Featured Post from Texas Christian University

Expert Q&A: Ralph Carter Speaks on the Politics of the Olympic Games

Jul 24, 2024

3 min

Ralph Carter


CaptionResizeWrap TextRemove


The 2024 Summer Olympics in France are a celebratory time for many – including a record nine Horned Frogs competing – but the Games are against the backdrop of dynamic circumstances throughout the globe. TCU News spoke to Ralph Carter, Piper Professor of political science, about viewing the Olympics through the lens of current affairs.


Q: Between the Russia/Ukraine conflict, the Israel/Palestine conflict and more, the Olympics are occurring during a tumultuous time in our world. Would you share your observations on that as a political scientist? 


The Olympics always take place against a backdrop of international politics. They often generate a surge in nationalism on the part of participating countries. There could be demonstrations for or against certain countries or their athletes that get the attention of the media, but the conflicts currently underway in the world will be largely unaffected. 


Q: This is not new. Do any other Games stick out in your mind that occurred during disruption? 


The 1980 Olympics were held in Moscow less than a year after the Soviet Union’s invasion of Afghanistan. As a result, many countries boycotted participating in those games, including the United States. Ultimately, 67 countries chose not to participate in 1980. In retaliation, the Soviet Union boycotted the 1984 Olympics held in Los Angeles along with a handful of pro-Soviet or anti-US countries. Nonetheless, 140 countries participated in 1984, making it the largest number of participating countries up to that point.


CaptionResizeWrap TextRemove


Q: Do you feel the Olympic Games happening during times like these helps or hurts? Do you feel it brings a respite or instead makes things more uncomfortable? 


It magnifies both the good and bad emotions that arise with heightened nationalism. However, this is usually short-lived, and relationships return to their prior state pretty quickly.


Q: For years the Olympics have looked past differences in governments, societies, politics, even human rights. From a historical and political standpoint, what do you think the impact of the Games has been? 


The Olympics are a mirror of current realities in international politics. The fact that in 1936 four Olympic gold medals were won in Berlin by a Black American – Jesse Owens – did not change Adolf Hitler’s racism. The 1980 boycott of the Moscow games did not result in a Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan. In short, the Olympics have minimal impact on global politics, if that.  


Q: Anything else you would like to add? 


In the past, many countries have gone on spending sprees to host an Olympics, building arenas and sporting facilities, “Olympic villages” of apartments, etc. Many of those countries have failed to recoup any meaningful return on their investments. Oftentimes, those facilities fall into disrepair and lead one to wonder how those financial resources could be better invested for the people of that country. Only a limited number of countries have the in-place sporting facilities and hospitality infrastructure to host such events. It’s long past time, in my opinion, for there to be some changes in the decision-making process regarding host countries.



Ralph Carter is available to speak with media about the upcoming Olympic Games - simply click on his icon now to arrange an interview today.

Connect with:
Ralph Carter

Ralph Carter

Piper Professor, Political Science

Professor Carter focuses on Middle East conflicts, U.S. foreign trade and defense policy, with an emphasis on the roles played by Congress.

Middle EastRussiaInternational RelationsWar & ConflictForeign Policy
Powered by

You might also like...

Check out some other posts from Texas Christian University

The Final Whistle: What Ronaldo’s World Cup Exit Reveals About Letting Go featured image

2 min

The Final Whistle: What Ronaldo’s World Cup Exit Reveals About Letting Go

While the fans watched the final moments of Cristiano Ronaldo’s World Cup career, they were also witnessing something much deeper than the end of a match. They were seeing the psychological transition that every athlete eventually faces. Elite athletes spend decades developing an identity centered around training, competing, and performing at the highest level. When that chapter comes to an end, the challenge is no longer physical — it becomes psychological. It isn’t about walking away from the sport. It’s about redefining who they are without the game that has shaped so much of their life, and answering the question: who am I without sport? From a sport psychology perspective, successful retirement is defined by how well an athlete adapts to life after sport. Research shows that retirement is healthier when it is done proactively. Ideally, the athlete begins to develop interests outside of sport, builds a strong support system, and recognizes that their value extends beyond athletic performance. The goal is not to replace the identity of the “athlete” but to expand it. The skills that made them successful — discipline, leadership, and resilience — become the foundation for the next chapter. Retirement from elite sport is a process, not a single moment. For someone like Ronaldo, what makes this transition especially unique is that it happened on the world’s biggest stage. Elite athletes transition as millions watch, analyze every reaction, and say goodbye alongside them. It’s completely normal for athletes to experience mixed emotions— pride, gratitude, sadness, uncertainty, and even relief — all at the same time, as they reflect on the reality of closing a chapter that has defined much of their life. The end of an athlete’s elite career isn’t just about leaving competition. It’s about navigating a new sense of identity, discovering purpose beyond sport, and embracing a legacy that has impacted the sport and inspired generations. If you're covering stories on athlete retirement, identity, or the psychology behind the 2026 World Cup, connect with Robyn Trocchio. CONNECT WITH THE EXPERT Robyn Trocchio, Ph.D., CMPC Associate Professor and Graduate Program Director | Harris College of Nursing & Health Sciences, Kinesiology View Full Profile. Areas of expertise: Sport, exercise, and performance psychology · enhancing human performance from a psychophysiological perspective · attention allocation and perception of effort during physical activity · applied sport psychology research

New Harvard Report Highlights the Need for Ethical Leaders and Responsible Citizens featured image

2 min

New Harvard Report Highlights the Need for Ethical Leaders and Responsible Citizens

A new report from Harvard University's Making Caring Common Project and the National Association for College Admission Counseling is calling for a renewed focus on character, purpose, civic engagement, and ethical leadership in the college admissions process. The report, Turning the Tide in 2026: Preparing Students for Lives of Caring and Purpose, argues that colleges can play a critical role in helping develop the moral and civic capacities needed to strengthen communities and democracy. Among the higher education leaders featured in the report is Heath Einstein, Vice Provost for Enrollment Management at Texas Christian University, whose comments reinforce TCU's longstanding commitment to preparing students for lives of purpose and service. "In near perfect alignment with this report's principles, TCU's raison d'être is to produce ethical leaders and responsible citizens in the global community. At a time when our society—perhaps intentionally fragmented—cannot even agree on facts, it is essential to teach young people how to think critically about the world around them, communicate across difference, and collaborate to solve humanity's most pressing issues." The report warns that increasing political polarization, declining trust, rising mental health challenges, and excessive achievement pressure are affecting young people across the United States. Its authors argue that colleges, schools, and families should place greater emphasis on helping students develop empathy, curiosity, humility, civic responsibility, and a sense of purpose. Einstein notes that these qualities are central to the student experience TCU seeks to cultivate. "In order to achieve this outcome, we seek to create a class of students who possess empathy and humility so that they can critique ideas without critiquing the people presenting the ideas." The report's recommendations include encouraging meaningful engagement over résumé-building, helping students identify what they value and find purposeful, and creating admissions processes that recognize ethical character alongside academic achievement. Looking to know more? We can help. Heath Einstein, Vice Provost for Enrollment Management at Texas Christian University, is available to discuss college admissions, student success, ethical leadership, civic engagement, student purpose, and the evolving role of higher education in preparing future leaders.

U.S.-Iran Agreement May Be Easier to Sign Than Sustain, Says TCU Political Scientist featured image

2 min

U.S.-Iran Agreement May Be Easier to Sign Than Sustain, Says TCU Political Scientist

As reports emerge of a potential memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the United States and Iran, questions remain about whether any agreement can overcome decades of mistrust, competing national interests, and domestic political pressures. Ralph Carter is the Piper Professor of Political Science at Texas Christian University (TCU). focuses on Middle East conflicts, U.S. foreign trade and defense policy, with an emphasis on the roles played by Congress. View his profile According to Texas Christian University political scientist Ralph Carter, the details of the agreement and whether both sides ultimately accept those terms, will determine whether negotiations can move forward. "We have to know what's in the MOU itself and whether both sides agree on that. If it's acceptable to both sides, then domestic politics on both sides enters the picture." For the United States, Carter notes that President Trump is eager to secure a diplomatic victory while also maintaining his long-standing position on Iran's nuclear ambitions. Carter says the administration faces competing pressures: demonstrating progress on national security, ensuring stability in global energy markets, and responding to economic concerns that matter most to American voters. At the same time, Iran is unlikely to compromise on what it views as fundamental issues of sovereignty and national independence. "Any Iranian regime, including this one, will insist on two things: Its territory is inviolate. It will not give it up. Its sovereignty is not negotiable." While Tehran may be willing to accept inspections or limits on highly enriched uranium, Carter says Iran is unlikely to abandon its nuclear program entirely simply to satisfy U.S. demands. Economic sanctions and their impact on Iran's economy will also remain central to any negotiations. The timeline may present another obstacle. "A 60-day window after the MOU is signed probably isn't enough time to reconcile these differences." As negotiations continue, Carter can provide expert analysis on U.S.-Iran relations, nuclear diplomacy, sanctions policy, Middle East security, international negotiations, and the domestic political considerations influencing both governments. Ralph Carter is available to discuss U.S.-Iran relations, nuclear negotiations, international diplomacy, sanctions policy, and Middle East politics.

View all posts
Powered by