Ralph Carter profile photo

Ralph Carter

Piper Professor, Political Science

  • Fort Worth TX UNITED STATES

Professor Carter focuses on Middle East conflicts, U.S. foreign trade and defense policy, with an emphasis on the roles played by Congress.

Contact

Spotlight

2 min

As the war against Iran continues to unfold, global media coverage has intensified, with major news organizations providing near-constant reporting on the conflict and its geopolitical implications. From live battlefield updates to analysis of regional alliances, energy markets, and international diplomacy, the story has become one of the most closely followed developments in international affairs. Networks such as CBS News are dedicating significant airtime to helping audiences understand the rapidly evolving situation and the broader implications for global stability. To provide credible context and insight, these outlets often turn to academic experts who specialize in Middle East politics and international relations. Experts like Ralph Carter from Texas Christian University (TCU) are among those providing research-based analysis that helps explain the historical roots of the conflict, the motivations of the key actors involved, and what developments could come next. Their expertise allows journalists to translate complex geopolitical dynamics into clear, accurate information for audiences trying to make sense of a fast-moving global crisis. Professor Ralph Carter teaches introductory courses in political science and international politics as well as advanced courses in Middle East conflicts, U.S. foreign policy and Russian foreign policy. He is the author or editor of eight books and the author or co-author of over 50 journal articles, book chapters, and other professional publications. His research agenda focuses on the making of U.S. foreign, trade, and defense policy, with a particular emphasis on the roles played by members of Congress. Recently, Professor Carter's expertise was sought out by CBS News in Dallas/Fort Worth as journalists were updating Americans on the current situation in the war in Iran. Ralph Carter is available to speak with the media about the ongoing war in Iran simply click on his icon now to arrange an interview today.

Ralph Carter

3 min

The 2024 Summer Olympics in France are a celebratory time for many – including a record nine Horned Frogs competing – but the Games are against the backdrop of dynamic circumstances throughout the globe. TCU News spoke to Ralph Carter, Piper Professor of political science, about viewing the Olympics through the lens of current affairs. Q: Between the Russia/Ukraine conflict, the Israel/Palestine conflict and more, the Olympics are occurring during a tumultuous time in our world. Would you share your observations on that as a political scientist?  The Olympics always take place against a backdrop of international politics. They often generate a surge in nationalism on the part of participating countries. There could be demonstrations for or against certain countries or their athletes that get the attention of the media, but the conflicts currently underway in the world will be largely unaffected.  Q: This is not new. Do any other Games stick out in your mind that occurred during disruption?  The 1980 Olympics were held in Moscow less than a year after the Soviet Union’s invasion of Afghanistan. As a result, many countries boycotted participating in those games, including the United States. Ultimately, 67 countries chose not to participate in 1980. In retaliation, the Soviet Union boycotted the 1984 Olympics held in Los Angeles along with a handful of pro-Soviet or anti-US countries. Nonetheless, 140 countries participated in 1984, making it the largest number of participating countries up to that point. Q: Do you feel the Olympic Games happening during times like these helps or hurts? Do you feel it brings a respite or instead makes things more uncomfortable?  It magnifies both the good and bad emotions that arise with heightened nationalism. However, this is usually short-lived, and relationships return to their prior state pretty quickly. Q: For years the Olympics have looked past differences in governments, societies, politics, even human rights. From a historical and political standpoint, what do you think the impact of the Games has been?  The Olympics are a mirror of current realities in international politics. The fact that in 1936 four Olympic gold medals were won in Berlin by a Black American – Jesse Owens – did not change Adolf Hitler’s racism. The 1980 boycott of the Moscow games did not result in a Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan. In short, the Olympics have minimal impact on global politics, if that.   Q: Anything else you would like to add?  In the past, many countries have gone on spending sprees to host an Olympics, building arenas and sporting facilities, “Olympic villages” of apartments, etc. Many of those countries have failed to recoup any meaningful return on their investments. Oftentimes, those facilities fall into disrepair and lead one to wonder how those financial resources could be better invested for the people of that country. Only a limited number of countries have the in-place sporting facilities and hospitality infrastructure to host such events. It’s long past time, in my opinion, for there to be some changes in the decision-making process regarding host countries. Ralph Carter is available to speak with media about the upcoming Olympic Games simply click on his icon now to arrange an interview today.

Ralph Carter

2 min

As the eleven-day war between Palestine and Israel sits on a razor-thin ceasefire, it is hoped that American intervention and influence can deliver support, aid and even a lasting truce between two warring factions. For diplomats, it will be like walking a tight rope in an effort to calm both the Israelis and Palestinians while also ensuring Hamas remains on the sidelines. U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken is in the region now, leading the cause. The truce that came into effect Friday has so far held, but it did not address any of the underlying issues in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, something Blinken acknowledged after meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. “We know that to prevent a return to violence, we have to use the space created to address a larger set of underlying issues and challenges. And that begins with tackling the grave humanitarian situation in Gaza and starting to rebuild,” he said. “The United States will work to rally international support around that effort while also making our own significant contributions.” He added that the U.S. would work with its partners “to ensure that Hamas does not benefit from the reconstruction assistance.” Blinken will not be meeting with Hamas, which does not recognize Israel’s right to exist and which Israel and the U.S. consider a terrorist organization. May 25 Associated Press This will be a long and delicate process and there are a lot of questions to consider: Is it possible to negotiate in Gaza and not include Hamas? With Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu both facing a political ousting can a solution even be found? And what are the issues and is there any negotiating the long-sought after two-state solution? If you’re a journalist looking to cover the ongoing tensions between Israel and Palestine – then let us help with your stories and questions. Professor Ralph Carter is an expert in the areas of international politics, U.S. foreign policy, and Mideast conflicts. Dr. Carter is available to speak with media regarding the ongoing developments between Israel and Palestine – simply click on his icon now to arrange an interview today.

Ralph Carter

Media

Social

Biography

Professor Carter teaches introductory courses in political science and international politics as well as advanced courses in Middle East conflicts, U.S. foreign policy and Russian foreign policy.

He is the author or editor of "Making US Foreign Policy: The Essentials" (2nd ed., 2020); "Contemporary Cases in U.S. Foreign Policy: From National Security to Human Security" (6th ed., 2021); "IR: Seeking Security, Prosperity, and Quality of Life in a Changing World," with James M. Scott and A. Cooper Drury (4th ed. 2022); the 44-essay Foreign Policy Analysis component of the International Studies Encyclopedia, with Steven B. Redd, Valerie M. Hudson, Patrick James, and Jeffrey Pickering (2010); "Choosing to Lead: Understanding Congressional Foreign Policy Entrepreneurs," with James M. Scott (2009), and "Making American Foreign Policy, with John T. Rourke and Mark A. Boyer" (2nd ed. 1996). He is the author or co-author of over 50 journal articles, book chapters, and other professional publications.

From 2004-2009, he served as one of the inaugural editors of the journal Foreign Policy Analysis and previously served on the editorial boards of both Foreign Policy Analysis and International Studies Perspectives. His research agenda focuses on the making of U.S. foreign, trade, and defense policy, with a particular emphasis on the roles played by members of Congress.

In 2014, Professor Carter received the TCU Chancellor’s Award for Distinguished Achievement as a Creative Teacher and Scholar and was selected as one of 10 Piper Professors of Texas. In its 2012 inaugural edition, Princeton Review named Professor Carter one of The Best 300 Professors in the United States. In 2006, he became the first person from a non-doctoral program to receive the International Studies Association’s Quincy Wright Distinguished Scholar Award. He received TCU’s Deans’ Teaching Award in 2007 and was named one of five ‘Best Professors’ at TCU by the Texas Monthly 2004 Guide to Texas Colleges and Universities.

Areas of Expertise

Middle East
Russia
International Relations
War & Conflict
Foreign Policy
Foreign Policy Analysis
U. S. Foreign Policy in Film
North Korea
Promotion of U. S. Democracy

Accomplishments

Quincy Wright Distinguished Scholar Award

2006-11-11

Award for distinguished scholarship and service to the International Studies Association, awarded by its Midwest Region. Dr. Carter was the first recipient of this award to come from an undergraduate-only political science department.

The Best 300 Professors

2012-04-15

Named one of the best 300 professors in the United States, across all fields and academic disciplines, by Princeton Review

TCU Chancellor's Award for Distinguished Achievement as a Creative Teacher and Scholar

2014-10-16

Named top professor for both teaching and research at TCU

Education

The Ohio State University

Ph.D.

Political Science

1980

The Ohio State University

M.A.

Political Science

1977

Midwestern State University

B.A.

Political Science

1974

Affiliations

  • International Studies Association
  • American Political Science Association

Media Appearances

Expert on Middle East relations after retaliatory fire from Iran begins against U.S., Israel

CBS News Texas  tv

2026-03-01

TCU political science professor Ralph Carter said he believes there won’t be a quick resolution to this new war. “Iran is going to attack targets in the United States if it has the capability to do so through terrorist attacks, through assassinations, cyber attack in the like.”

View More

The Greenland connection: Fort Worth emerges as linchpin in U.S. policy push for critical minerals

Fort Worth Report  online

2026-01-24

What does the recent U.S. interest in Greenland have to do with a Fort Worth factory manufacturing magnets?

Under the first Trump administration, Congress passed a little-noticed critical minerals legislation to increase the country’s supplies. Another event brought the issue back to the front burner, said Ralph Carter, a political science professor at Texas Christian University.

View More

Expert shares insight on Israel Iran conflict

FOX 4 News  tv

2025-06-23

Ralph Carter is a professor of political science at Texas Christian University with a focus on international relations and Middle East foreign policy. He talked to FOX 4's Shaun Rabb about the Iranian missiles that were fired at a U.S. military base in Qatar, as well as the ongoing conflict between Israel and Iran.

View More

Articles

Managing the Money: The President, Congress, and US Democracy Aid, FY2013-FY2019.

MidSouth Political Science Review 22, 97-134.

James M. Scott, Ralph G. Carter

2022

Democratizing Dictators? Non-Democratic Regime Conditions and the Allocation of US Democracy Assistance, 1975-2010.

International Political Science Review, 41 (3), 436-450

James M. Scott, Ralph G. Carter

2020

As the USA initiated strategies of democracy promotion to support the spread of democracy, a key element involved democracy assistance. However, some states receive substantial commitments of US democracy aid while other states receive little or none, and the mix of democracy assistance varies in allocation between civil society and institutional channels. This study examines democracy aid allocation, focusing on the role of regime conditions on the targeting and composition of the aid. We disaggregate regime type to differentiate among non-democratic governments and argue that such differences affect both the amount of democracy aid and whether aid packages target government institutions or civil society channels. We theorize how these regime conditions shape allocations, controlling for donor interests and recipient features, and test our argument against US democracy aid allocations by the US Agency for International Development (USAID) from 1975 to 2010. We conclude with discussion of the implications of these findings.

View more

Distributing Dollars for Democracy: Changing Foreign Policy Contexts and the Shifting Determinants of US Democracy Aid, 1975-2010.

Journal of International Relations and Development, 22, 640-675

James M. Scott, Ralph G. Carter

2019

In the late 20th century, the United States adapted to changes in the international arena and initiated innovative strategies of democracy promotion by providing assistance to governments, political parties, and non-governmental organisations all over the world. Through the lens of foreign policy change, this analysis examines the factors shaping US democracy aid decisions in the context of two major paradigm shifts—the end of the Cold War (1989) and the 9/11 episode (2001)—which establish three distinct US foreign policy contexts: Cold War, post-Cold War, and Global War on Terror. Examining democracy aid allocations; ideational goals; US interests; and economic, political and social factors, we argue that the external foreign policy context of each time period generates a different blend of determinants that shape democracy aid allocations, with ideational factors more consequential in the post-Cold War and Global War on Terror contexts, and interest-based factors more significant in the Cold War and Global War on Terror contexts. Evidence from the period between 1975 and 2010 provides support for our argument. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of these findings.

View more