Featured Post from Augusta University

Will it be a long wait for the results on Tuesday?

Nov 2, 2020

2 min

Gregg Murray, PhD


The election is finally here. And in a year like few others in modern history, the 2020 election may go down like no other as well.


Americans are engaged, there is no doubting that. In fact, CNN reported that with one week before the election 75.8 million ballots had been cast representing about 56% of the more than 136.5 million total ballots cast for president in 2016. And there was still time left for more votes to pour in.



On Election Day, a massive turnout is expected. But with social distancing in play and other COVID-19 precautions enacted, the day that is already wrought with long lines and delays in the best of years could see for an even longer night for election officials in most states.


Americans are making themselves heard – but the results they want to see might not be on election night.


A recent article by Pew Research explains why:


"Mail ballots pose a challenge to election workers, because they must be manually removed from their envelopes and verified as valid before they can be fed into the tabulating machines. Although election workers in at least 33 states can start processing ballots (but not, in most cases, counting them) a week or more before Election Day, these counts may not be finished by election night depending on how many come in. In a half-dozen states, including the battlegrounds of Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, processing can’t start until Election Day itself.


Also, in 22 states (plus D.C.), mail ballots postmarked by Election Day (or in a few cases the day before) can still be counted even if they arrive days later – further lengthening the counting process. Bottom line: Any vote totals reported on election night will be even more unofficial than they typically are."



There is going to be a lot to cover leading up to and after Nov. 03 about the final results of what is poised to be a very close and hard-fought election.


And if you’re covering, that’s where our experts can help.


Dr. Gregg R. Murray, professor of political science at Augusta University, is available to talk about the current race to lead the DNC. Murray’s research focuses on political behavior and psychology with specific interests in voter mobilization and turnout. He is also executive director of the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences.


Connect with:
Gregg Murray, PhD

Gregg Murray, PhD

Professor of Political Science

Murray's research focuses on political behavior and psychology with specific interests in voter mobilization.

Government Responses to COVID-19Research MethodsPolitical BehaviorU.S. GovernmentPublic Opinion
Powered by

You might also like...

Check out some other posts from Augusta University

Augusta University's Simon Medcalfe on the Real Economics of Hosting the World Cup featured image

1 min

Augusta University's Simon Medcalfe on the Real Economics of Hosting the World Cup

With the World Cup underway across the U.S., Canada, and Mexico, Dr. Simon Medcalfe, economist at Augusta University's Hull College of Business, wrote for Augusta Business Daily about why FIFA's headline economic projections for the tournament don't hold up. His piece breaks down why most of the spending tied to hosting the event isn't new activity but rather it's money that would have been spent elsewhere regardless. As Medcalfe put it: "New spending is not created; it is just moved around." Read his full column in Augusta Business Daily :  Dr. Medcalfe is a Professor of Economics and Finance at Augusta University, with research spanning sports economics, community and economic development, and social determinants of health. He holds a PhD in Business/Managerial Economics from Lehigh University. If you're covering the economics of hosting major sporting events, public subsidies for host cities, or the gap between projected and actual tourism impact, Dr. Medcalfe is available for comment. Click on the contact button in his profile below. 

Can a Mother's ZIP Code Shape a Baby's Future? featured image

2 min

Can a Mother's ZIP Code Shape a Baby's Future?

Where an expectant mother lives might reveal important clues about her baby's health before birth. According to a recent Augusta University Jagwire article, researchers at the Medical College of Georgia have found that mapping birth outcomes by ZIP code can help identify communities where mothers and newborns face greater health risks, providing valuable information for healthcare providers and public health officials. The two-part study out of the Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine at the Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, led by Mary Arthur, MD, explored the relationship between neighborhood characteristics and neonatal outcomes. By combining geographic mapping with maternal and infant health data, the researchers identified areas with higher rates of adverse birth outcomes and examined how factors such as access to prenatal care and other social determinants of health might contribute to those disparities. The findings suggest that geographic data can become a valuable tool for improving maternal and infant health. By identifying communities at greater risk, healthcare systems and policymakers can better target prenatal education, outreach programs and healthcare resources to support expectant mothers before complications arise. For journalists covering maternal health, healthcare disparities and public policy, Arthur offers valuable insight into how community-level data can help guide interventions that improve pregnancy outcomes and give more babies a healthier start in life. "The maps make it very easy to visualize those ZIP codes that link to poor neonatal outcomes. They're also helpful for planning strategic interventions to help the people who live in those particular areas in terms of making sure there are outreach programs for mothers in those areas to have access to prenatal care." Mary Arthur, MD To learn more about this important research and connect with Mary Arthur, contact AU's External Communications Team mediarelations@augusta.edu to arrange an interview today.

Can One Gene Change the Future of Heart Disease? featured image

2 min

Can One Gene Change the Future of Heart Disease?

Heart disease remains the world's leading cause of death, but researchers are continuing to uncover the genetic mechanisms that drive it. According to a recent Augusta University Jagwire article highlighting new research, scientists are investigating how a little-studied gene might influence the development of cardiovascular disease and whether it could become a future target for treatment. At the center of the research is Kunzhe Dong, PhD, an investigator at Augusta University's Immunology Center of Georgia, who is examining the role of the SH3BGRL2 gene in cardiovascular cells. While the gene has previously been associated with cancer biology, early findings suggest it might also play an important role in regulating how blood vessels respond to stress and injury. Understanding that relationship could reveal new biological pathways involved in heart disease and identify novel opportunities for precision medicine. The research aims to determine how changes in gene expression affect the function of cardiovascular cells and contribute to disease progression. By better understanding these molecular mechanisms, scientists hope to identify new therapeutic targets and improve the ability to prevent or treat cardiovascular disease before irreversible damage occurs. The work also reflects a broader shift toward precision medicine, where treatments are tailored to the underlying biology of each patient rather than relying solely on traditional risk factors. "This gene is well known in one field, but now we're seeing it's also important in cardiovascular cells." Kunzhe Dong, PhD To learn more about this research and connect with Kunzhe Dong, contact AU's External Communications Team mediarelations@augusta.edu to arrange an interview today.

View all posts
Powered by