Kevin Zollman

Professor of Philosophy and Social and Decision Sciences and Director, Institute for Complex Social Dynamics | Dietrich College of Humanities & Social Sciences Carnegie Mellon University

Professor of Philosophy and Social and Decision Sciences and Director, Institute for Complex Social Dynamics

Contact

Carnegie Mellon University

View more experts managed by Carnegie Mellon University

Biography

Kevin Zollman is the Herbert A. Simon Professor of Philosophy and Social and Decision Sciences and the director of the Institute for Complex Social Dynamics at Carnegie Mellon University. In addition to his primary appointment at Carnegie Mellon, Kevin is an associate fellow at the Center for Philosophy of Science at the University of Pittsburgh, and a visiting professor at the Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy (part of Ludwig-Maximilians Universität).

Areas of Expertise

Social and Political Philosophy
Epistemology,
Philosophy of Biology
Decision and Game Theory
Philosophy of Science
Philosophy of Economics
Ethics

Media Appearances

What Investors Can Learn From the Best Poker Players

The Wall Street Journal  

How investors can sometimes make the same mistakes that poker players do.

View More

Why Playing Poker, Chess or Bridge Can Make You a Better Investor

The Street  

How lessons from games like poker can teach you how to understand game theory and risk.

View More

Video interviews on various game theory topcis

Big Think  

Recorded a series of short videos for the website BigThink on game theory topics ranging from nuclear war to parenting to poker.

View More

Show All +

Social

Education

University of California, Irvine

Ph.D.

Philosophy

2007

Dissertation: “Network Epistemology”
Committee: Brian Skyrms (chair), P. Kyle Stanford, and Jeffrey Barrett

University of California, Irvine

M.A.

Philosophy

2005

Kansas State University, Manhattan

B.S.

Philosophy

2002

Articles

How to End International Tax Competition

New York Times

How game theory sheds light on the move to lower the corporate tax rate and compete for investment.

View more

Why both Trump and Cruz can claim to represent the majority of Republicans

Los Angeles Times

The game theory behind voting and primaries was on display in the 2016 GOP primary

View more

Partial honesty in a hummingbird polymorphism provides evidence for a hybrid equilibrium

ctbergstrom

Jay J. Falk, Carl T. Bergstrom, Kevin J. S. Zollman, Alejandro Rico-Guevara

Animal signals, while informative, are unlikely to be entirely reliable. Models of such partially honest
communication have traditionally taken the form of ‘honest-enough’ signalling, in which a subset of
signallers can signal at lower cost and therefore exaggerate their perceived ability or condition.

View more

Show All +

Research Focus

The Theory of Games as a Tool for the Social Epistemologist

Traditionally, epistemologists have distinguished between epistemic and pragmatic goals. In so doing, they presume that much of game theory is irrelevant to epistemic enterprises. I will show that this is a mistake.

View More

The Scientific Ponzi Scheme

Fraud and misleading research represent serious impediments to scientific progress. We must uncover the causes of fraud in order to understand how science functions and in order to develop strategies for combating epistemically detrimental behavior.

View More

Supplementary Mathematica Notebook

Theories of scientific rationality typically pertain to belief. This paper argues that we should expand our focus to include motivations as well as belief.

View More

Show All +