Daxton “Chip” Stewart profile photo

Daxton “Chip” Stewart

Professor and Assistant Provost for Research Compliance

  • Fort Worth TX UNITED STATES

Dr. Stewart’s areas of expertise include media law and communication technology.

Contact

Media

Biography

Daxton “Chip” Stewart’s areas of expertise include media law and communication technology, the First Amendment, freedom of information and public records laws, social media and sports journalism.

Dr. Stewart began his career as a sportswriter before becoming an attorney. He has served as the editor-in-chief of Dispute Resolution Magazine, a city editor and columnist at the Columbia Missourian, and practiced law in Texas. He was co-founding editor of Community Journalism, the online, peer-reviewed official journal of AEJMC’s Community Journalism Interest Group, where he now serves on the editorial board. He is also on the editorial boards of Journal of Media Law & Ethics and International Communication Research Journal.

Areas of Expertise

Media Law
Communication Technology
First Amendment
Freedom of Information
Public Records Law
Social Media
Sports Journalism

Accomplishments

Top Paper in the AEJMC Law & Policy Division

2024

Second Place Paper, National Freedom of Information Coalition FOI Research Competition

2023 & 2022

Top Paper, National Freedom of Information Coalition Research Paper Competition

2019 & 2021

Education

University of Missouri-Columbia

Ph.D.

Journalism

2009

University of Missouri-Columbia School of Law

LL.M.

Alternative Dispute Resolution

2007

University of Missouri-Columbia

M.A.

Journalism

2004

Affiliations

  • AEJMC : Law and Policy Division
  • Communication Law & Policy : Associate Editor
  • Texas Center for Community Journalism
  • Kappa Tau Alpha : Faculty Advisor
  • American Association of University Professors

Media Appearances

Bexar County's notorious records requester wants to prove that he's a journalist

Fort Worth Star-Telegram  online

2026-04-03

Chip Stewart, a media law attorney and professor at Texas Christian University, said Brantley's argument likely hinges on whether he meets Texas law's definition of a journalist - including whether he earns a substantial portion of his income from the work.

View More

Can Gov. Abbott really cut school funding over ICE walkouts? What the law says

Fort Worth Star-Telegram  online

2026-02-18

Chip Stewart, a First Amendment expert and media law professor at TCU who has a child in Fort Worth ISD and shared the district’s guidance with the Star-Telegram, said the message was clear.

View More

5 transparency experts say Texas AG Ken Paxton's suit over DA Garza security has merit

Austin American-Statesman  online

2024-10-09

"It would be even better if Paxton and his office would enforce the laws in an even-handed manner against political friends and foes alike, so the public could have easier access to participating in our democratic process.”

— Daxton “Chip” Stewart, attorney and professor in the Bob Schieffer School of Communications at Texas Christian University

View More

Event Appearances

Too Many Cases, Too Little Support: How the debate over what instructors teach in Media Law courses is a symptom of institutional changes in mass communication education

August 2023 | Annual Conference of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication  Washington, DC

Opening the Floodgates: Assessing and Implementing Affirmative Disclosure

October 2023 | 2023 National Freedom of Information Coalition Summit  Louisville, KY

The State of the First Amendment Professor: Joys, Challenges and How to Get By With Help From Your Colleagues

March 2024 | 2024 AEJMC Southeast Colloquium  Lexington, KY

Research Grants

Adviser Grant

Kappa Tau Alpha

2024

Free Inquiry Grant

Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression

2024

Articles

Secrecy Inc.: How Governments Use Trade Secrets, Purported Competitive Harm and Third-Party Interventions to Privatize Public Records

Journal of Civic Information

2019

As governments engage in public-private partnerships, they have devised ways to shield the public’s business from the traditional level scrutiny offered by citizens and journalists, watchdogs of the public trust. The authors propose rethinking public oversight of private vendors doing government business. First, the authors explore the historical and legal background of open records laws. This core purpose is undermined by overly broad interpretations of trade secrets and competitive harm exceptions, a trend exacerbated by the U.S. Supreme Court in a 2019 ruling. The authors demonstrate why public-private collusion to sabotage transparency demands a reinvigorated approach to the quasi-government body doctrine, which has been sharply limited for decades. The authors conclude with recommendations on reversing the trend.

View more

Ghosted by Government: Why Government Entities Should be Required to Respond to Public Records Requests

Journal of Civic Information

2021

Public records laws across the United States operate under the presumption that citizens should have access to government records, but obtaining this information is not always a simple undertaking. Although state public records laws vary, only a few establish a requirement that government entities acknowledge the existence of a request. And while some state laws mandate a time limit within which entities are supposed to produce records or issue a denial, those limits vary considerably from the specific three business days to the vague requirement of promptness. We analyzed these requirements in the 50 states and recommend policy changes that would hold government entities accountable to requestors and create a more level playing field for citizens seeking public records that should presumptively be open.

View more

Freedom of speech and press in Muslim-majority countries

International Journal of Communication

2021

This article examines the constitutions of 47 Muslim-majority countries and the Palestinian territories to compare the inclusion of free speech and free press guarantees, as well as the presence of Islam as the official state religion, to the actual existence of these freedoms in these countries, using a scale based on rankings developed by Reporters Without Borders and Freedom House. First, the findings suggest that the inclusion of Islam as a state religion in a country’s constitution does not necessarily lead to exclusion of freedom of speech and press in the constitutions of Muslim-majority countries. Second, inclusion of Islam as a state religion in the constitutions does make a significant difference when it comes to actual freedom in Muslim-majority countries, based on the ranking scale developed by the authors.

View more