Jennifer Dolman
Partner, Litigation Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
- Toronto ON
Commercial litigator with deep expertise in advising Canadian and international franchisors with all manner of business disputes.
Social
Biography
Jennifer has written over 30 articles in a regular online Franchise Focus column for the FP Entrepreneur in the National Post.
Industry Expertise
Areas of Expertise
Accomplishments
Recognized as a leading franchise lawyer in:
Best Lawyers in Canada (2008-2017)
The Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory (2011-2017)
Chambers Canada: Canada's Leading Lawyers for Business (2016-2017)
Who's Who Legal Canada (2015)
Who's Who Legal: Franchise (2015)
Franchise Times Legal Eagle (2011-2014)
Lexpert Guide to the Leading US/Canada Cross-border Corporate Lawyers in Canada (2013-2014)
Education
McGill University
LL.B
1989
University of Toronto
B.A.
1986
Affiliations
- American Bar Association (including Franchise Law Journal Editorial Board)
- Advocates’ Society
- Canadian Franchise Association
- Ontario Bar Association (current Chair of Franchise Law Section)
- Intellectual Property Institute of Canada
- International Franchise Association
- Havergal College Board of Governors
Languages
- English
Media Appearances
Jennifer has written over 30 articles in a regular online Franchise Focus column for the FP Entrepreneur in the National Post.
Financial Post online
Jennifer Dolman is a litigation partner with Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP in Toronto. A frequent speaker and writer on franchise law, Jennifer has particular expertise representing franchisors on franchise disputes.
Canada still scores as franchise destination
Canadian Lawyer InHouse Magazine online
2016-10-31
A recent article in Canadian Lawyer InHouse discusses some of the legislative and regulatory limitations and inconsistencies that currently exist in the Canadian franchise landscape and how those challenges are affecting the franchising of U.S. brands in Canada.
‘Joint-employer’ status could rattle franchise industry: 'It will be a game-changer'
Financial Post online
2016-06-14
According to an article by Julius Melnitzer in the Financial Post, a new concept called “joint employer status” could have a significant impact on the Canadian franchise industry. The notion of joint employer status is supported by unions and other employee advocates who maintain that franchisees and franchisors have such a close relationship that they should be deemed to be “joint employers” of a franchisee’s employees.
The Franchise Law Minefield
Lexpert US/Canada Cross-Border Guide online
2016-06-10
In an depth article featured in the recent Lexpert US/Canada Cross-Border Guide, journalist Julius Melnitzer examines the current state of the Canadian franchise industry and the complex legal issues it faces.
The Future of Franchising in Canada
Lexpert Magazine online
2016-04-18
Lingering uncertainty surrounding legislation and case law has made it increasingly challenging and costly for franchisors to comply with governing legislation in Canada.
Quebec ruling on Dunkin' Donuts case clarifies obligations of franchise owners
The Globe and Mail online
2015-06-29
The crumbling of the Dunkins empire in Quebec at the hands of Tim Hortons is a cautionary tale about the potential pitfalls of the franchisee-franchisor relationship
Relief for Franchisors
Lexpert Magazine online
2015-06-23
The good news for franchsors is that the government listened to the industry and revised the wording of the Act, which was overwhelmingly approved May 26 and is set to come into effect January 2017.
Complexity of Tim Hortons class action motion was ‘off the charts’
Canadian Lawyer Magazine online
2014-02-11
Tim Hortons has been awarded $1.8 million in costs in a franchise class action certification and summary judgment motion dismissed in 2012.
A Major Evolution in Class Action Litigation
Lexpert Magazine online
2013-12-02
Securities class actions, which often have cross-border elements, are facing threats on a number of fronts in Canada.
Event Appearances
BC’s New Franchises Act (Speaker)
The Continuing Legal Education Society
2016-12-05
16th Annual Franchise Law Conference (Speaker)
The Role of Equity in Franchise Law
2016-11-17
Duties of Good Faith: Recent Developments in the Law and Practical Implications
Lexpert Professional Development
2016-06-09
Providing Effective Field Support Without Crossing the Joint Employer Line (Roundtable Facilitator)
International Franchise Association Legal Symposium
2016-05-16
The Great Renewal Debate (Speaker)
Ontario Bar Association Franchise Law Section
2016-04-06
Social Media and Crisis Management (Speaker)
Canadian Restaurant Investment Summit
2016-03-02
Best Practices for Enforcing Non-Competes and Other Restrictive Covenants (Speaker)
Ontario Bar Association’s 14th Annual Franchise Law Conference
2014-11-18
One Hundred Days to Trial or Final Arbitration Hearing (Speaker)
37th American Bar Association Forum on Franchising
2014-10-15
Post-Sale Duty to Disclose: Does it Exist
Canadian Franchise Association Law Day
2014-01-30
Articles
Who's Who Legal Franchise 2016 Roundtable (Co-author)
Who’s Who Legal2016-11-01
Who’s Who Legal brings together Lee Plave of Plave Koch, Penny Ward of Baker & McKenzie and Jennifer Dolman of Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt to discuss issues facing franchise lawyers and their clients today.
Best practices: Including mediation and arbitration clauses in franchise agreements (Co-author)
Osler Franchise Review2016-04-14
Mediation offers particular advantages for disputes between franchisors and existing franchisees where there is a mutual interest in preserving an ongoing franchise relationship.
Restrictive covenants cannot prevent franchisees from operating in areas where the franchisor has no intention of operating (Co-author)
Osler Franchise Review2016-04-14
In MEDIchair LP v. DME Medequip Inc., 2016 ONCA 168, the Ontario Court of Appeal confirmed that a franchisor is not entitled to enforce a restrictive covenant where there is clear evidence it has no intention of operating within the protected geographic area.
Court of Appeal dismisses Pet Valu franchisee class action and clarifies scope of duty of fair dealing (Co-author)
Osler Update2016-01-18
On January 14, 2016, the Ontario Court of Appeal overturned a judgment for the franchisee class in the Pet Valu franchise class action.
Dunkin' Donuts decision has limited application outside Quebec (Co-author)
Canadian Lawyer Magazine2015-05-04
On April 15, 2015, the Quebec Court of Appeal released its highly anticipated decision in Bertico Inc. v. Dunkin’ Brands Canada Ltd., a group action brought against Dunkin’ Donuts by 21 of its franchisees in Quebec.
Best Practices for Enforcing Non-Competes and Other Restrictive Covenants (Co-author)
Advocate’s Quarterly2015-02-02
Restrictive covenants are a routine component of most franchise agreements. These provisions frequently prohibit the franchisee (and the franchisee owner) from operating a competing business during the currency of the relationship and for a specified period of time thereafter, usually within a certain radius of the franchised premises and sometimes within the territory of other franchisees in
the network.
Québec Court of Appeal Upholds Finding of Franchisor’s Obligation to Maintain Brand Strength (Co-author)
Osler Update2015-04-17
In a highly anticipated decision released on April 15, 2015, the Québec Court of Appeal upheld the findings of Justice Tingley of the Québec Superior Court that the Dunkin’ Donuts franchisor in Québec breached its franchise agreements with its Québec franchisees by failing to adequately support them in the face of the “Tim Hortons phenomenon” in that province.
Using Negotiation and Mediation to Resolve International Franchise Disputes
International Journal of Franchising Law (Co-author)2013-01-01
This article discusses the use and effectiveness of forms of non-binding dispute resolution to resolve problems that arise in international franchise relationships. It addresses the methods and structures for drafting provisions in international franchise agreements, procedures and techniques for conducting non-binding dispute resolution, and regional differences in contract provisions and procedures for conducting arbitration and mediation.
