Professor Mike Slattery is Director of the Institute for Environmental Studies and Lead Scientist on the TCU-Oxford-Nextera Wind Research Initiative at Texas Christian University. Originally from South Africa, he is an internationally-trained geographer and environmental scientist: his Bachelor’s is from the University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Masters from the University of Toronto, Canada, and Ph.D. from the University of Oxford, England. He has written more than 70 scientific articles, published a book on environmental issues, and has testified before the U.S. Congress. In 2007 he was awarded the Dean’s Research and Creative Activity Award at TCU. He serves on the editorial board of the Annals of the Association of American Geographers and on the executive research board of the Texas Institute.
Mike has worked in diverse landscapes ranging from the Namib Desert in southern Africa to the cloud forests of Costa Rica. In 2008 he helped establish a research station and several biodiversity and conservation programs in Costa Rica, including a Green Macaw Protection Initiative. His research expertise is on human impact on the environment, especially river systems, and he teaches courses on the environment, soils, hydrology, and climate. He lives in Fort Worth.
Areas of Expertise (4)
Mercury Contamination from Coal-fired Power Plants
Human Impact to Coastal Plains, Rivers and Sediment Pathways
Texas Sierra Club Special Service Award
Association of International Educators (NAFSA) Senator Paul Simon Spotlight Award for TCU Rhino Initiative
College of Science and Engineering Award for Distinguished Achievement as a Creative Teacher and Scholar (Chancellor’s Award Finalist)
Earth Day Texas Technology Prize (with Downwindersatrisk)
College of Science and Engineering Dean’s Research Award, Texas Christian University
St. John's College and School of Geography, University of Oxford: D.Phil 1994
Department of Geography, University of Toronto: M.Sc. 1990
University of the Witwatersrand: B.A. (Hons.), Physical Geography 1988
University of the Witwatersrand: B.A., Geography and History of Art 1987
- American Geophysical Union
- Association of American Geographers
- Geological Society of America
- British Geomorphological Research Group
- British Hydrological Society
- British Society of Soil Science
- International Association of Geomorphologists
Media Appearances (5)
Rhino Poacher Killed by Elephant and Eaten by Lions, Officials Say
The New York Times
“It’s one of the most expensive wildlife products on the illegal market and that’s why these poachers go after it,” Michael Slattery, founder of the Texas Christian University Rhino Initiative, said on Sunday. “The current prices for a rhino horn are anywhere from $15,000 to $50,000 a kilogram. They are seeing dollar signs. It is more expensive than gold and cocaine, so the demand is driving these poachers.”...
Climate for Change
Fort Worth Weekly
Not so, says Michael Slattery, TCU professor and director of the Institute for Environmental Studies. The scholar and environmental scientist has served on the university’s faculty for more than 20 years. In that time, he has seen the campus and Fort Worth as a whole make important strides toward sustainability. The sprawling campus now uses state-of-the-art insulation, and any new buildings must meet rigorous environmental guidelines, he said...
TCU Rhino Initiative charges forward to stop poaching
Dr. Michael Slattery, director of the Institute for Environmental Studies, launched the Rhino Initiative in 2014 as part of TCU’s Global Innovator program. “Even though it seems like [rhino poaching] is a problem in another country so far away and we’re not touched by it, it is a global problem,” Slattery said. “If we lose this species, then what’s the next species?”...
Is Wildlife Trafficking a National Security Threat?
Michael Slattery, an Irish national and alleged member of the criminal organization known as the Rathkeale Rovers, was arrested in 2013 for selling rhino horns in New York for $50,000. The Rovers, who are described as “tight-knit extended family groups that live a nomadic lifestyle” by the Department of Justice, are alleged to regularly trade rhinoceros horns on the black market...
TCU’s connections in Costa Rica provide opportunities for students
“One of our guides on a trip in 2006, who was also a National Geographic guide, had a friend who owned a farm in the forest and was trying to rehabilitate it,” said Dr. Michael Slattery, the director of the Institute for Environmental Studies. “He wanted to build an educational center there and it seemed like the perfect opportunity.”...
Event Appearances (5)
The African Rhino Conservation Collaboration (ARCC): An update from the field
American Association of Geographers Annual Meeting, New Orleans, 2018
Quantifying changes in near-surface soil moisture and temperature during prescribed fire under three fuel loads
9th International Conference on Geomorphology, New Delhi, India, 2017
The African Rhino Conservation Collaboration (ARCC): A strategy to protect rhino in the Eastern Cape of South Africa
American Association of Geographers Annual Meeting, Boston, 2017
Community-based conservation models and their application to the rhino crisis in South Africa
American Association of Geographers Annual Meeting, Boston, 2017
“Utility-scale wind energy projects: Managing public perception and environmental risk
World Future Energy Summit, invited Tech Talk, Abu Dhabi, 2017
Research Grants (5)
Local community-based rhino protection, conservation training and education
Disney Conservation Fund $49,625
2017 Co-Pi with Dr. Tory Bennett – under review
TCU Visiting Scholars Award
Texas Christian University $7,500
2016 With Kathy Cavins-Tull
TCU Instructional/equipment grant for Costa Rica weather station
Texas Christian University $12,943
2016 With Dean Williams
TCU Global Innovator Award
Texas Christian University $25,000
Integrating wind energy into our ecological communities: Phase II
Nextera Energy Resources $1,321,032
2013 - 2015 Co-PI with Amanda Hale, Victoria Bennett and Becky Johnson
Sediment Source Fingerprinting: Transforming From a Research Tool to a Management ToolAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association
Mukundan, R., Walling, D.E., Gellis, A.C., Slattery, M.C. and Radcliffe, D.E.
2012 Information on the nature and relative contribution of different watershed sediment sources is recognized as a key requirement in the design and implementation of targeted management strategies for sediment control. A direct method of assessing sediment sources in a watershed that has attracted attention in recent years is sediment fingerprinting. The aim of this article is to describe the development of sediment fingerprinting as a research tool and to consider how the method might be transformed from a research tool to a management tool within a regulatory framework, with special reference to the United States total maximum daily load (TMDL) program. When compared with the current source assessment tools in developing sediment TMDLs, sediment fingerprinting offers considerable improvement as a tool for quantifying sources of sediment in terms of source type (e.g., channel vs. hillslope) as well as spatial location (subwatershed). While developing a conceptual framework for sediment TMDLs, we recognize sediment fingerprinting along with sediment budgeting and modeling as valuable tools in the TMDL process for developing justifiable sediment TMDLs. The discussions presented in this article may be considered as a first step toward streamlining the sediment fingerprinting approach for its wider application in a regulatory framework.
The predominance of economic development in the support for large-scale wind farms in the US Great PlainsRenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Slattery, M.C., Johnson, B.L., Swofford, J.A. and Pasqualetti, M.J.
2012 Wind energy is one of the fastest growing sources of power generation in the world. While general public and political support for wind energy is often high, siting wind farms frequently raises concerns in local communities, and individual projects often fail because of effective public opposition. This paper presents the results of a postal and online survey questionnaire that explores public perceptions of wind energy in two of the most important states for wind development, Texas and Iowa. The goal is a better understanding of public reactions to large-scale wind developments as a prerequisite of more widespread use of renewable energy resources. We found a high level of public support for wind energy, with more than two-thirds of respondents being in favor of building more wind farms either in their community or within the U.S. as a whole. Given that the majority of respondents had a very high level of concern for the general environment, we also found that almost two-thirds of respondents counter-intuitively indicated that producing electricity using fossil fuels is not detrimental to the environment, and that they had little concern for global climate change. Our results suggest that arguing for more renewable sources of energy based on reducing our carbon footprint is less persuasive in these communities than simply approaching it from the perspective of wind being a clean and safe source of energy. More than two-thirds of respondents felt their county had benefited economically from the wind farms and that they were a source of job creation in the county. Support for wind power in these communities is associated far more with socioeconomic factors than foundational aesthetic or moral values, with wind farms perceived as the vehicle that will reverse economic decline.
State and local economic impacts from wind energy projects: Texas case studyEnergy Policy
Slattery, M.C., Lantz, E. and Johnson, B.L.
2011 This paper uses the Jobs and Economic Development Impacts (JEDI) model to estimate economic impacts from 1398 MW of wind power development in four counties in west Texas. Project-specific impacts are estimated at the local level (i.e., within a 100-mile radius around the wind farms) and at the state level. The primary economic policy question addressed is how investment in wind energy affects the state and local communities where the wind farms are built. During the four-year construction phase approximately 4100 FTE (full time equivalents) jobs were supported with turbine and supply chain impacts accounting for 58% of all jobs generated. Total lifetime economic activity to the state from the projects equated to more than $1.8 billion, or $1.3 million per MW of installed capacity. The total economic activity to the local communities was also substantial, equating to nearly $730 million over the assumed 20-year life cycle of the farms, or $0.52 million per MW of installed capacity. Given the current level of impacts observed, and the potential for increased impacts via greater utilization of instate manufacturing capacity and the development of trained wind industry specific laborers, Texas appears to be well positioned to see increasing impacts from continued wind development.
Controls on sediment delivery in coastal plain riversJournal of Environmental Management
Slattery, M.C. and Phillips, J.D.
2011 Rivers crossing coastal plains are often inefficient conveyors of sediment, so that changes in upstream sediment dynamics are not evident at the river mouth. Extensive accommodation space and low stream power often result in extensive alluvial storage upstream of estuaries and correspondingly low sediment loads at the river mouth. However, gaging stations with sediment records are typically well upstream of the coast, and thus tend to overestimate sediment yields by under-representing the lower coastal plain and because there is often a net loss of sediment in lower coastal plain reaches. Studies of alluvial sediment storage have generally focused on accommodation space, but, using examples from Texas, we show that low transport capacity controlled largely by slope is a crucial factor.
Holocene sediment accretion in the Trinity River delta, Texas, in relation to modern fluvial inputJournal of Soils and Sediments
Slattery, M.C., Todd, L.M., Phillips, J.D. and Breyer, J.A.
2010 This study uses sediment cores to quantify Holocene sedimentation rates in the Trinity River delta, Texas. An important question is whether modern fluvial sediment input from the Trinity River is adequate to sustain sedimentation in the delta, thereby combating subsidence and further wetland loss. Our objective was to quantify sedimentation rates within the delta in order to assess whether the delta is in- or out-of-phase with modern sediment delivery rates.