Jon Bauer directs the Law School’s Asylum and Human Rights Clinic, a program in which law students, supervised by Clinic faculty, represent refugees who have fled persecution and are seeking asylum in the United States. Since the program’s founding in 2002, it has won grants of asylum or related forms of relief for more than 140 clients and their families. Professor Bauer, a Yale Law School graduate, has been teaching and supervising students since 1988, when he joined the UConn faculty after four years as a staff attorney with the Legal Action Center, a public interest law firm in New York City. His teaching also has included courses in employment discrimination law, refugee law, immigration and workplace rights, evidence, and a course about Wal-Mart, as well as clinics in the areas of civil rights, poverty law, and mediation.
Professor Bauer’s scholarly writing includes studies of multiple nationality and refugees, the role of physicians in asylum cases, the ethical implications of secret settlements, and discrimination against people with disabilities in the bar admissions process. An article on clinical pedagogy he co-authored with Professor James H. Stark has been included in the Clinical Legal Education Association’s bibliography of basic reading for new clinical teachers. When not in the classroom or in court, Professor Bauer dedicates much of his time to public service. He is a past president of the Connecticut Fair Housing Center, and has served on the boards of several legal services organizations. In 2015, the Connecticut Bar Association presented him with the Tapping Reeve Legal Educator Award for his contributions to legal education and the legal profession, and in 2016 he received a civil rights “Leaders and Legends” award from the Connecticut Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities.
Areas of Expertise (5)
Asylum and Human Rights
Employment and Housing Discrimination
Asylum and Refugee Law
Yale Law School: J.D. 1984
Cornell University: B.A. 1981
- University of Connecticut, Gladstein Committee (governing board of Human Rights Institute), 2011 to present
- University of Connecticut, President’s Working Group on Immigration Changes, 2017 to present
Media Appearances (8)
'Here we go again': CT DACA recipients push forward after court decision
Hearst Connecticut Media print
The decision in federal court wasn’t a surprise to Jon Bauer, who directs the University of Connecticut Law School’s Asylum and Human Rights Clinic. Because Hanen is known for his conservative judicial philosophy, according to Bauer, the ruling was expected to interfere with DACA in some capacity. But Bauer said the ruling could be overturned. “The reasoning of the decision is very weak, in my opinion. The judge, I think, misconstrued the scope of the Department of Homeland Security's authority to engage in what's called deferred action, which is what the DACA program is,” Bauer said.
Secrecy of Settlements at Fox News Hid Bad Behavior
New York Times online
Jon Bauer, a professor of law at the University of Connecticut who has written extensively about workplace discrimination, also says the issue goes well beyond Fox News. “Employees are rewarded for shielding powerful people in the organization,” he said. “That’s the culture in many workplace settings.”
Should Georgia Bar Licensing Authorities Ask Applicants About Their Mental Health?
The nation’s top state judges and the U.S. Department of Justice have teed up a tricky issue for state bar examiners in Georgia and around the country: Do questions about new law school graduates’ mental health do more harm than good, and do they violate the Americans With Disabilities Act?
Bar Admissions Process Bends Toward Justice—With a Little Help
Connecticut Law Tribune online
State bar examiners’ recent decision to eliminate all questions about mental health, switching instead to behavior-based questions, has made Connecticut an early leader nationwide.
Congratulations Are in Order: Announcing 2019's Professional Excellence Winners
Winners of the 2019 Connecticut Legal Awards, including the three finalists for the Attorney of the Year, have been determined through a panel review of submissions sent in from attorneys and firms from across the state. In all, 65 winners from more than 40 different firms and organizations across the state are recognized in this year’s class of honorees.
Beyond The U.S.-Mexico Border: A Look At Changes To U.S. Immigration Policy
Connecticut Public Radio online
While the debate over a U.S.-Mexico border wall has been broadcast loudly across headlines, revisions to U.S. immigration policy have occurred quietly, with little notice.
American Immigration Policies Past And Present
Connecticut Public Radio online
Attorney General Jeff Sessions has announced that anyone who enters the United States illegally will be prosecuted, even if they are seeking asylum. This hour, we get the details on current immigration policies, and we ask: what has “legal immigration" really meant throughout our country’s history?
Rule revision would allow noncitizens to practice law
New Haven Register online
In his testimony, Bauer referenced a New York appellate court ruling which said “a person’s immigration status ‘does not, alone, suggest that the applicant is not possessed of the qualities that enable attorneys to vigorously defend their client’s interests within the bounds of the law, nor does it suggest that the applicant cannot protect ... the rule of law and the administration of justice.”
Event Appearances (5)
Breaking Down the Wall: How UConn Law and Social Work are Advocating for Immigrants
UConn Schools of Social Work and Law Hartford, CT
Refugees and Refugee Advocacy
International Refugee Assistance Project, UConn Law School Hartford, CT
Law School Clinics and the Work of the UConn Asylum and Human Rights Clinic
The Law Society, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT
Dreams Turned to Nightmares: The U.S. Immigration System, Youth, and Families
Diversity Week event, UConn Law School Hartford, CT
Refugees and the Asylum “Crisis”
Tzedek Shabbat Speaker Series, Scarsdale Synagogue Scarsdale, NY
Asylum seekers in a time of record forced global displacement: the role of physiciansJournal of General Internal Medicine
2019 In 2016, over 65 million individuals were displaced from their homes due to human rights abuses, and 262,000 people applied for asylum in the USA. Individuals who have experienced persecution are present in many primary and specialty clinics. A medical forensic evaluation can increase the likelihood of a successful asylum case.
When Secret Settlements are UnethicalSSRN
2015 This article explains why secrecy provisions in settlements that go beyond mandating confidentiality of the amount and terms of the settlement, and require the parties and their attorneys to refrain from disclosing the facts underlying the dispute, often violate two provisions of the Model Rules of Professional Conduct.
Multiple Nationality and RefugeesJ. Transnat'l L.
2014 Persons with more than one nationality (" multiple nationals") who flee persecution in their home country may have compelling reasons to seek asylum elsewhere rather than go to a second country of nationality where they have no ties or face serious hardships.
Buying Witness Silence: Evidence-Suppressing Settlements and Lawyers' EthicsOregon Law Review
Lawyers frequently draft settlements that impede other parties' access to relevant evidence through clauses that prohibit the plaintiff from disclosing information to anyone with a claim against the defendant or forbid all discussion of the facts underlying the dispute. This Article argues that lawyers who negotiate these noncooperation agreements violate Rule 3.4(f) of the Model Rules of Professional Conduct, which prohibits requesting someone other than the lawyer's own client to withhold relevant information from another party, and Model Rule 8.4(d), which prohibits conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice.
The Character of the Questions and the Fitness of the Process: Mental Health, Bar Admissions and the Americans with Disabilities ActUCLA Law Review
During the decade since the Americans With Disabilities Act went into effect, mental health inquiries by bar examining committees have engendered intense controversy. Courts have reached no clear consensus as to what, if any, questions about mental illness or substance abuse may be posed by licensing agencies. The trend has been towards a form of relaxed scrutiny that authorizes inquiries as long as they are focused on serious conditions that may interfere with practice, and are reasonably tailored in scope and time. This article examines the implications of allowing disability inquiries in the lawyer licensing process.