Nicholas Z. Muller

Professor Carnegie Mellon University

  • Pittsburgh PA

Nicholas Muller works at the intersection of environmental policy and economics.

Contact

Carnegie Mellon University

View more experts managed by Carnegie Mellon University

Biography

Nicholas Z. Muller works at the intersection of environmental policy and economics. His interdisciplinary research projects focus on estimating individual discount rates and risk preferences using historical pricing data, comparing air pollution and climate damages from electric vehicles to conventional vehicles, estimating air pollution damage from energy production, measuring the impact of transporting freight in the United State on air pollution and climate, and analyzing the inequality in market and augmented measures of income.

Areas of Expertise

Economics
Air Pollution
Environmental Policy
Freight Transportation
Market Inequality

Media Appearances

Wildfire smoke associated with 20,000 premature deaths and billions in damages

Pittsburgh Post-Gazette  online

2025-05-04

CMU scientists project that wildfires were associated with 20,000 premature deaths and $200 billion in damages across the country in 2017. “These [air pollution] damages from wildfires are comparable to the [air pollution damages] from the entire manufacturing sector in the U.S., which is staggering,” said Nicholas Muller (Tepper School of Business)

View More

Wildfire smoke and prescribed burns caused 20,000 early deaths and billions in damages in just one year

MSN  online

2025-04-09

A new study led by Nicholas Muller (Tepper School of Business) estimates that wildfire and prescribed burn smoke caused $200 billion in health damages and 20,000 premature deaths in 2017, with senior citizens and marginalized communities suffering the most.

View More

Regulators underrate air pollution mortality by $100B, ignore racial gaps: study

The Hill  online

2021-12-21

“Underlying mortality rates, pollution exposure and pollution vulnerability differ significantly across racial and ethnic groups,” Nicholas Z. Muller, study co-author and a professor of economics, engineering and public policy at Carnegie Mellon University’s Tepper School of Business, said in a statement.

View More

Show All +

Social

Industry Expertise

Energy
International Trade and Development
Air Freight/Courier Services

Accomplishments

United States Environmental Protection Agency Scientific and Technological Achievement Award, Level II

2013

Education

University of Oregon

B.S.

Public Policy, Planning and Management

1996

Indiana University

M.P.A.

Environmental Policy & Public Financial Administration

2002

Yale University

Ph.D.

Environmental and Natural Resource Economics

2007

Affiliations

  • Wilton E. Scott Institute for Energy Innovation

Articles

Marginal abatement costs for greenhouse gas emissions in the United States using an energy systems approach

Environmental Research Energy

2025

Deep decarbonization requires fundamental changes in meeting energy service demands, with some efforts increasing overall costs. Examining abatement measures in isolation, however, fails to capture their interactive effects within the energy system. Here we show the abatement costs of decarbonization in the United States using an energy system optimization model to capture technological interactions, multi-decadal path dependence, and endogenous end-use technology selection. Energy-system-wide net-zero CO2-eq emissions are achieved in 2050 at a cost under $400 per tonne CO2-eq, led by emissions reductions in power generation, end-use electrification of ground transportation, space heating, and some industrial applications. Differences in mitigation costs and CO2 geological storage potential lead to regional heterogeneities in mitigation rates and residual emissions. The marginal abatement cost curves show that additional decarbonization comes at higher incremental costs, this cost penalty decreases over time, and substantially greater abatement occurs in future time periods at the same abatement cost.

View more

Funding a Just Transition Away from Coal in the U.S. Considering Avoided Damage from Air Pollution

Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis

2024

Coal is declining in the U.S. as part of the clean energy transition, resulting in remarkable air pollution benefits for the American public and significant costs for the industry. Using the AP3 integrated assessment model, we estimate that fewer emissions of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and primary fine particulate matter driven by coal's decline led to $300 billion in benefits from 2014 to 2019. Conversely, we find that job losses driven by less coal plant and mining activity resulted in $7.84 billion in foregone wages over the same timeframe. While the benefits were greatly distributed (mostly throughout the East), costs were highly concentrated in coal communities. Transferring a small fraction of the benefits to workers could cover these costs while maintaining societal net benefits. Forecasting coal fleet damages from 2020 to 2035, we find that buying out or replacing these plants would result in $589 billion in air quality benefits, which considerably outweigh the costs. The return on investment increases when policy targets the most damaging capacity, and net benefits are maximized when removing just facilities where marginal benefits exceed marginal costs. Evaluating competitive reverse auction policy designs akin to Germany's Coal Exit Act, we find that adjusting bids based on monetary damages rather than based only on carbon dioxide emissions - the German design - provides a welfare advantage. Our benefit-cost analyses clearly support policies that drive a swift and just transition away from coal, thereby clearing the air while supporting communities needing assistance.

View more

Climate Policy Reduces Racial Disparities in Air Pollution from Transportation and Power Generation

Environmental Science & Technology

2024

Energy system optimization models facilitate analyses on a national or regional scale. However, understanding the impacts of climate policy on specific populations requires a much higher spatial resolution. Here, we link an energy system optimization model to an integrated assessment model via an emission downscaling algorithm, translating air pollution emissions from nine U.S. regions to U.S. counties. We simulate the impacts of six distinct policy scenarios, including a current policy and a 2050 net-zero target, on NO x , SO2, and PM2.5 emissions from on-road transportation and electricity generation. We compare different policies based on their ability to reduce emission exposure and exposure disparity across racial groups, allowing decision-makers to assess the air pollution impacts of various policy instruments more holistically. Modeled policies include a clean electricity standard, an on-road ICE vehicle ban, a carbon tax, and a scenario that reaches net-zero GHG emissions by 2050. While exposure and disparities decrease in all scenarios, our results reveal persistent disparities until at least 2040, particularly for Black non-Hispanic Americans. Our estimates of avoided deaths due to air pollution emphasize the importance of policy timing, showing that thousands of lives can be saved by taking action in the near-term.

View more

Show All +