis

Media Appearances

Workplace requirements a strong tool to reduce COVID-19 risk: expert

McKnight's Senior Living  online

2023-01-12

But, Chapman said, mask-wearing is an example of the “power of situation.” “We behave in different ways in different situations depending on the context. The important part of context is social norms, or what other people are doing,” she said. “If we can structure the situation so mask-wearing looks like the normative thing to do, then a lot of folks are going to follow along and follow that norm.”

View More

It’s Time to Wear a Mask Again, Health Experts Say

New York Times  print

2022-12-13

"Realistically, not everyone in the United States — or a certain city — will wear a mask. In fact, you might find yourself the only person in a store or on a plane who’s wearing one. Don’t let that discourage you. For one thing, remember that no one is thinking about you as much as you think they are. In social psychology, this is called the spotlight illusion, said Gretchen Chapman, a professor of social and decision sciences at Carnegie Mellon University. 'I may feel that everyone’s staring at me because I’m wearing a mask, but chances are that’s like the 11th thing on their list to worry about,' she said.

What’s more, Dr. Chapman said, 'There are lots of situations in life where we do something that makes us feel awkward, but if we think it’s important enough, we do it anyway.'”

View More

Scaling the cost of government programs using a cost-per-person price tag improves comprehension by the general public

Phys Org  online

2022-07-04

"When President Trump wanted to spend $10 billion on the border wall, conservatives were saying it was a great idea while liberals were saying why spend that much money on a wall," said Gretchen Chapman, department head and professor of Social and Decision Sciences at CMU. Chapman is the senior author on the study. "This got our team thinking, and we began by asking how big is $10 billion, and how do people really think about such a really big number?"

View More

Show All +

Social

Industry Expertise

Health and Wellness
Public Policy

Accomplishments

Distinguished Research Award, New Jersey Psychological Association

2011

Society for Medical Decision Making Award for Outstanding Paper by a Young Investigator

2000

American Psychological Association Distinguished Scientific Awards for an Early Career Contribution to Psychology

1998/1999

Show All +

Education

Bryn Mawr College

A.B.

Psychology

1985

University of Pennsylvania

Ph.D.

Psychology

1990

Affiliations

  • Association for Psychological Science : Fellow
  • American Psychological Association : Fellow
  • Society for Judgment & Decision Making : Past President
  • Psychological Science : Former Senior Editor
  • European Association of Decision Making : Member
Show All +

Languages

  • English

Event Appearances

Panelist "Psychology of vaccine hesitancy"

(2021) Association for Health Care Journalists, Summit on Mental Health  Virtual

Panel presentation "Large numbers cause magnitude misinterpretation: The case of government expenditures"

(2022) AAAS Meeting  

Panelists for session on “Leveraging psychological science to promote COVID-19 vaccine uptake during a public health emergency.”

(2022) Association for Psychological Science Meeting  

Research Grants

“Don't Throw Your Heart Away: Decision Processes Explain the High Discard Rate of Pediatric Donor Hearts,”

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

Alison Butler, PI; Gretchen Chapman, Faculty Mentor. NIH F30 HL152526-01, 7/15/2020 – 7/24/2024,

“Improving pediatric donor heart availability through in-depth collaboration between behavioral and clinical sciences”

Enduring Hearts Foundation

Justin Godown, PI; Gretchen Chapman, co-I. 7/01/2021 – 6/30/2023

"Lay understanding of vaccine efficacy"

Doctoral Dissertation Research in DRMS

Gretchen Chapman, PI; Alison Butler, co-PI. NSF SES-2149406, 02/01/2022 – 1/31/2023

Articles

Using analogy-based messages to influence attitudes toward workplace COVID-19 vaccination mandates

SocArXiv

2022

Workplace mandates are a highly effective strategy for increasing COVID-19 vaccination rates, and their adoption by United States employers grew throughout 2021. Still, public opinion on these mandates has remained starkly polarized. Drawing from the widespread use of analogies in health communication during the pandemic, we investigated whether analogies to widely-accepted workplace safety rules could affect attitudes toward vaccination mandates. In a survey experiment conducted in September-October 2021, 1194 respondents were randomized to one of three messages about workplace COVID-19 vaccination mandates that included (1) no analogy;(2) an analogy to workplace hard hat policies; or (3) an analogy to workplace smoking bans. Only the smoking analogy increased support for (b= 0.41; p

View more

Crowdsourcing interventions to promote uptake of COVID-19 booster vaccines

EClinicalMedicine

2022

Background
COVID-19 booster vaccine uptake rates are behind the rate of primary vaccination in many countries. Governments and non-governmental institutions rely on a range of interventions aiming to increase booster uptake. Yet, little is known how experts and the general public evaluate these interventions.

Methods
We applied a novel crowdsourcing approach to provide rapid insights on the most promising interventions to promote uptake of COVID-19 booster vaccines. In the first phase (December 2021), international experts (n = 78 from 17 countries) proposed 46 unique interventions. To reduce noise and potential bias, in the second phase (January 2022), experts (n = 307 from 34 countries) and representative general population samples from the UK (n = 299) and the US (n = 300) rated the proposed interventions on several evaluation criteria, including effectiveness and acceptability, on a 5-point Likert-type scale.

View more

The impact of donor consent mechanism on organ procurement organization performance in the United States

The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation

2023

BACKGROUND
Lack of donor organ availability represents a major limitation to the success of solid organ transplantation. The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) publishes performance reports of organ procurement organizations (OPO) in the United States, but does not stratify by the mechanism of donor consent, namely first-person authorization (organ donor registry) and next-of-kin authorization. This study aimed to report the trends in deceased organ donation in the United States and assess the regional differences in OPO performance after accounting for the different mechanisms of donor consent.
METHODS
The SRTR database was queried for all eligible deaths (2008-2019) which were then stratified based on the mechanism of donor authorization. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess the probability of organ donation across OPOs based on specific donor consent mechanisms. Eligible deaths were divided into 3 cohorts based on the probability to donate. Consent rates at the OPO level were calculated for each cohort.

View more

Show All +