Timothy Meyer is an expert in public international law, with specialties in international trade and investment law and international energy governance. His current research examines how international economic agreements relate and respond to concerns about economic opportunity and inequality, as well as the role of the constitutional separation of powers in U.S. international economic policymaking. His past research has examined the interaction of international and local rules on energy subsidies, the role of local governments in free trade agreements, and the creation of non-binding "soft law" obligations. Meyer's work has appeared in the Columbia Law Review, the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, the California Law Review, the Vanderbilt Law Review, the Journal of Legal Analysis, and the European Journal of International Law, among others. He is also the author of a book on international soft law (with Andrew Guzman), forthcoming from Oxford University Press. Meyer has testified before the U.S. Senate Committees on Foreign Relations and the Judiciary and has served both as counsel and as an expert in cases raising international law issues in U.S. courts.
Before joining Vanderbilt’s law faculty in 2015, Meyer taught for five years at the University of Georgia School of Law. He entered the legal academy after practicing law for several years at the U.S. Department of State’s Office of the Legal Adviser where he represented the United States in commercial arbitration and real property transactions all over the world and in negotiations with foreign governments on diplomatic law issues. Before joining the State Department, Meyer was a law clerk for Justice Neil M. Gorsuch when he sat on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
Meyer earned his B.A. and M.A. in history from Stanford University, where he graduated Phi Beta Kappa, and his J.D. and Ph.D. in Jurisprudence and Social Policy from the University of California, Berkeley. At Berkeley, he held a Public Policy and Nuclear Threats Fellowship from the University of California Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation.
Areas of Expertise (10)
Trans Pacific Partnership
International Trade Agreements
International Energy Governance
International Investment Law
International Trade Law
International Enviromental Law
University of California, Berkley School of Law: Ph.D. (2008) and J.D. (2007), Law
Stanford University: M.A., History 2003
Stanford University: B.A., History 2003
- American Law Institute
- American Society of International Law
- American Law and Economics Association
- Society of International Economic Law
Selected Media Appearances (6)
From olive growers to winemakers, small firms in Europe are bracing for $7.5 billion in US tariffs
“The idea in choosing a list of products on which to retaliate is to pick products that will create political pressure on the other government to change its conduct,” says Timothy Meyer, a law professor and director of the international legal studies program at Vanderbilt University in Tennessee.
“In this case, the United States is targeting products that it expects will create political pressure in Europe to change the EU policies that the WTO has found unlawful.”
Explainer: What tools could Trump use to get U.S. firms to quit China?
For example, by stating that Chinese theft of U.S. companies’ intellectual property constitutes a national emergency, Trump could order U.S. companies to avoid certain transactions, such as buying Chinese technology products, said Tim Meyer, director of the International Legal Studies Program at Vanderbilt Law School in Nashville.
After backlash, Giuliani cancels Ukraine trip meant to ‘meddle’ in investigations to help Trump
The Washington Post print
“This is the first instance of which I am aware in which a private lawyer for the president of the United States has, in his own words, ‘meddled’ in a foreign criminal investigation of a third party in order to politically benefit the president,” said Tim Meyer, an international law expert at Vanderbilt University. “Mr. Giuliani’s actions undermine the long-standing U.S. foreign policy of promoting the rule of law in Ukraine generally and in the Ukrainian general prosecutor’s office specifically.”
Tentative deal to replace NAFTA puts pressure on Canada in win for Trump
The Conversation online
President Donald Trump on Aug. 27 announced an agreement that he said would replace NAFTA, an almost 25-year-old deal that allows most goods produced in North America to move duty-free across the continent.
As an expert on international economic law, I believe there are two key takeaways from this deal.
Wary of being tainted, some world leaders may not want to negotiate with Trump on trade
Non-US governments, and particularly democracies, “are under enormous pressure not to be seen to be caving to the Trump administration,” because of his unpopularity overseas, said Timothy Meyer, an international trade specialist and law professor at Vanderbilt University.
Trump’s threat to withdraw from NAFTA may hit a hurdle: The US Constitution
The Conversation online
On Aug. 16, representatives of the U.S., Canada and Mexico formally began renegotiating the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), an accord that has governed matters of trade and security on the continent for 23 years.
Whether you agree with him or not, his threat to unilaterally back out of NAFTA and other trade deals on his hit list may be a hollow one for a simple reason: the U.S. Constitution.
Selected Articles (3)
"American ambivalence toward international institutions is nothing new. In his farewell address, George Washington famously warned against foreign entanglements."
"In this essay, prepared for a symposium on International Trade in the Trump Era, I argue that one reason for President Trump's massive deployment of tariff authority is that the president, like any political officeholder, is beholden to those who put him in office—and who can keep him there."
"Since 1962, when Congress passed the Trade Expansion Act, every new US trade deal has had the same essential bargain at its core. Congress agrees to give the president the power to lower trade barriers in exchange for adjustment assistance for those workers displaced by competition with new imports."