hero image
Prakash Kashwan, Ph.D. - University of Connecticut. Storrs, CT, US

Prakash Kashwan, Ph.D. Prakash Kashwan, Ph.D.

Associate Professor of Political Science | University of Connecticut

Storrs, CT, UNITED STATES

Prakash Kashwan is an expert in the field of political economy of institutions, environmental politics, and global climate governance.

Biography

Professor Kashwan's research and scholarship focuses on political economy of institutions, environmental policy and politics, global climate governance, and climate justice. He utilizes a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods, stemming from his first career in international development (1999-2005).

Kashwan teaches courses on the politics of the environment, environmental policy and institutions, and research methods.

Areas of Expertise (6)

Political Economy of Environment

Climate Governance

Political Affairs

Political Representation

Institutional Analysis

Economic Affairs

Education (3)

Indiana University: Ph.D., Public Policy & Environmental Affairs 2011

Indian Institute of Forest Management: M.S., Forestry Management 1999

Jai Narain Vyas University: B.Sc., Physics, Mathematics, and Electronics 1996

Accomplishments (1)

Young Scientist Research Award (professional)

2009-2011
Young Scientist Research Award, International Foundation for Science (IFS), Stockholm. $10,500

Social

Media

Publications:

Prakash Kashwan, Ph.D. Publication

Documents:

Photos:

loading image loading image

Videos:

Voices on Forests with Prakash Kashwan Day out with a Human Star- Live interview with Dr. Prakash Kashwan Talk by Prakash Kashwan: 'Institutional Reforms & Effective Delivery of Entitlements'

Audio:

Media Appearances (4)

‘Indigenous people have been effective stewards of biodiversity globally’

DownToEarth  online

2019-05-13

Prakash Kashwan is an associate professor in the Political Science department at the University of Connecticut, United States. His research, scholarship, and teaching focuses on climate justice, global climate governance, international and environmental policy and politics, and political economy of development. He speaks to Ishan Kukreti on his work, Democracy in the Woods: Environmental Conservation and Social Justice in India, Tanzania, and Mexico....

view more

A Fight for the Forest

The Hindu  online

2019-03-07

Objections to the FRA are often framed as an issue of wildlife conservation versus people’s rights, with no mention of these bigger players who might benefit from this framing. In a 2013 study, professor Prakash Kashwan noted how political this framing can be. He wrote that in 2006, well before the FRA implementation started, the Environment Ministry directed State governments to declare all existing Protected Areas as critical tiger habitats, so that they would not be controlled under this Act...

view more

An Archaic Conservationists' Bias Haunts the Forest Rights Act

The Wire  online

2019-03-05

Prakash Kashwan, a scholar of the political economy of environment and development, argues that it could be a “result of the patronising attitude among many conservationists, which makes them argue that Adivasi lives in forests produce nothing more than poverty and misery. This mistaken belief allows them to make the rather presumptuous assertion that Adivasis should be brought out of the forests, which should be freed of all human interference...”

view more

As Climate Risks Rise, Scientists Call for Rules on Solar Engineering

Voice of America  online

2018-10-01

Intellectual property around the technologies would not have to be in the public domain, "but it should be in the public interest," said Prakash Kashwan, a University of Connecticut political science professor and report author...

view more

Articles (6)

Rethinking power and institutions in the shadows of neoliberalism: (An introduction to a special issue of World Development) World Development

2019

Despite the recognition that institutions matter for international development, the debates over institutional reforms tend to obscure the role of power. Neoliberal models of development are often promoted in terms of their technical merits and efficiency gains and rarely account for the multiple ways that social, economic and political power shape institutional design and institutional change.

view more

Time to Hold Powerful Forestry Agencies and Conservation Actors to Account The Wire

2019

During field research in Kanha National Park, Adivasi villagers shared what sounded like a joke: they claimed that tigers chased and circled by tourist jeeps often ran out of the core zone of the national park to find refuge in the relative tranquility of neighbouring forest villages....

view more

Inequality, democracy, and the environment: A cross-national analysis Ecological Economics

2017

This paper joins the debate on the relationship between inequality and the environment. Departing from the past contributions, which focused either on the theories of environmental behavior or on economic interests, this paper develops arguments about “political choice” mechanisms that help explain the linkages between inequality and national policymaking related to the establishment of protected areas. A cross-national analysis of the interactions between inequality, democracy and the legal designation of protected areas in a global sample of 137 countries shows that, ceteris paribus, the effects of inequality vary depending on the strength of democracy: in relatively democratic countries inequality is associated with less land in protected areas, whereas in relatively undemocratic countries the reverse is true. The highly significant effects of inequality undermine the democratic dividend in the arena of nature conservation.

view more

Integrating power in institutional analysis: A micro-foundation perspective Journal of Theoretical Politics

2016

Studies of social dilemmas consistently report higher than expected levels of cooperation, especially in the presence of appropriate institutions. At the same time, scholars have argued that institutions are manifestations of power relations. The higher than expected levels of cooperation amidst widespread power asymmetries constitute an important puzzle about the linkages between power asymmetries and the outcomes of local institutional deliberation.

view more

Governments, not people, tend to benefit from land conservation The Washington Post

2016

The United States is celebrating the centennial of its National Park Service, kicking off a proud “second century of stewardship and engaging communities through recreation, conservation, and historic preservation programs.”

view more

Forest Policy, Institutions, and REDD+ in India, Tanzania, and Mexico Global Environmental Politics

2015

This article investigates forest policies and institutions surrounding REDD+ in three heavily forested countries: India, Tanzania, and Mexico. The comparative analysis leads to three key insights. First, each of the case study countries has multiple land tenure statutes that result in different distributions of the costs and benefits of forest protection for key stakeholders.

view more