Jo Carrillo, J.D., J.S.D. is a Professor of Law at UC Hastings.
I publish and teach (or as I understand the process, I publish to teach) on the topic of property and marital property systems, financial intimate partner violence, consumer protection issues, and what I call legal humanities. Currently, my legal research centers on how specific statutes and constellations of statutes can encourage relational equality in intimate partnerships and friendships. I am also interested in mapping financial torts and crimes that are perpetrated in the family.
In the last decade, I have worked to better understand and advance the field of California community property law, the most complex marital property system in the U.S. if not the world. I edited the eleventh edition of a family property casebook that has been in use for the past 60 years. My other publications in the field include student-oriented texts and academic articles on fundamental changes that marriage equality has initiated in law.
Recently, I completed a monograph on the themes of justice and vigilantism in James M. Cain's early work. I started archival research for the monograph in 2012. My analysis is more historical than literary.
I am an elected member of the American Law Institute. I am a member of the Modern Language Association. I am a former trustee of the Law and Society Association. I have served on the Herbert Jacob Book Prize Selection Committee. I was on the Board of Authors for the Felix Cohen Handbook of Federal Indian Law (2005).
I am a peer reviewer for different academic journals. For example, I most recently served as a peer reviewer for the start-up Museum of Science Fiction (MOSF) Journal of Science Fiction. When it comes to science fiction I am particularly interested in how speculative fiction imagines and/or re-imagines the institution of property, identity (especially gender), and intimate partnerships.
My permanent academic appointment is at UC Hastings College of the Law in San Francisco. I have held temporary appointments over the years. I served as a Visiting Professor at Stanford Law School (1998-99). I was named a Lillian and Harry Hastings Research Chair at UC Hastings (2006-07). I spent a year as a Visiting Scholar at The Center for the Study of Law & Society at UC Berkeley (2006-07). My current CV is available above.
Areas of Expertise (11)
Chip Robertson Scholarly Publications Fund Award (professional)
Awarded by UC Hastings College of the Law.
Outstanding Mentor Award to American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Students (professional)
Awarded by Stanford University.
Roger J. Traynor Scholarly Publication Award (professional)
Awarded for outstanding scholarly achievement by UC Hastings College of the Law.
Mediator Certification (professional)
Conferred by the Center for Mediation in Law.
Outstanding Service & Achievement Award (professional)
Awarded by UC Hastings 1066 Faculty Foundation.
Hastings Research Chair (professional)
Awarded by UC Hastings College of the Law.
Stanford Law School: J.S.D., Law
University of New Mexico: J.D., Law
Stanford University: B.A., Undergraduate Studies
- American Law Institute : Member
- Modern Language Association : Member
- Felix Cohen Handbook of Federal Indian Law (2005) Board of Authors
- The Center for the Study of Law and Society UC Berkeley Visiting Scholar
- Stanford Law School Visiting Professor of Law
- Law and Society Association Former Trustee
- MOSF Journal of Science Fiction peer reviewer
- Journal of Legal Education: Editorial Board
- American Indian Law Review: Peer Review Panel
- Book Series Co-editor Mapping Racisms Temple University Press
- Law and Society Review Peer Review Panel
- Law and Society Association Herbert Jacob Book Prize Selection Committee
- Political and Legal Anthropology Review (PoLAR) Peer Review Panel
- Association of American Law Schools (AALS) Chair Anthropology Section
- Equal Rights Advocates: Board of Directors
- American Men's Studies Association (AMSA)
Media Appearances (1)
Facebook Marriage: Zuckerberg's Property Status, Post-Marriage
"This means the day after the marriage, whatever anyone earns is co-owned by the marital estate,” said Jo Carrillo, a law professor at the University of California Hastings College of Law in San Francisco. But the lines between community and separate property can get fuzzy pretty quickly after that, particularly over many years of marriage. Separate property, for instance, remains separate unless that money is commingled with “community,” or joint, money and the couple does not keep records of where the money came from or who paid what, Professor Carrillo said...
Event Appearances (7)
Law, Literature, and the Possibility of Justice
Modern Language Association Annual Meeting Chicago, IL.
Why James M. Cain Matters to American Law
Invited Presentation Brooklyn Law School, New York, NY.
Reading Law: How Property Law Influenced Seven Novels of the 20th Century
Property Works in Progress University of Colorado, Boulder, CO.
Sharks and Currents: Mortgage Troubles on Main Street
The Mortgage Meltdown: Northern California Law Librarians Annual Meeting San Francisco, CA.
The Role of Truth in Lending in the Current Housing Crisis
Beyond the Bailout: Risk, Responsibility and the Road Ahead UC Hastings College of the Law, San Francisco, CA.
The Poverty Trap of the Subprime Crisis
West Coast Conference on Progressive Lawyering Stanford Law School
Popular Culture Themes in the Work of Lawrence M. Friedman
Event in Honor of Lawrence M. Friedman Stanford Law School
- Workshop Leader
- Author Appearance
- Corporate Training
Selected Articles (10)
This article discusses the sea change in California law that took place in the 1970s. It emphasizes the shift from the male management approach (the male spouse was the sole legal agent for purposes of managing community personal property) to the equal management approach (either souse can manage and control community personal property). It also discusses disclosure issues and the incorporation of self-updating Revised Uniform Partnership Act provisions into the California Family Code.
In 1995, Congress amended TILA so that massive lender liability could no longer result from minor errors in disclosure. In that same year, Congress passed a moratorium on class action claims under TILA; the moratorium was lifted on October 1, 1995. The new amendments balanced lender and consumer interests by raising the TILA tolerance bar from $10 to $100. Cases that fell above the new $100 tolerance bar could proceed forward on the merits; those that fell below could not. This paper analyzes decisional law on the issue of whether class action TILA rescission remains an available remedy for consumers. it analyzes the policy claims of lenders and borrowers through the lens of one specific class action loan rescission case.
The Federal Truth in Lending Act (TILA) requires lenders to disclose the full cost of credit to borrowers. In the case of linguistic minorities, California law goes one step further. Under California Civil Code section 1632, lenders are required to provide unexecuted translations of loan documents to consumers whose language of proficiency is one of these five protected languages: Spanish, Chinese, Tagalog, Vietnamese, and Korean. This Article considers the needs of consumers in a multilingual retail real estate market and then introduces California Civil Code section 1632 as an important step toward affirming the economic, legal, and civil rights of consumers who, by reason of their language proficiencies, are vulnerable in mortgage markets. Subsequent to this article, Cal. Civ. Code 1632 was updated to include mortgage documents.
This article analyzes the relationship between mortgage products, like negatively amortizing adjustable-rate mortgages and interest only mortgages, and the post-2005 wave of consumer legal challenges that were brought under the Truth in Lending Act (TILA), 15 U.S.C. section 1601, et seq. (TILA) to challenge these products.
This article introduces the law and society provenance of Lawrence M. Friedman's ideas on legal culture and on popular legal culture.
Lawrence M. Friedman was Jo Carrillo's principal dissertation adviser. Richard Roberts (Africanist, Stanford History Department) and William Simon (Columbia Law School) being the other two.
This article explores the application of conversion as a common law remedy for interference with home equity. Conversion is typically available only for tangible personal property. Thus this article discusses the merger by doctrine theory.
Distinguishes between economic and financial interpersonal violence. Discusses specific ways a state can address financial interpersonal violence by comparing Alaska and California law. Forthcoming 22 Domestic Violence Report __ (forthcoming 2016).
Explores the balance between consumers, lenders, and investors under Federal Truth in Lending (TILA) regulations.
This article discusses the methodological problems of incorporating oral histories into official documentary histories, particularly in a colonial context where genocide has occurred.
To Influence, Shape, and Globalize: Popular Legal Culture and Law, in LAW IN SOCIETY AND HISTORY: ESSAYS ON MAJOR THEMES IN THE WORK OF LAWRENCE M. FRIEDMAN, 69-89 (Robert W. Gordon & Morton Horwitz, eds., Cambridge University Press, 2011).
California Community Property
Covers the California community property system, which is one of the most extensive code-based family justice systems in the world.
Coverage of first year property topics including real, personal, intangible, and tangible properties.
Financial Basics for Lawyers
Introduction to financial issues relevant to litigation and state court. The course is taught by a collaborative law method.
Law of Lending
Covers mortgages, car loans, student loans, credit cards, truth in lending laws, consumer finance issues, tax deferred accounts, and basics of investing.