Tim Cairney

Associate Professor Georgia Southern University

  • Statesboro GA

Professor Cairney's research includes concern voluntary disclosures, and the market for audit services

Contact

Georgia Southern University

View more experts managed by Georgia Southern University

Social

Biography

Tim Cairney, Ph.D., CA, is an associate professor of accounting at Georgia Southern University. He has an MBA from Dalhousie University and earned his professional designation from Institute of Chartered Accountants of Nova Scotia. Tim articled with Collins Barrow Maheu Noiseux and, subsequently, worked as controller for a small hospitality company. He returned for his doctorate at Virginia Tech, writing his dissertation on the credibility of voluntary disclosures. His research and publications concern voluntary disclosures, the market for audit services, and how industry competition impacts these areas. His teaching interests include performance measures and the how management accounting systems impact the achievement of goals.

Areas of Expertise

Accounting
Performance Measures
Audit Services
Management Accounting Systems

Accomplishments

School of Accountancy Research Award

2007

Charles R. Gibbs Faculty Award

2005

GSU Faculty Research Grant

2005

Education

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

PhD

Accounting

1995

Articles

Client Industry Characteristics and Auditor Changes

Review of Accounting and Finance

Cairney, Timothy D., Errol G.G. Stewart

2016

This study examines the association between audit report lag, the length of time between the fiscal yearend and the date the Auditors Report is signed, and client industry homogeneity, a measure of the similarity of operations of members of an industry. The evidence suggests that auditors complete audits of clients more quickly in more homogenous industries. There is a negative association between audit report lag and homogeneity which indicates that auditors are more efficient in audits in more homogenous industries. There is also a negative association between audit report lag and specialist audits in homogenous industries. Lastly, homogenous industry audits are better able to be completed by the compressed filing dates imposed by the SEC on accelerated and large accelerated filer in 2003 and 2006.

Audit Fees and Client Industry Homogeneity

Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory

Cairney, Timothy D., Errol G.G. Stewart

2015

This study examines the relationship between a client industry's homogeneity and audit fees. We assume that audit efficiencies occur in audits in industries whose members have similar operations and, therefore, are where auditors benefit from the use of similar audit procedures and experience lower average audit costs. To identify industries with similar operations, we use operational expense homogeneity, which is based on the correlations between the changes in operating expenses among industry members. Adapting a standard fee model (Hay, Knechel, and Wong 2006), we find that homogeneity is negatively associated with audit fees. Further, we find that specialist auditors charge lower fees in homogenous industries. Finally, we observe a lower standard deviation of fees in more homogenous industries. Together, these results suggest that auditors sustain lower costs in audits of homogenous clients and that the similarly lower costs incurred across auditors are passed on to clients in the form of lower fees.

View more

Which Industry Classification Method Produces More Homogeneous Groups Of Firms?

Homogeneous Groups Of Firms? Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal

Cairney, Timothy D., Leslie Fletcher

2009

This study compares the homogeneity of industry members when classified under the Standard Industry Classification System (SICS) and when classified under the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). Homogeneity is measures as (1) correlations of operating expense changes and of revenue changes, and (2) variability of inventory, debt, and depreciation policies among member firms. Firms are identified as from SIC-defined industries and from NAICS-defined industries and the sets of industry members are compared. The conclusion from the tests is that NAICS industries are more homogeneous than SICS industries.

View more

Show All +