Jennifer Necci Dineen, Ph.D. profile photo

Jennifer Necci Dineen, Ph.D.

Associate Professor In-Residence, School of Public Policy | Associate Director, UConn Center for Advancing, Research, Methods, and Scholarship in Gun Injury Prevention (ARMS)

  • Hartford CT UNITED STATES

Jennifer Dineen is a survey methodologist who focuses on stakeholder attitudes as mechanism for intervention uptake and policy change.

Contact

Spotlight

4 min

Earlier this week, UConn's Jennifer Dineen co-authored an opinion piece in Vital City where she shared a very candid expert perspective on gun violence and how too often it is only portrayed or explained from the point of view and experience of a male observer. She shares how topics like intimate partner violence, a lack of data on gun ownership by women, and the risks that pregnant women face are at best overlooked and too often simply ignored. Jennifer Dineen is a survey methodologist who focuses on stakeholder attitudes as mechanism for intervention uptake and policy change. She is an associate professor in-residence on fellowship in the Institute for Collaboration on Health, Intervention, and Policy (InCHIP) at the University of Connecticut and associate director of UConn’s Center for Advancing Research, Methods, and Scholarship (ARMS) in Gun Violence Prevention. View her profile Men are more likely victims and perpetrators of firearm injury, and men are most likely firearm owners. And so we often consider gun violence a mostly male problem. Mostly, but not only — and the way guns shape women’s lives often falls away from the conversation altogether. This issue of Vital City attempts to serve as a corrective. We ask readers to consider the unique impact and ways that women interact with or are harmed by firearms and to then consider solutions. Though American women’s firearm injury and death rates are lower than American men’s, they are much higher than women’s in other countries. And women are increasingly owners of guns, at rates that would’ve been highly surprising a generation ago. When we start to see guns through women’s eyes, the policy conversation changes. It changes the strategy considerations for preventing violence and for educating gun owners. The articles in this issue try to explain what we know about women and firearms and the knowledge gaps that still hinder our understanding. Our goal is to spark future research and data collection and to highlight what policymakers can do now as well as ultimately, finding well-tailored interventions that reduce adverse outcomes (like fear, injury and death) and promote positive outcomes (like safer firearm ownership, health and well-being). Women’s relationship with firearms is distinct from men’s Let’s begin with how women are harmed by weapons. If the classic picture of a male homicide or injury victim is a young man, shot by a stranger, what’s a female gun homicide or injury victim? Far too often, it’s someone targeted by her intimate partner. And, far too often, it’s someone pregnant. In a surprising number of cases, victims are older women. Which is not to say that women don’t get involved in street violence, both on the receiving and the giving end; they do. How women are harmed by guns Women most commonly are injured or killed by guns used by an intimate partner in the context of domestic violence. The presence of a firearm in an abusive household increases the risk of intimate partner homicide fivefold. While homicide is the worst outcome, firearms may also be used in an abusive relationship to exert coercive control; thus their presence changes the threat calculus even when never fired. Further, when women are harmed, it’s often in their own homes, which, as Erdal Tekin and Michael Ulrich detail in their articles, has implications for the interpretation of legal doctrine — a doctrine built on threats outside of the home. Homicide — primarily by firearm — leads to more maternal death (defined as the death of those who are pregnant or have recently given birth) in the U.S. than hemorrhage, hypertension and infection. Stated differently, expectant and new mothers are in greater danger from bullets than biology. Lynn Addington points out that, while there is an age gradient, women over the age of 50 are still at risk of intimate partner homicide (which may also involve the shooter dying by suicide). Finally, women may suffer from firearms due to their caregiver roles. Nelba Márquez-Greene and Zirui Song document that when children and other family members are shot, it is disproportionately women — mothers, sisters, daughters — who absorb the psychological and economic fallout. The full piece is attached above and is a must-read article for anyone interested in this important topic. And, if you're a journalist looking to know more about violence prevention, gun violence, and how it impacts women in America, then we can help. Jennifer Dineen is available to speak with media about this topic, simply click on her profile now to arrange an interview today.

Jennifer Necci Dineen, Ph.D.

Biography

Jennifer Necci Dineen is currently an associate professor in-residence on fellowship in the Institute for Collaboration on Health, Intervention, and Policy (InCHIP) at the University of Connecticut. She is associate director of UConn’s Center for Advancing Research, Methods, and Scholarship (ARMS) in Gun Violence Prevention. Dineen is a survey methodologist whose research focuses on stakeholder attitudes as mechanism for intervention uptake and policy change. She also has expertise in understanding how stakeholders interact with political institutions in the policy process. Dineen works on interdisciplinary research teams in the areas of gun violence prevention and school-based mental and behavioral health policy and practice.

Areas of Expertise

Gun Violence Prevention
Gun Injury Prevention
Education Policy
Political Attitudes and Behavior
Qualitative Research Methods
Survey Methodology
Public Policy

Education

University of Connecticut

Ph.D.

Political Science (American Politics, Survey Methods)

2001

University of Connecticut

M.A.

Political Science (Survey Methods)

1994

Marist College

B.A.

Political Science

1993

Social

Media

Media Appearances

A controversial handgun crackdown is coming in California

USA Today  online

2025-10-15

The move in California comes as a number of Democratic-led states are looking for their own solutions to the problem of illegal machine gun conversion devices, turning to lawsuits and pondering their own anti-Glock measures in the absence of the company taking steps to thwart the switch devices, said Jennifer Dineen, a professor at the University of Connecticut and member of the Rockefeller Institute of Government’s Regional Gun Violence Research Consortium.

"California is the first to be successful here," Dineen said. "It's a state taking action when a manufacturer does not take action."

View More

Illinois Considers Unusual Approach to Gun Regulations

Governing  online

2025-09-29

The bill “really is the first of its kind,” says Jennifer Dineen, associate director of University of Connecticut’s Center for Advancing Research, Methods, and Scholarship (ARMS) in Gun Violence Prevention, and member of the Regional Gun Violence Research Consortium.

If the law passes, manufacturers would be unable to operate in Illinois without obtaining the to-be-created state license, and retailers could only sell Illinois consumers guns from licensed manufacturers. This would be enforced with hefty fines for violations — manufacturers could face up to $1 million in fines per month.

View More

Should gun makers and dealers be held responsible for crimes? CT bill would make it so

Hartford Courant  print

2025-03-14

Dr. Jennifer Dineen, associate director of UConn’s ARMS Center for Gun Injury Prevention, testified in favor, calling HB 7042 “a crucial step in incentivizing responsible control over the use and transfer of firearms and related products.

“History has shown that industry liability is an effective tool for improving health and safety outcomes for products that, through negligence, accident, or misuse, can cause harm. Even when manufacturers do not voluntarily enhance safety measures, evidence demonstrates that litigation can drive improvements,” she said.

View More

Event Appearances

Expanding the Definition of Firearm Exposure to Include Lifetime Prevalence

Society to Advance Violence and Injury Reduction Annual Meeting  Denver, CO - 2023

Key Takeaways from a National Exploration of Social, Emotional, and Behavioral Screening Practices in U.S. Schools

44th Annual Conference of the International School Psychology Association  Bologna, Italy - 2023

Advancing a Transformativist Approach to Development of Social, Emotional, and Behavioral Screeners

44th Annual Conference of the International School Psychology Association  Bologna, Italy - 2023

Research Grants

Women and Firearms. A special issue for Vital City

Arnold Ventures

2025-2027

Harms and Benefits Inventory Wave

Arnold Ventures

2024-2025

Insurance as a Mechanism to Reduce Gun Violence Innovation Day

UConn ARMS

2024-2025

Articles

The Crisis We Fail to Name

Vital City

Kerri M. Raissian and Jennifer Dineen

2026-09-30

We invite you to imagine the problem of American firearm injury. What comes to mind? Which communities are the most affected? Who needs the most resources both to prevent and respond to American gun violence? Who owns America’s guns? Who is the most likely to be harmed?

If you’re familiar with firearm death in the United States, you may have had some of the following thoughts, and you wouldn’t have been wrong: The American firearm death rate (12.4 per 100,000 persons) is the highest of any developed country. About 35% of all gun deaths are homicides, 62% are suicides, and 3% are a mix of deaths from mass shootings, from unintentional discharge, involving law enforcement or from undetermined circumstances. And in most of these cases, the hand on the trigger or the individual in the sights of the gun is a man.

View more

Opinion: CT lawmakers, stop treating guns like a special case

CT Viewpoints

2025-04-04

Connecticut should adopt two critical bills. HB 7042 would end the extraordinary and dangerous level of legal protection firearms enjoy, and HB 7137 would ensure people who move to Connecticut from out of state are held to the same background standards as current Connecticut state residents.

Nationally and in Connecticut, the firearm industry is protected by the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), which shields manufacturers and dealers from liability, even when negligence results in injury or death. Firearms are also exempt from regulation by the Consumer Product Safety Commission, meaning no mandatory safety standards apply.

View more

Breaking the Silence: The Role of Screening in Physician-Initiated Firearm Safety Conversations

Health Education & Behavior

2025

This article expands and investigates what physicians perceive as facilitators and barriers to initiating preventive health education, also called anticipatory guidance or medical education, around secure firearm storage in the home (safe storage) and outside the home (Emergency Risk Protection Orders [ERPO]).

View more