Areas of Expertise (4)
Gender, Media and Pop Culture
Dr. Mackey-Kallis is the source to turn to for film analysis and commentary, particularly in regard to pop culture, gender, social media and political rhetoric. Her areas of expertise include the rhetoric of film, women in contemporary cinema, and myth in media and culture. Mackey-Kallis can also speak to issues surrounding political rhetoric, political campaign films, popular music and advertising.
The Pennsylvania State University: PhD
West Virginia University: MA
University of California, San Diego: BA
Select Accomplishments (6)
Consultant, American Council on Education (ACE), Center for Internationalization and Global Engagement, (CIGE) (professional)
Member and lead author, Internationalization Lab External Review Team for Emerson College’s European Center, Kasteel Well, Netherlands, fall 2014
Member, Internationalization Lab External Review Team:
Samford University, spring, 2014; Lewis University, spring 2015; Emerson College, fall, 2015
Director, Study Abroad in Greece Program, Villanova University (professional)
1997-present. Developed a summer study abroad program where Communication majors, minors and honors students earn six credits with two different Communication Department faculty in the areas of rhetoric and performance. In addition to lecture/discussion in traditional classroom spaces, students study ancient performance sites, see professional performances at these sites, and present their own original work.
Fulbright Lecturer, Tokyo, Japan (professional)
Chair, American Council on Education’s (ACE) Internationalization Lab (professional)
Villanova University, 2012-2014
Led a university-wide team to develop a strategic and comprehensive plan for university internationalization, in liaison with the ACE Internationalization Lab; reporting to the V.P.A.A.
American Council of Education (ACE) Fellowship (professional)
Office of the President, Bryn Mawr College
Lawrence C. Gallen Lifetime Faculty Service Award (professional)
Villanova University, 2008
- Phi Kappa Phi Honor Society, Member
- Member, Editorial Board, Review of Communication, 2006-2011
- Member, Editorial Board, Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 1999-2010
Select Media Appearances (6)
Pop culture blackout: Melania Trump missing from magazine covers, TV appearances
The Washington Times online
Villanova University communication professor Susan Mackey-Kallis noted that Mrs. Trump has given fewer speeches than either Mrs. Obama or Laura Bush, at least up until this point in the Trump presidency.
“She seems far more uncomfortable taking a place on the public stage than did her predecessors,” Ms. Mackey-Kallis said.
Media interest in the first lady’s whereabouts remains sky-high, she said. Witness the imbroglio surrounding Mrs. Trump’s extended public absence this year after kidney surgery.
Defining who is 'American' by the language they speak
The Philadelphia Inquirer online
When the Pew Research Center explored what traits are vital for people to be considered “one of us” in the United States and elsewhere, it found that majorities in every country believed speaking the dominant language was “very important.” By comparison, having been born in the country didn’t much matter.
“It’s so central to our identity — how other people see us comes from when we open our mouths,” said Susan Mackey-Kallis, who teaches communication at Villanova University.
Study: Female Professors Do More Service Work than Males
Voice of America radio
Susan Mackey-Kallis is a busy woman at Villanova University, outside of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Mackey-Kallis is an Associate Professor in Villanova’s Department of Communications. Like most professors in the United States, she has many responsibilities. Much of her job involves teaching classes on film, popular culture and the media. She also spends a lot of time doing research on those subjects. But there is another part of her job that does not get as much public attention: her service work for the school.
How Does Your Handshake Measure Up to Trump's 'clasp and Grab'?
Villanova University Communication Professor Susan Mackey-Kallis interpreted Trump’s handshake differently, also separating it out into two movements labelling them the “clasp and ‘yank’”.
She explains that the two movements “could signify a desire for reducing the interpersonal distance between the two individuals”, but that it could also “unsettle” those on the receiving end because it “violates the typical interpersonal space norm of one-and-a-half to two feet (0.5-0.6 m) by pulling the other individual into the ‘intimate’ space zone of approximately zero to one-and-a-half feet (0.6 m).”
Do This in Your Next Job Interview to Sound More Intelligent and Project Confidence
Of course, no one wants to lean on the crutches of "um" or "like" when we're speaking. Sometimes, we simply can't help it. Susan Mackey-Kallis, who teaches public speaking at at Villanova University, told The New York Times that these words tumble out of our mouths when we're trying to think of the next thing to say. As we are speaking, the cadence picks up, meaning our words get ahead of our thoughts.
So, Um, How Do You, Like, Stop Using Filler Words?
The New York Times
They often occur when we are trying to think of the next thing we are going to say, Susan Mackey-Kallis, an associate professor at Villanova University who teaches public speaking, said in an email.
When stakes are high or we are nervous — in a job or media interview, or during a speech, presentation or conference call — we tend not to breathe as much and we talk faster, so our words get ahead of our thoughts, Lisa B. Marshall, a communications expert and the author of “Smart Talk: The Public Speaker’s Guide to Success in Every Situation,” said in an interview.
Research Grants (3)
Summer Teaching Grant,
Villanova University Institute for Teaching and Learning (VITAL)
Summer Research Grant
College of Arts and Sciences, Villanova University
Summer Research Grant
The City University of New York
Select Academic Articles (5)
Johnston, B. and Mackey-Kallis, S
Communication Perspectives in Popular Culture (Series Editors: Andrew F. Herrmann and Art Herbig
Social websites like Facebook enable users to upload self-created digital images; it is therefore of interest to see how gender is performed in this domain. A panel used a literature review of pictorial features associated with gender traits, and a sample of Facebook pictures to assess gender stereotypes present in Facebook images. Traits emerging in greater prominence in pictures of males included active, dominant, and independent. Those prominent with female users included attractive and dependent. These findings generally conform to gender stereotypes found in prior research and extend the research regarding stereotypical gender traits displayed in professional media depictions to self-selected social media displays. They also extend the research on gender differences in impression management generally, in both interpersonal communication and social media, to include gender-specific traits that are part of young mens and women's impression management.
The films examined in Jung and Film: Post Jungian Takes on the Moving Image, according to editors Christopher Hauke and Ian Alister, provide a type of collective therapy for their audiences, offer a neccessary corrective to the one-sidedness of consciousness, warn of the impact of the marginalization of the collective unconsciousness, and articulate what it means to be human in a postmodern world.
This volume examines Oliver Stone the filmmaker and the debate over whether Stone is or is not an historian and, if so, what this means. This orientation, although allowing a healthy and often provocative polemic, often results in very little in-depth analysis of Stone's films; other volumes, such as Frank Beaver's Oliver Stone: Wake-up Cinema, Norman Kagan's The cinema of Oliver stone, and Susan Mackey-Kallis' Oliver Stone's America: Dreaming the Myth Outward provide more extensive film analysis and critique.
This essay investigates the various narrative “logics” in the 18‐minute film that preceded Ronald Reagan's acceptance speech at the 1984 Republican National Convention. A close‐reading unravels the narrative and meta‐narrative structures of the film activated through ceremony and history. Viewers are invited to view the film as the story of the Reagan presidency (a personal narrative) and the story of a Western/American hero (a cultural narrative). These stories create an emotional experience that invites the audience to participate as celebrants and “everyday” heroes betstowing their blessing upon Ronald Reagan's bid for the presidency.