Scott Imberman

Professor Michigan State University

  • East Lansing MI

Education expert and economist, focusing on policy issues in K-12 and higher education

Contact

Michigan State University

View more experts managed by Michigan State University

Media

Biography

Scott Imberman is economist who specializes in the economics of education and education policy. His research focuses on issues in domestic education and he has recently studied charter schools, classroom peer-effects, accountability, bilingual education, gifted education, teacher incentive pay, in-school breakfast and school uniforms. Currently he is researching the labor market returns to higher education, the economic determinants and implications of autism, and the economics of educating students with disabilities. He is also a research associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research.

Industry Expertise

Public Policy
Education/Learning
Research
Writing and Editing

Areas of Expertise

Economics of Education
Education Policy
School Choice
Teacher Incentives
Special Education
Autism Spectrum Disorder

Education

University of Maryland

Ph.D.

News

Michigan's online-only districts catch flak for holding 'virtual snow day'

The Detroit News  online

2021-02-16

At least five Michigan online-only school districts gave students a “virtual snow day” even though most teachers, staff members and students could work Tuesday from the safety of their homes. Since school districts have six snow days available each year, they may be weighing the pros and cons of using those days rather than allowing them to lapse, said Scott Imberman, professor of economics and education policy at Michigan State University. But the overriding concern likely were the teachers and students who have to travel for wireless access, Imberman said. "That, I think, is a particularly practical, important issue in making these determinations," he said.

View More

Why gifted education may not be a smart idea

The Globe and Mail  online

2018-05-03

Is gifted education a bright idea?

Research by University of Houston economists Sa Bui, Steven G. Craig, and Scott Imberman, presented at the recent Society of Labor Economists meeting in Vancouver, suggests that sometimes it isn't.

The authors study a large urban school district in the American south west - "LUSD-SW" - with a gifted program similar to that found in many Canadian school districts.

View More

Why majoring in business can nearly double your earnings potential

MarketWatch  online

2017-07-19

Students who major in business, which for years has topped lists of most popular majors, earn between 81% and 130% more 12 years out of college than similarly talented students who don’t major in the field, according to a working paper distributed this week by the National Bureau of Economic Research, a Cambridge, Mass.-based research group.

View More

Show All +

Journal Articles

Capitalization of charter schools into residential property values

Education Finance and Policy

Margaret Brehm , Scott A. Imberman, Michael Naretta

2017

Although prior research has found clear impacts of schools and school quality on property values, little is known about whether charter schools have similar effects. Using sale price data for residential properties in Los Angeles County from 2008 to 2011 we estimate the neighborhood level impact of charter schools on housing prices. Using an identification strategy that relies on census-block fixed effects and variation in charter penetration over time, we find little evidence that the availability of a charter school affects housing prices on average. We do find, however, that when restricting to districts other than Los Angeles Unified and counting only charter schools located in the same school district as the household, housing prices fall in response to an increase in nearby charter penetration.

View more

Risky Business? The Effect of Majoring in Business on Earnings and Educational Attainment

National Bureau of Economic Research

Rodney J Andrews, Michael F Lovenheim, Scott Imberman

2017

One of the most important decisions a student can make during the course of his or her college career is the choice of major. The field of study a student selects translates directly into the types of skills and knowledge he or she will obtain during college, and it can influence the type of career chosen after postsecondary education ends. Business is one of the most popular majors in the US, accounting for 19% of all college degrees granted. We study the impact of choosing a business major using a regression discontinuity design that exploits GPA cutoffs for switching majors in some Texas universities. Even though nearly 60% of marginal business majors would have majored in a STEM field otherwise, we find large and statistically significant increases in earnings of 80% to 130% 12+ years after college entry, driven mainly by women. These are considerably larger than OLS estimates that condition on a rich set of demographic, high school achievement, and high school fixed-effects controls, which is consistent with students choosing majors based on comparative advantage. We do not find statistically significant effects of majoring in business on educational outcomes, except for positive effects on male 6-year graduation rates.

View more

Achievement effects of individual performance incentives in a teacher merit pay tournament

Labour Economics

Margaret Brehma, Scott A. Imberman, Michael F.Lovenheim

2017

This paper examines the role of worker performance feedback and measurement precision in the design of incentive pay systems, specifically in the context of an individual teacher value-added merit pay tournament. We first build a model in which workers use proximity to an award threshold to update their beliefs about their own ability, which informs their expected marginal return to effort. The model predicts that effort will be maximized at some point proximal to but above the award threshold in order to maximize the likelihood of winning an award when effort translates into value-added with noise. As the noise in the value-added measure increases, teacher effort becomes less responsive to prior value-added because the value-added score becomes a less reliable measure of ability. Using administrative teacher-student linked data from Houston, we test the central prediction of the model that there should be excess achievement gains near award thresholds. The data strongly reject the existence of such excess gains. We argue that a likely reason for this lack of responsiveness is that the value-added measures used to determine awards were too noisy to provide informative feedback about one's ability.

View more

Show All +