Martha Jackman

Professor, Faculty of Law, Common Law Section University of Ottawa

  • Ottawa ON

Martha Jackman specializes in constitutional law, with a particular focus on issues relating to women and other marginalized groups

Contact

Biography

Martha Jackman, B.A. (Queen’s), LL.B. (Toronto), LL.M. (Yale), specializes in constitutional law, with a particular focus on issues relating to women and other marginalized groups. She joined the Faculty of Law at the University of Ottawa in 1988. She publishes primarily in the areas of socio-economic rights, equality and the Canadian Charter. She appears regularly before law reform bodies, lawyers, judges and parliamentary committees and has acted as legal counsel in a number of important Charter test cases. She is a member of the National Steering Committee of the National Association of Women and the Law and a former member of Equality Rights Panel of the Court Challenges Program of Canada and of the Board of Directors of the Women’s Legal Education and Action Fund (LEAF). In 2007, she received the Law Society of Upper Canada Medal for her contributions to the profession and in 2015, was the recipient of the Canadian Bar Association’s Touchstone Award.
Biographie

Martha Jackman, B.A. (Queen’s), LL.B. (Toronto), LL.M. (Yale), est une spécialiste du droit constitutionnel. Elle s’intéresse également aux problèmes juridiques liés à la protection des femmes et des groupes défavorisés. Elle publie principalement dans le domaine des droits socio-économiques ainsi que de l'égalité et la Charte canadienne. Elle comparaît régulièrement en matière de droit constitutionnel et de politique sociale devant des commissions des droits de la personne, des regroupements de juristes et de juges ainsi que des comités parlementaires et ses compétences sont recherchées en matière de contentieux constitutionnel. Elle est membre du Conseil de direction de l’Association nationale femmes et droit et ancienne membre du Conseil de direction des Fonds d’action et d’éducation juridiques des femmes ainsi que du Comité des droits à l’égalité du Programme de contestation judiciaire du Canada.. En 2007, on lui a décerné la médaille du Barreau du Haut-Canada, un honneur attribué chaque année à des juristes ayant grandement contribué à la profession. En 2015 elle a mérité les Prix ‘Les Assises’ de l’Association du barreau canadien.

Industry Expertise

Education/Learning
Legal Services
Research

Areas of Expertise

Constitutional Law
Charter of Rights
Women
Marginalized Groups
Access to Health Care

Accomplishments

Touchstone Award, Canadian Bar Association

2015

Law Society of Upper Canada Medal

2007

University of Victoria Law Students Society First Year Teaching Award

2004

Show All +

Education

Yale Law School

LL.M.

1988

University of Toronto, Faculty of Law

LL.B.

1985

Queen's University

B.A.

1981

Affiliations

  • National Steering Committee National Association of Women and the Law/Association nationale Femmes et Droit : Member (Co Chair 2012 - )
  • Journal of Law and Equality : Member of the Editorial Advisory Board
  • Law Society of Upper Canada : Member
  • Association des juristes d’expression française de l’Ontario : Member
  • National Association of Women and the Law : Member

Languages

  • English
  • French

Media Appearances

Beware the spin in charter challenge to public health care

Regina Leader-Post  

2016-09-20

Since the inception of medicare in Canada, opinion polls in all parts of the country consistently show that a vast majority of Canadians believe in equal access to health care based on need, not ability to pay...

View More

Martha Jackman: B.C. medicare case argues for wrong prescription

Our Windsor  

2016-09-15

Since the inception of medicare in Canada, opinion polls in all parts of the country consistently show a vast majority of Canadians believe in equal access to health care based on need, not ability to pay.

Yet this is precisely what is at stake in the Charter challenge against medicare taking place in the B.C. Supreme Court this week. Dr. Brian Day, one of the founders of the Cambie Surgery Centre, is contesting restrictions on doctors working in the public health system from also charging “extra fees” that would be paid for privately — out-of-pocket by patients or through private health insurance...

View More

P.E.I. abortion rights group to sue province for not providing access to procedure

Toronto Star  

2016-01-05

Martha Jackman, a constitutional law expert, said it will be difficult for the province to argue that it shouldn’t provide an insured medical service more than two decades after the Supreme Court of Canada found the country’s abortion law unconstitutional.

“This is an absolutely meritorious claim and I can’t imagine that it wouldn’t be successful,” said Jackman, a law professor at the University of Ottawa.

“Abortion is a medically necessary service that only women use and the fact that it is unavailable in P.E.I. is clear sex discrimination.”...

View More

Show All +

Research Grants

Reconceiving Human Rights Practice for the New Social Rights Paradigm

Community-University Research Alliance Program, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada

2009 - 2015

The project explores the conceptual and practical foundations for a new community-based human rights approach to poverty and inequality in Canada.

View more

Reconceiving Human Rights Practice for the New Social Rights Paradigm

Community-University Research Alliance Program, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada

2008 - 2009

Letter of Intent funding awarded to prepare an application for a second five-year CURA project.

Social Rights Accountability Project

Community-University Research Alliance Program, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada

2004 - 2009

The project examines domestic and international mechanisms and norms for holding Canadian governments accountable for policies and actions affecting the enjoyment of socio-economic rights.

Show All +

Articles

The Future of Health Care Accountability: A Human Rights Approach

Ottawa Law Review

2016

The paper argues that there is an urgent need in Canada for a human rights approach to health care accountability. Taking as its starting point that health care decision-making must respect Canadian Charter and international human rights guarantees, the paper contends that accountability mechanisms, both in relation to the overall performance of the health care system and individual access to care, must be designed to reflect and reinforce these fundamental human rights principles, not only as a matter of domestic and international legal obligation, but in order to be effective. To make this case, the paper first provides a brief overview of the concrete steps governments have taken towards implementing the various accountability reforms that have been put forward in Canada over the past twenty years. It then considers the implications of the absence of a human rights approach to health care accountability, particularly for those whose needs are least well served within the current system. The paper goes on to suggest that what is required, moving forward, is not only the recognition that health care is a fundamental right, but the creation of institutions and mechanisms capable of enforcing that right at both the access to care and system performance levels. The paper points to the Alternative Social Charter as one possible model for achieving effective accountability within the health care system: a critical reform for the future of health and human rights in Canada.

View more

Rights Based Strategies to Address Homelessness and Poverty in Canada: The Charter Framework

Advancing Social Rights in Canada

2014

This chapter explores the extent to which a domestic constitutional framework exists for a rights-based approach to housing and anti-poverty strategies in Canada, compatible with, and informed by, international human rights law and jurisprudence. Particular attention is paid to four Canadian constitutional provisions: 1) the commitment to provide public services of reasonable quality to all Canadians, under section 36 of the Constitution Act, 1982; the right to life, liberty, and security of the person, under section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms; the right to equal protection and equal benefit of the law, under section 15 of the Charter; and Canadian governments’ obligation, under section 1 of the Charter, to balance and limit rights in a manner that is reasonable and demonstrably justifiable.

View more

Charter Equality at Twenty: Reflections of a Card-Carrying Member of the Court Party

National Journal of Constitutional Law

2006

On the twentieth anniversary of the Canadian Charter's equality guarantees, the author reviews the record of Charter litigation as a means to redress inequalities in Canada and concludes that it is mixed at best. Far from undermining Canadian democracy, the Charter provides an important and legitimate avenue for challenging growing social inequities. Yet, low income litigants invoking the Charter have met with limited success due to a series of presumptions, including that social policy is beyond the legitimate purview of the courts, and that the state is neutral in its dealings with the poor. All in all, the author suggests, the relationship between rights and democracy is far more nuanced than the Charter critics argue, and the real question is not whether the Charter and the so-called Court Party are destroying democracy, but rather how the Charter's equality rights can inform and contribute to further strengthening the underlying values of our democratic system.

View more

Show All +