Jennifer Dolman

Partner, Litigation Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP

  • Toronto ON

Commercial litigator with deep expertise in advising Canadian and international franchisors with all manner of business disputes.

Contact

Social

Biography

Jennifer’s litigation practice focuses on disputes involving franchising and other commercial matters, employment, defamation, intellectual property and privacy. Jennifer has particular expertise in injunctions and emergency applications. She has represented companies in a broad range of industries including some of the world’s best known brands. Prior to joining Osler in 1992, she clerked for the Chief Justice of the Ontario Court.

Jennifer has written over 30 articles in a regular online Franchise Focus column for the FP Entrepreneur in the National Post.

Industry Expertise

Legal Services

Areas of Expertise

Class Actions
Defamation Law
Franchise Law
Employment & Labour Law
Hospitality and Leisure
Intellectual Property
Internet
Privacy and Data Management
Retail

Accomplishments

Recognized as a leading franchise lawyer in:

Best Lawyers in Canada (2008-2017)
The Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory (2011-2017)
Chambers Canada: Canada's Leading Lawyers for Business (2016-2017)
Who's Who Legal Canada (2015)
Who's Who Legal: Franchise (2015)
Franchise Times Legal Eagle (2011-2014)
Lexpert Guide to the Leading US/Canada Cross-border Corporate Lawyers in Canada (2013-2014)

Education

University of Toronto

B.A.

1986

McGill University

LL.B

1989

Affiliations

  • American Bar Association (including Franchise Law Journal Editorial Board)
  • Advocates’ Society
  • Canadian Franchise Association
  • Ontario Bar Association (current Chair of Franchise Law Section)
  • Intellectual Property Institute of Canada
Show All +

Languages

  • English

Media Appearances

A Major Evolution in Class Action Litigation

Lexpert Magazine  online

2013-12-02

Securities class actions, which often have cross-border elements, are facing threats on a number of fronts in Canada.

View More

Complexity of Tim Hortons class action motion was ‘off the charts’

Canadian Lawyer Magazine  online

2014-02-11

Tim Hortons has been awarded $1.8 million in costs in a franchise class action certification and summary judgment motion dismissed in 2012.

View More

Relief for Franchisors

Lexpert Magazine  online

2015-06-23

The good news for franchsors is that the government listened to the industry and revised the wording of the Act, which was overwhelmingly approved May 26 and is set to come into effect January 2017.

View More

Show All +

Event Appearances

Post-Sale Duty to Disclose: Does it Exist

Canadian Franchise Association Law Day  

2014-01-30

One Hundred Days to Trial or Final Arbitration Hearing (Speaker)

37th American Bar Association Forum on Franchising  

2014-10-15

Best Practices for Enforcing Non-Competes and Other Restrictive Covenants (Speaker)

Ontario Bar Association’s 14th Annual Franchise Law Conference  

2014-11-18

Show All +

Articles

Using Negotiation and Mediation to Resolve International Franchise Disputes

International Journal of Franchising Law (Co-author)

2013-01-01

This article discusses the use and effectiveness of forms of non-binding dispute resolution to resolve problems that arise in international franchise relationships. It addresses the methods and structures for drafting provisions in international franchise agreements, procedures and techniques for conducting non-binding dispute resolution, and regional differences in contract provisions and procedures for conducting arbitration and mediation.

Québec Court of Appeal Upholds Finding of Franchisor’s Obligation to Maintain Brand Strength (Co-author)

Osler Update

2015-04-17

In a highly anticipated decision released on April 15, 2015, the Québec Court of Appeal upheld the findings of Justice Tingley of the Québec Superior Court that the Dunkin’ Donuts franchisor in Québec breached its franchise agreements with its Québec franchisees by failing to adequately support them in the face of the “Tim Hortons phenomenon” in that province.

View more

Best Practices for Enforcing Non-Competes and Other Restrictive Covenants (Co-author)

Advocate’s Quarterly

2015-02-02

Restrictive covenants are a routine component of most franchise agreements. These provisions frequently prohibit the franchisee (and the franchisee owner) from operating a competing business during the currency of the relationship and for a specified period of time thereafter, usually within a certain radius of the franchised premises and sometimes within the territory of other franchisees in
the network.

View more

Show All +