Hein Goemans

Professor of Political Science University of Rochester

  • Rochester NY

Goemans is an expert on international conflict and war termination

Contact

University of Rochester

View more experts managed by University of Rochester

Spotlight

1 min

How the Black Sea ceasefire could backfire for Ukraine

Washington is touting the proposed Black Sea ceasefire between Ukraine and Russia, but there are signs that Russia could emerge from the deal with the upper hand. Hein Goemans, a political science professor at the University of Rochester whose research focuses on territorial disputes and what starts and ends wars, says the agreement “doesn’t really mean much.” “What matters is territorial divisions,” Goemans says. “I see this ceasefire deal as Russia trying to play the United States.” Goemans says the deal would be reasonable if the U.S. were willing to enforce it with sanctions if, or when, Russia reneges. “Ukraine should not believe this deal is in any way credible if the U.S. is not willing to commit to sanctions if Russia reneges, which it will,” Goemans says. He adds that the deal also favors Russia if other parts of it, like the repatriation of Ukrainian children, are not effected. “The chance that Russia would effectively help with the repatriation of Ukrainian abducted children is zero,” Goemans says. “It appears Russia has not compromised on any dimension.” Goemans recently shared similar thoughts with Newsweek, and is regularly tapped by news outlets around the world for his insights on the war in Ukraine and territorial disputes in hotspots across the globe. Reach Goemans by clicking on his profile.

Hein Goemans

Areas of Expertise

Ukraine
International Conflict
War termination
International Relations
War and Conflict
Territorial Disputes
International Conflict Resolution

Social

Biography

Hein Goemans is an expert on international relations, conflict, and qualitative and historical research. His current research revolves around territory, borders and homelands, and why people are willing to fight and die for one piece of land and not another. His previous research examined the role of leaders in war initiation and termination.

Education

University of Chicago

PhD

Johns Hopkins University

MA

Selected Media Appearances

Three years since Russia's invasion of Ukraine, Trump sides with Russia

WXXI Connections  radio

2025-02-24

Three years to the day that Russia invaded Ukraine and tried to eliminate Ukraine's national identity, the Trump administration is demanding that Ukraine make a list of concessions: territory; NATO dreams; even rare earth minerals that Trump wants.

Meanwhile, the Trump team has not asked Russian to give up anything.

We talk about the negotiations that have so far excluded Ukraine.

Among Our guests:

Hein Goemans, author of "War and Punishment," and professor of political science and director of the Peter D. Watson Center for Conflict & Cooperation at the University of Rochester

View More

The Obstacles to Diplomacy in Ukraine Russia’s Extreme Demands—and Ukraine’s Desire to Survive—Make Negotiations Unlikely

Foreign Affairs  print

2024-04-01

By Branislav L. Slantchev and Hein Goemans
To make peace in a conflict, both parties have to be willing to accept each other’s minimum demands. And despite the mutual lack of progress, neither Russia nor Ukraine can swallow each other’s requirements. Kyiv, for instance, cannot accept Russia’s demand for new leadership. Moscow cannot accede to Ukraine’s demand for reparations. Both sides will not give up land.

HEIN GOEMANS is Professor of Political Science at the University of Rochester. He is the author of War and Punishment: The Causes of War Termination and the First World War.

View More

How Russia and Ukraine interpret and signal information will determine the course of the war Hein Goemans and Branislav Slantchev argue that the fighting will not end until expectations converge

The Economist  print

2023-09-21

War is learning, and learning is about information. The war in Ukraine, like any other, cannot end while the two sides have wildly different expectations about the likely outcome if both stay in the fight.

Hein Goemans is a professor of political science at the University of Rochester and the author of “War and Punishment: the Causes of War Termination and the First World War”. Branislav Slantchev is a professor of political science at the University of California San Diego.

View More

Show All +

Selected Event Appearances

Maps to Die For

Political Science Speaker Series  Duke University

2022-03-03

Answers

Could the limited naval ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine usher in further progress on peace negotiations?
Hein Goemans

Agreement on this doesn't really mean much. What matters is territorial divisions. I see this ceasefire deal as Russia trying to play the United States. The deal would be reasonable if the U.S. would be willing to enforce it with sanctions if Russia reneges, which it will. Ukraine should not believe this deal is in any way credible if the U.S. is not willing to commit to sanctions if Russia reneges. So, the question is, "Will the U.S. reimpose sanctions if the Russia reneges?" The deal also favors Russia if other parts of the agreement, like the repatriation of Ukrainian children, are not effected, and the chance that Russia would effectively help with the repatriation of Ukrainian abducted children is zero. It appears that Russia has not compromised on any dimension.