Laura Reese

Director and Professor Michigan State University

  • East Lansing MI

Laura Reese is an expert in animal welfare policy, animals in the city, animal sheltering, local economic development

Contact

Michigan State University

View more experts managed by Michigan State University

Biography

Laura A. Reese is a professor of Urban & Regional Planning at MSU, and director of the Global Urban Studies Program (GUSP). She joined the faculty at MSU in the Fall of 2005 as founding director of GUSP, a research and doctoral initiative focusing on urban affairs and public policy, globalization and urban areas, and comparative urban studies. Previously, Reese was a member of the graduate Urban Planning faculty at Wayne State University after teaching in the Master of Public Administration Program in the Department of Political Science at Eastern Michigan University. Her main research and teaching areas are urban politics and public policy, economic development, and local governance and management in both Canada and the U.S. Dr. Reese has conducted large-scale evaluations for the Economic Development Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. Her research on sub-state economic development programs includes Tax Increment Finance Authorities and Industrial Tax Abatements. Reese has written several books and numerous articles in these areas, as well as public personnel administration focusing on implementation of sexual harassment policy.

Industry Expertise

Writing and Editing
Education/Learning

Areas of Expertise

Animal Welfare Policy
Animals in the City
Animal Sheltering
Local Economic Development

Education

Wayne State University

Ph.D.

Political Science

University of Michigan-Dearborn

B.A.

Political Science

Research Focus

Animal Welfare Policy & Animal Sheltering

My research focuses on animal welfare policy and animal sheltering. I also do research on economic development policy and have a specific focus on the City of Detroit.

Journal Articles

Environmental Correlates of Dog Bites: A Spatial Analysis”

Journal of Urban Affairs

2018

To be able to design effective urban public health programs to reduce the risk of dog bites and transmission of disease, the very complex factors that lead to bites need to be considered holistically. This research focuses specifically on the role of spatial and environmental factors as urban public health risks. In doing this, it addresses the following research questions:

(1) What are the relative powers of traditional demographic versus environmental variables in explaining dog bites?

(2) Do different areas of the city evidence different correlates of bites?

The answer to the first is that despite a long tradition in the literature, demographic variables do a relatively poor job of explaining variation in the rates of emergency room visits due to dog bites. Rather, environmental and spatial variables, particularly crime, vacancy, and blight, are better predictors of dog bites than traditional demographic variables such as age and gender. However, even the best-fitting regression model leaves dog bites in many areas of a city unexplained; bite covariates differ by neighborhood. Thus, to effectively address the risk of dog bites in urban areas, different policies are required for different neighborhood conditions.

View more

Everyone Loves a Dog Story: Narratives of Urban Animal Welfare Policy

Social Problems

Everyone Loves a Dog Story: Narratives of Urban Animal Welfare Policy

2017

Public policy related to animal issues has not been well explored in the urban politics literature. We argue that concerns related to animal welfare are increasingly pressing in many cities yet sustained attention to them appears absent from the urban policy agenda. Using the multiple streams approach, this research examines animal welfare policy in the urban context and suggests why this policy area appears not to have gained a consistent place on the public agenda. Based on a content analysis of media reporting in the Detroit metropolitan area it appears that policy entrepreneurs were unable to access the public agenda through the policy window opened by a major focusing event because of conflicting narratives about the nature of the problem, dissension among policy entrepreneurs themselves, and a lack of debate about potential policy solutions.

View more

Sudden Versus Slow Death of Cities: New Orleans and Detroit”

Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race

2017

This paper constitutes a follow-up to an argument made during the late fall of 2005 that posited that many of the approaches and responses to sudden natural disasters might be effectively applied to areas experiencing more chronic economic decay. Using census, budgetary, and political data, including an analysis of planning and development documents, the paper addresses the following research questions: •

What were the economic and social trajectories of Detroit and New Orleans prior to their respective disasters?

View more

Show All +