Off-Channel Communications: How Financial Services Organizations Can Address Regulators’ Latest Target

Mar 27, 2025

3 min

Antonio Rega


Off-channel communications (OCC) occur when employees use unapproved and inadequately protected devices – such as personal cellphones – or applications to communicate with co-workers, counterparties and / or clients. Many financial services firms are required to maintain copies of all communications regarding their business, supervise the same, and produce them in response to regulatory requests. Firms cannot meet those compliance obligations when employees resort to unauthorized OCC for business-related matters.


In charging 15 broker-dealers and one affiliated investment advisor in September 2022 with record-keeping violations, the SEC noted that its investigation uncovered employees at all levels of these firms who routinely used text messaging apps on their personal devices to discuss business matters between January 2018 and September 2021 [1]. The firms settled the charges and agreed to pay penalties totaling more than $1.1 billion. Just as important, the firms also agreed to engage independent compliance consultants to ensure the use of OCC meets regulatory standards as part of the settlements.


In a related move [2],  the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) ordered 11 financial institutions to pay more than $710 million for recordkeeping and supervision failures for widespread use of unapproved communication methods such as personal texts, WhatsApp, and Signal. Additionally, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has also taken action when it comes to OCC.



Antonio Rega, digital forensics, data governance, privacy, security, emerging technology, and discovery expert with J.S. Held, observes, “While the current administration has loosened certain regulatory enforcement near-term, we continue to observe requests from clients in supporting management of “off-channel” communications, with a particular focus on 3rd party chat messaging platforms on mobile devices, such as Whatsapp. These inquiries include supporting corporate stakeholders with internal auditing of their organizational platforms, policies and procedures.”


By implementing effective processes and utilizing software and outside experts to monitor and detect OCC, broker-dealers, investment advisers, and other financial institutions can reduce the risk of regulatory enforcement and penalties and ensure that they remain in compliance with regulations.



Steve Strombelline, regulatory and enterprise risk management expert with J.S. Held adds, “Although concerns typically impact broker-dealers, firms outside of financial sectors are looking closely at their messaging processes as well, which is advisable."







In addition to guaranteeing that these communications are properly documented and retained, the regulations are set up to prevent the use of OCC to manipulate securities transactions or commit fraud and to ensure that it is not used to violate any other securities laws. Firms’ supervisory procedures must be reasonably designed to detect for OCC when they monitor for such activity.


The following article discusses the risks that OCC pose for financial services firms, especially as the SEC, FINRA, and the CFTC have made it clear that they are now targeting firms throughout the industry about their OCC to see if they are recording and preserving business information according to regulations.


The piece also explains how firms, including broker-dealers of all sizes, should manage their OCC to ensure that they and their employees comply with federal securities laws and regulations.


Finally, the authors address the complexity related to the collection of OCC in response to regulatory enforcement investigative requests. As the fines and settlements between those firms and the SEC exemplify, financial services firms of all sizes need to take this regulatory focus seriously and take the proactive step of engaging an independent third-party with expertise and experience in both digital forensics and compliance issues.


To read the full article and learn more about the risk of off-channel communications and how companies should manage their OCC to remain compliant, click on the button below:



To connect with Antonio Rega simply click on his icon now.


To arrange a conversation with Steve Strombelline or any other media inquiries - contact :


Kristi L. Stathis, J.S. Held

+1 786 833 4864

Kristi.Stathis@JSHeld.com


References

[1] https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2022-174

[2] https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/8599-22

Connect with:
Antonio Rega

Antonio Rega

Managing Director

Head of Digital Forensics and Information Governance | E-Discovery and Regulatory Compliance Advisor | Global Investigations Leader

Regulatory ComplianceExpert Witness Testimony & Litigation SupporteDiscoveryDigital Forensics Expert WitnessData Privacy & Governance

You might also like...

Check out some other posts from J.S. Held LLC

1 min

Unlocking Liquidity Through Fine Art Appraisal and Lending

As financial markets shift, fine art collectors and investors are discovering new ways to unlock liquidity without parting with prized works. Art-backed loans, supported by professional appraisal, allow owners to access capital while maintaining ownership and display rights. This article explores how lenders and borrowers alike can benefit from these arrangements—when supported by rigorous appraisal standards and careful risk management. What’s covered: • The role of USPAP-compliant appraisal in fine art lending • How fair market value differs from insurance replacement value • Loan-to-Value (LTV) ratios and best practices in structuring art-backed loans • Key borrower responsibilities: insurance, storage, and title maintenance • Risk considerations for lenders, including authenticity, liquidity, and due diligence Connect with the Experts Amanda McConaha Senior Fine Art Appraiser Expert in Post-War, Contemporary, and Emerging Fine Art valuations, specializing in collateral loans and insurance appraisals. amanda.mcconaha@jsheld.com Michael Alexander Senior Vice President, Economic Damages & Valuations Brings deep expertise in valuation methodologies, forensic investigations, and financial analysis. michael.alexander@jsheld.com Dalton Campbell Consultant, Economic Damages & Valuations Provides financial and economic analysis with a focus on valuation, estate law, and all stages of pre-litigation and litigation support. dalton.campbell@jsheld.com For any media inquiries, contact : Kristi L. Stathis, J.S. Held +1 786 833 4864 Kristi.Stathis@JSHeld.com.

2 min

The Growing Importance of the Chief Intellectual Property Officer: A Strategic Imperative for the Knowledge Economy

Intangible assets now make up more than 90% of S&P 500 market value — yet many organizations still lack a dedicated executive role to manage them strategically. This is where the Chief Intellectual Property Officer (CIPO) comes in. In this expert-backed piece, J.S. Held's Chief Intellectual Property Officer James E. Malackowski, CPA, CLP, and his colleague David Ngo unpack the economic forces shaping this role, the skills CIPOs bring to the table, and why forward-thinking companies are making IP leadership a boardroom priority. What you’ll learn: • The economic forces driving the rise of CIPO leadership • How CIPOs bridge legal, technical, and commercial priorities to unlock value • The growing relevance of CIPOs in consulting, insurance, and AI-driven industries • Practical strategies for integrating IP leadership into portfolio and risk management • Why the next decade will define the CIPO’s role in corporate success With deep expertise in IP strategy, valuation, and litigation, Malackowski and Ngo offer a clear, compelling case for elevating IP leadership to the C-suite. Looking to connect with the experts? Click on their profiles to arrange an interview or gain deeper insights into intellectual property strategy, risk, and valuation. James E. Malackowski, CPA, CLP Chief Intellectual Property Officer, J.S. Held | Co-founder and Senior Managing Director, Ocean Tomo Global leader in intellectual property valuation, strategic advisory, and expert testimony. Recognized among IAM’s “World’s Leading IP Strategists” and a pioneer in IP exchange models. David Ngo Senior Analyst, Intellectual Property Disputes Financial Expert Testimony, Ocean Tomo, a part of J.S. Held Specialist in quantifying economic damages in IP disputes and valuing intangible assets, with expertise in applying economic and financial analysis to complex litigation. For any other media inquiries, contact : Kristi L. Stathis, J.S. Held +1 786 833 4864 Kristi.Stathis@JSHeld.com.

1 min

Strategies for Minimizing Rising Risks to Mobile Apps from Privacy Laws

As mobile apps become more central to customer engagement, they’re also drawing closer scrutiny under global data privacy laws. In this expert-backed article, Antonio Rega, Managing Director at J.S. Held, and Ian Cohen, CEO of LOKKER, outline how businesses can identify hidden privacy risks—particularly those created by third-party SDKs and what steps they can take to stay compliant. What’s covered: • How data minimization and purpose limitation apply to mobile architecture • Real-time consent dilemmas and SDK-related exposure • Transparency gaps in mobile data flows • Upcoming enforcement trends and what they signal for app owners With decades of combined experience in digital forensics, risk, and data governance, Rega and Cohen bring sharp insight into a fast-evolving regulatory landscape. Whether you’re developing, auditing, or overseeing mobile platforms, this article breaks down what’s at stake and how to protect both users and your organization. Looking to connect with Antonio Rega? Click on his profile icon to arrange an interview or get deeper insights into data privacy, risk, and mobile app compliance. For any other media inquiries, contact : Kristi L. Stathis, J.S. Held +1 786 833 4864 Kristi.Stathis@JSHeld.com.

View all posts