Ignacio Higareda
Associate Professor | Loyola Marymount University
Los Angeles, CA, UNITED STATES
Department of Teaching and Learning
Biography
Ignacio Higareda is an Associate Professor in the Department of Teaching and Learning.
Education (2)
University of Southern California: Ph.D, Educational Psychology
University of California, Santa Cruz: B.A, Psychology
Areas of Expertise (4)
Academic achievement of students from marginalized and underserved communities
Access and success of post-secondary education for ethnic minority students
Social Constructivist influences on academic achievement for English Language Learners
Parent Involvement and Advocacy
Industry Expertise (3)
Education/Learning
Training and Development
Research
Articles (2)
Within-group diversity in minority disproportionate representation: English language learners in urban school districts
Exceptional Children2003-07-01
A weakness of research on minority placement in special education is the tendency to overestimate the homogeneity of populations by failing to disaggregate factors such as language proficiency or to consider other relevant variables, for example, social class or program type. Similarly, certain groups have been understudied, such as English language learners (ELLs). We addressed these gaps by examining ELL placement patterns in California urban districts. Disproportionate representation patterns were related to grade level, language proficiency status, disability category, type of special education program, and type of language support program. Students proficient in neither their native language nor in English (particularly in secondary grades) were most affected. Implications for further research and practice are discussed.
Appropriating the Sociocultural Resources of Latino Paraeducators for Effective Instruction with Latino Students Promise and Problems
Urban Education2009-09-01
This article examines the sociocultural scaffolding practices of 24 Latino paraeducators and 8 former Latino paraeducators (who had recently become teachers) as they worked with Latino students in two large urban schools. Instances were observed in which participants used important funds of knowledge in their interactions with students during instruction, in informal contexts, and in the case of the current paraeducators to inform the teachers with whom they worked in the community. Unfortunately, use of sociocultural scaffolding was scarce, nonstrategic, and not directly tied to instruction. We argue that under ideal instructional conditions, this knowledge should be fostered, used strategically, and appropriated more systematically.
