Vicki J. Magley, Ph.D.

Professor of Psychology University of Connecticut

  • Storrs CT

Professor Magley researches sexual harassment coping at individual and organizational levels

Contact

University of Connecticut

View more experts managed by University of Connecticut

Areas of Expertise

Sexual Harassment
Sexual Harassment Prevention
Workplace Civility
Occupational Health, Gender and Stress
Sexual Harassment Coping at Individual and Organizational Levels

Education

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

A.M., Ph.D.

Psychology

1999

Purdue University

B.A.

Psychology

1991

Affiliations

  • Society for Occupational Health Psychology : Past President

Social

Media Appearances

Working to end gender harassment in medicine

AAMC News  online

2019-06-21

Leaders need to “be the eyes and ears of the institution,” noted Vicki J. Magley, PhD, University of Connecticut psychology professor and NASEM report co-author. “Having a common language when we talk about sexual harassment is very important, especially when talking about gender harassment.” She pointed to the telling statistic that only 20% of women recognize examples of gender harassment as harassment.

View More

We Asked 615 Men About How They Conduct Themselves at Work

New York Times  

2017-12-28

In short, organizations play a big role in curbing or permitting harassment, said Vicki Magley, a professor of psychology at the University of Connecticut. “Research finds that sexual harassment occurs when it is tolerated — that is, when policies are not enforced and when incidents are not taken seriously,” she said.

View More

Members of Congress Now Have to Do Sexual-harassment Training — Here's What Would Actually Make It Effective

Business Insider  

2017-11-18

Professor Vicki Magley is one of the few psychologists who’s researched sexual-harassment trainings in the workplace. She told Business Insider that it’s hard to quantify whether such education efforts are effective, since the effects are so poorly studied.

One reason for this, Magley said, is that companies are often too afraid to study their own trainings to find out if they work. After being asked to evaluate a company's sexual harassment training program, Magley said, she has often had the project canceled before completion. It's a catch-22: companies don't know what works because they're too scared to find out...

View More

Show All +

Courses

Undergraduate Courses

- PSYC 2600: Industrial/Organizational Psychology
- PSYC 3102: Psychology of Women

Graduate Courses

- PSYC 5670: Seminar in I/O Psychology: Multivariate Research Methodology
- PSYC 5670: Seminar in I/O Psychology: Organizational Stress
- PSYC 5123: Occupational Health Psychology

Articles

A practical scale for multi-faceted organizational health climate assessment

Journal of Occupational Health Psychology

Zweber, Z.M., Henning, R.A., & Magley, V.J

2016

The current study sought to develop a practical scale to measure 3 facets of workplace health climate from the employee perspective as an important component of a healthy organization. The goal was to create a short, usable yet comprehensive scale that organizations and occupational health professionals could use to determine if workplace health interventions were needed. The proposed Multi-faceted Organizational Health Climate Assessment (MOHCA) scale assesses facets that correspond to 3 organizational levels: (a) workgroup, (b) supervisor, and (c) organization. Ten items were developed and tested on 2 distinct samples, 1 cross-organization and 1 within-organization. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses yielded a 9-item, hierarchical 3-factor structure. Tests confirmed MOHCA has convergent validity with related constructs, such as perceived organizational support and supervisor support, as well as discriminant validity with safety climate. Lastly, criterion-related validity was found between MOHCA and health-related outcomes. The multi-faceted nature of MOHCA provides a scale that has face validity and can be easily translated into practice, offering a means for diagnosing the shortcomings of an organization or workgroup's health climate to better plan health and well-being interventions.

View more

Mere overrepresentation? Using cross-occupational injury and job analysis data to explain men’s risk for workplace fatalities.

Safety Science

Bauerle, T.J., McGonagle, A.K., & Magley, V.J.

2016

Historically, male workers have comprised a large proportion of occupational fatalities in the US. A common explanation for this has been that men are overrepresented in more physically hazardous occupations. Yet another potential explanation is that prescribed gender roles and norms contribute to higher rates of male worker fatalities compared with female workers. The purpose of this study was to test the assumption of the overrepresentation explanation, first, by testing the degree to which overrepresentation adequately accounts for men and women’s differing fatality frequencies across various occupations, and second, by exploring gendered worker, occupation, and organizational attributes which may explain variance in the severity of men’s fatality disparity between occupational titles. We used data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Occupational Information Network (O∗NET). Results indicate that more than 25% of the total occupational fatalities in 2012 occurred outside of what would be expected for equivalent fatality ratios for men and women working in the same occupation. Further, gendered job and worker characteristics significantly predicted variance in men’s relative risk for workplace fatalities across occupations (these characteristics, combined with sex representation, explained 10% of the total variance in men’s relative fatality risk). The results suggest that men may be at increased risk for occupational fatalities when compared to women in the same occupations, and advocate for investigating the role of gender for future research on injury and fatality discrepancies between male and female workers.

View more

An eye for an eye? Exploring the relationship between workplace incivility experiences and perpetration

Journal of Occupational Health Psychology

Gallus, J.A., Matthews, R.A., Bunk, J.A., Barnes-Farrell, J.L., & Magley, V.J.

2014

We examined the effects of gender and organizational climate for incivility on the relationship between individuals' incivility experiences and perpetration. Based on Andersson and Pearson's (1999) concept of the incivility spiral, Naylor, Pritchard, and Ilgen's (1980) theory of behavior in organizations, and social interactionist theory (Felson & Tedeschi, 1993), we proposed an interaction between incivility experiences, organizational climate for incivility (organizational tolerance and policies), and gender in predicting incivility perpetration. Results indicate that incivility experiences predict incivility perpetration and that men are more likely to be uncivil to others when their organization tolerates rudeness. Women's incivility experiences were associated with increased incivility perpetration, but were unaffected by incivility climate. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

View more

Show All +