J.S. Held Global Risk Report Unpacks AI Challenges and Digital Regulations Reshaping Business

The report explores AI risks, regulatory shifts, and strategies to balance innovation, compliance, and cybersecurity.

Feb 20, 2025

2 min

Simon Placks

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming industries, yet its rapid adoption brings new risks and regulatory scrutiny. The J.S. Held 2025 Global Risk Report provides expert perspective on AI-driven cyber threats, data governance challenges, and compliance requirements shaping the future of business.



As companies integrate AI to enhance efficiency, they must also navigate risks such as data poisoning, biased AI outputs, and legal exposure under the EU AI Act. The report highlights how businesses can safeguard their operations while leveraging AI’s potential for cybersecurity, fraud detection, and operational efficiency.


Key insights from the report include:


  • The growing use of AI by cybercriminals to launch sophisticated attacks
  • The environmental impact of AI’s energy-intensive data centers
  • How AI-specific insurance products are evolving to cover new risks
  • Compliance challenges posed by the EU AI Act for high-risk systems
  • The rise of AI governance roles to ensure ethical implementation


“With regulatory landscapes shifting and cyber risks escalating, the 2025 Global Risk Report helps equip businesses with the knowledge needed to stay ahead of evolving threats,” noted digital forensics, data governance, privacy, security, emerging technology, and discovery expert Antonio Rega.


London-based digital investigations and discovery expert Simon Placks joins Antonio Rega to discuss risks and opportunities around AI, data, and digital regulations explored in the J.S. Held 2025 Global Risk Report in this video:



Beyond AI, the J.S. Held 2025 Global Risk Report examines four additional critical risk areas: sustainability, supply chain disruptions, cryptocurrency trends, and cyber risk management. Each section offers actionable strategies to mitigate threats and capitalize on emerging opportunities.


For media inquiries, requests for interviews, or to further discuss the risks and opportunities outlined in the report, email GlobalRiskReport@jsheld.com.


To connect with Simon Placks or Antonio Rega simply click on either expert's icon now.


For any other media inquiries - contact :


Kristi L. Stathis, J.S. Held

+1 786 833 4864

Kristi.Stathis@JSHeld.com

Connect with:
Simon Placks

Simon Placks

Senior Managing Director

EMEA Lead for Digital Investigations & Discovery | Expert in Global Digital Investigations | Global Expert in eDiscovery

Digital TransformationCyber Risk AdvisoryFinancial Crime TechnologyContract Lifecycle Management & AnalyticsSurveillance

You might also like...

Check out some other posts from J.S. Held LLC

2 min

Crosscurrents: Global Sustainability Divides & ESG Compliance, Litigation Risks, and Corporate Responsibility

As sustainability moves from niche topic to boardroom central, companies face an increasingly complex global environment of regulatory divergence, disclosure demands and reputational risk. A recent article by J.S. Held's John Peiserich examines how multinational firms can respond effectively to the “crosscurrents” of ESG compliance, litigation exposure and evolving definitions of corporate responsibility. John Peiserich specializes in environmental risk and compliance. With over 30 years of experience, John provides consulting and expert services for heavy industry and law firms throughout the country with a focus on Oil & Gas, Energy, and Public Utilities, including serving as an expert witness in arbitration proceedings and in state and federal courts. View his profile here Key Insights: Sustainability now touches every major business function — environmental, social, and governance — and must be embedded in strategy rather than treated as an add-on. Regulatory landscapes are diverging: while the U.S. federal approach remains fragmented, individual states like California are moving ahead with mandatory climate and emissions-related corporate disclosures. In contrast, the European Union’s Green Deal and related frameworks promote a more unified regulatory model, creating operational tension for multinational corporations. Litigation and disclosure risk are increasing, with “greenwashing” (overstating sustainability achievements) and “greenhushing” (avoiding or under-reporting ESG performance) emerging as major board-level concerns. Effective risk management now requires scalable data systems, transparent communication, strong governance, and agility to adapt across multiple regulatory regimes. Why this matters: The widening divide between jurisdictions — and intensifying scrutiny of corporate sustainability claims — means ESG compliance can no longer be treated as a checkbox exercise. Organizations that fail to anticipate regulatory expectations or align ESG strategy with business goals risk legal exposure, reputational harm, and missed opportunities for value creation. Strategic Insights for Corporate Leadership on Sustainability Boards and executives must adjust their mindset, seeing sustainability not as a burden but as a catalyst for growth and differentiation. Proactive investment in research, development, and stakeholder engagement will help organizations seize new opportunities and maintain credibility in a fast-changing world. Documentation and transparency are vital defenses against legal challenges, while ongoing monitoring of policy and market trends ensures adaptability. Ultimately, the most successful companies will treat sustainability as an essential tenet of strategy—aligning profit, purpose, and governance to secure their position in the global marketplace. Navigating the crosscurrents of sustainability requires courage, judgment, and a commitment to continuous learning. By embracing these principles, corporations can build a future that is not only profitable but also just, resilient, and worthy of the trust placed in them by shareholders and society alike. Looking to know more or connect with John Peiserich about this important topic? Simply click on his icon now to arrange an interview today.

1 min

The Case for Out-of-Court Winddowns

Boards of directors facing insolvency should consider an out-of-court winddown as a viable alternative to bankruptcy or court-appointed receivership. This approach offers greater discretion and control, helping to safeguard their reputation and maintain constructive relationships with lenders and sponsors. A recent article by J.S. Held's Michael Jacoby, titled "The Case for Out-of-Court Winddowns," provides step-by-step guidance on the out-of-court winddown process and explains why it’s gaining popularity by comparing the pros and cons to more traditional business closure paths. Michael Jacoby, Senior Managing Director and Strategic Advisory Practice Lead of J.S. Held, is a skilled executive with extensive operating, turnaround, restructuring, and M&A experience. Michael has served in advisory capacities as well as an independent director, Chief Restructuring Officer (CRO), investment banker, and interim manager for more than 400 clients in various industries. View his profile here. Why this matters: As financial pressures mount — rising interest rates, tighter credit, private-equity portfolio stress — the flexibility and control of out-of-court winddowns make them a timely alternative. Boards, lenders, and private equity sponsors who recognize this can act faster, protect reputation, and maximize value for stakeholders. Looking to know more? Connect with Michael Jacoby today by clicking on his icon below.

1 min

Unlocking Liquidity Through Fine Art Appraisal and Lending

As financial markets shift, fine art collectors and investors are discovering new ways to unlock liquidity without parting with prized works. Art-backed loans, supported by professional appraisal, allow owners to access capital while maintaining ownership and display rights. This article explores how lenders and borrowers alike can benefit from these arrangements—when supported by rigorous appraisal standards and careful risk management. What’s covered: • The role of USPAP-compliant appraisal in fine art lending • How fair market value differs from insurance replacement value • Loan-to-Value (LTV) ratios and best practices in structuring art-backed loans • Key borrower responsibilities: insurance, storage, and title maintenance • Risk considerations for lenders, including authenticity, liquidity, and due diligence Connect with the Experts Amanda McConaha Senior Fine Art Appraiser Expert in Post-War, Contemporary, and Emerging Fine Art valuations, specializing in collateral loans and insurance appraisals. amanda.mcconaha@jsheld.com Michael Alexander Senior Vice President, Economic Damages & Valuations Brings deep expertise in valuation methodologies, forensic investigations, and financial analysis. michael.alexander@jsheld.com Dalton Campbell Consultant, Economic Damages & Valuations Provides financial and economic analysis with a focus on valuation, estate law, and all stages of pre-litigation and litigation support. dalton.campbell@jsheld.com For any media inquiries, contact : Kristi L. Stathis, J.S. Held +1 786 833 4864 Kristi.Stathis@JSHeld.com.

View all posts