Professor Zachary Price began teaching at UC Hastings as a Visiting Assistant Professor in 2013, following a one-year fellowship at the Stanford Law School Constitutional Law Center. He has been an Associate Professor at UC Hastings since 2015.
Before entering academics, Professor Price served for three years as an attorney in the Office of Legal Counsel, a component of the U.S. Department of Justice in Washington, D.C. that provides authoritative legal advice to the President, Attorney General, and executive branch agencies. He has also worked as a litigator in private practice and clerked at all three levels of the federal judiciary, for Judge Catherine C. Blake of the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, Judge David S. Tatel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, and Justice Anthony M. Kennedy of the U.S. Supreme Court. He graduated from Harvard Law School magna cum laude in 2003 and from Stanford University with honors and distinction in 1998.
Professor Price’s research focuses on questions of constitutional structure. His interests include constitutional law, civil procedure, statutory interpretation, and federal Indian law. His work has appeared in the Vanderbilt Law Review, Columbia Law Review, New York University Law Review Online, and Fordham Law Review.
Areas of Expertise (5)
Federal Indian Law
Harvard Law School: J.D. (Magna Cum Laude), Law 2003
Stanford University: With Honors and Distinction, Humanities 1998
Media Appearances (5)
After Scalia: The Rule of Lenity
Blogpost by Professor Price addressing impact of Justice Scalia's departure on the rule of lenity.
Taking Care of the Take Care Clause
National Law Journal, Supreme Court Brief online
Interview with Professor Price.
Dividing Sovereignty: Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. Sanchez Valle
Blogpost by Professor Price addressing then-pending Supreme Court case.
President or king? Translated, that’s what the Supreme Court is asking about Obama.
Washington Post online
Quoting Professor Price.
George Will: Obama's Extreme Use of Executive Discretion
Washington Post print
Discussing Professor Price's work.
Selected Articles (9)
Addresses whether and to what degree Congress may control executive authorities through appropriations.
Addresses the historical origins and potential vulnerability of the United States's distinctive approach to protecting expressive freedom.
Addresses possible due process protections for reliance on executive nonenforcement policies.
Discusses constitutional and rule-of-law debates over negative exercises of executive authority.
Addresses judicial authority to review exercises of executive enforcement discretion.
Addresses the scope of executive authority to decline enforcement of federal laws.
Proposes a framework for analyzing recurrent jurisdictional questions in criminal prosecutions by territorial governments and Native American tribes.
Challenges the doctrine of state equal sovereignty recently embraced by the Supreme Court.
Argues for the reinvigoration of the rule of lenity, the historic canon of construction that penal laws should be construed in the defendant's favor.