Sarah Treul is Bowman and Gordon Gray Term Professor of political science in UNC's College of Arts and Sciences. She specializes in American political institutions, with an emphasis on the U.S. Congress and courts. She earner her B.A. in Political Science and Psychology from Wellesley College and her M.A and Ph.D. (both in Political Science) from the University of Minnesota. Her research interests include the voting behavior of U.S. senators, bicameralism, and state delegations in Congress. She is currently working on a project analyzing how a decline in state economic interests has contributed to polarization in Congress.
Areas of Expertise (6)
Bowman and Gordon Gray Term Professorship (professional)
The highest teaching honor in the College of Arts and Sciences (2019-2024)
Honors Carolina’s Manekin Family Teaching Award (professional)
Tanner Award for Excellence in Undergraduate Teaching (professional)
University of Minnesota: Ph.D., Political Science and Government 2009
University of Minnesota: M.A., Political Science 2008
Wellesley College: B.A., Political Science and Psychology 2003
- Member American Political Science Association
- Member Midwest Political Science Association
Media Appearances (5)
Grand Divisions Episode 14: Why voters like, or don't like, political outsiders
Nashville Tennessean (part of the USA Today network) online
Sarah Treul, an associate professor of political science at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, joined the podcast to discuss the history of the political outsider. Treul explains how outsiders elsewhere have fared and what factors to consider as the Lee and Dean race heats up.
Can Science Save Politics? Or Will Politics Ruin Science?
Incumbency is still the primary factor that determines whether a candidate will win an election, said Sarah Treul, a professor of political science at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Inexperienced candidates are becoming more common, but only in one party
Republicans are electing more inexperienced candidates than they used to, and more than Democrats.
The Tea Party’s presence in primaries benefits the general election result in the Republican Party’s favor.
LSA US Centre online
With the rise in prominence and influence of conservative politicians such as Senators Ted Cruz and Rand Paul in recent years, the role of the Tea Party in U.S. politics has become more and more important. In new research, Caitlin E. Jewitt and Sarah A. Treul examine how the presence of a Tea Party candidate – a divisive election – affects general election results compared to elections that are simply competitive. They find that competitive primaries increase turnout rates, but do little for a party’s election result. They also find that while the presence of a Tea Party candidate in the general election means that the Republican Party performs 1.7 percent better than expected, when there had been a competitive primary, there is no additional effect...
A 5-4 Vote Against? Or 6-3 in Favor?
March 29, 2012
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments this week on the constitutionality of the 2010 health care reform law. ...
A state-of-the-art model created by professors Ryan Black of Michigan State, Sarah Treul of the University of North Carolina, Timothy Johnson of the University of Minnesota, and Jerry Goldman of Chicago-Kent College of Law suggests that the court will declare the individual mandate unconstitutional by a 5-4 vote
Event Appearances (1)
"Consider This ... The 2016 Elections"
Sponsored by the UNC General Alumni Association UNC-Chapel Hill campus
ABSTRACT: We examine the effects of competitiveness and divisiveness in the 2010 congressional election, as the emergence of the Tea Party resulted in many competitive Republican primaries and highlighted significant divisions within the party. We find that ...
ABSTRACT: In the current era of polarization, bipartisanship between a president and senators of the opposite party seems unlikely. Yet, we expect that given a senator's desire to please his constituents and ensure reelection, if a president is popular with constituents in a ...
ABSTRACTS: Students of linguistics and psychology demonstrate that word choices people make convey information about their emotions and thereby their intentions. Focusing on theory from these related fields we test whether the emotional content of Supreme Court justices' ...
ABSTRACT: This paper tests whether Supreme Court justices tip their hands at oral arguments. Specifically, we test whether, when justices ask more questions of one side, that side is more likely to lose their case. The findings support the theory; namely, when justices ask more ...
ABSTRACT: This article examines the role progressive ambition plays in the US Senate. I analyze the effect ambition has on party loyalty in the upper chamber. The theoretical argument is that senators with ambition for higher office are more loyal to the party than ...