Jongwoo Jeremy Kim profile photo

Jongwoo Jeremy Kim

Associate Professor Carnegie Mellon University

  • Pittsburgh PA

Jongwoo Jeremy Kim is a historian of modern and contemporary art.

Contact
Carnegie Mellon University logo

Carnegie Mellon University

View more experts managed by Carnegie Mellon University

Biography

Jongwoo Jeremy Kim is a historian of modern and contemporary art (PhD, Institute of Fine Arts at New York University, 2007). He is the author of several books, including Painted Men in Britain (Ashgate 2012; Routledge 2016) and Male Bodies Unmade (University of California Press, 2023). His peer-reviewed articles have appeared in leading scholarly journals including Art History and positions: asia critique.

Kim’s research encompasses, in the area of pre-1960: John Singer Sargent, Frederic Leighton, Henry Scott Tuke, Aubrey Beardsley, William Nicholson, Walter Sickert, and Jean Cocteau; and post-1960: Francis Bacon, David Hockney, Robert Gober, Young-joo Byun, Kenneth Tam, and Andrew Ahn.

His work has been supported by the Clark Art Institute; the Fund for Research and Creativity Grant, the Center for the Arts in Society, and the Frank-Ratchye Studio for Creative Inquiry at Carnegie Mellon University; the Paul Mellon Centre for Studies in British Art; and the Yale Center for British Art, among other institutions.

Areas of Expertise

Modern Art
Contemporary Art
Asian American Art
Korean Art

Media

Social

Education

Institute of Fine Arts at New York University

Ph.D

Art History

2007

Institute of Fine Arts at New York Universit

M.A.

Art History

2001

Northwestern University:

M.A.

Art History

2000

Affiliations

  • Historians of British Art
  • Queer Caucus for Art
  • The North American Victorian Studies Association
  • The College Art Association

Languages

  • English
  • Korean

Event Appearances

Panelist

(2021) Intersections of Performance, Visual Arts, and Activism in Korea and the Korean Diaspora  Rhode Island School of Design

Speaker, c. 1600-1900, Center for Advanced Study in the Visual Arts

(2022) Art Academics: Europe and the Americas  Washington, DC

Panelist, “Art Writing Futures”

(2021) Association Internationale des Critiques d'Art (AICA-USA)  

Articles

Picturing the Edwardian Family Man: The Nicholsons at Home

Art History

2019

(Mr Darling arrives […]. He is really a good man as breadwinners go […]. In the city where he sits on a stool all day, as fixed as a postage stamp, he is so like all the others on stools that you recognize him not by his face but by his stool, but at home the way to gratify him is to say that he has a distinct personality. He is very conscientious, and in the days when Mrs Darling gave up keeping the house books correctly and drew pictures instead (which he called her guesses), he did all the totting up for her, holding her hand while he calculated whether they could have Wendy or not, and coming down on the right side.

View more

Pictures-within-Pictures in Nineteenth-Century Britain

Victorian Studies

2018

Roach focuses on five artists—John Scarlett Davis, JMW Turner, John Everett Millais, Emma Brownlow King, and William Powell Frith—who produced some of the most significant examples of such pictures. Roach shows that, integral to their amusement, these paintings had (and still have) a serious and generally conservative social function. By displaying pictorial pedigrees laboriously traced back to Raphael, Anthony van Dyck, Joshua Reynolds, and so on, pictures-within-pictures encourage a reverence that reasserts class stratification.

View more

Pre-Raphaelite Masculinities: Constructions of Masculinity in Art and Literature

Victorian Studies

2016

There is no doubt that scholars, including myself, will consult Yeates’s wellorganized and well-researched essay for the vile examples in which Victorian England pathologized, shamed, and oppressed variants of the male sex and their representations, but Yeates misses an opportunity to inform her readers of her scholarly position on the history of sexes, in which there is no neutrality that does not favor the oppressor.

View more