What the Roe V. Wade Reversal Means for Data Privacy

Jul 26, 2022

5 min



Following the US Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe V Wade on the 26th June 2022, abortion laws are now changing across states on an almost daily basis. The landmark decision and huge signifier for the rights of women in the United States and across the world of 1973, is now nothing but history. In 13 states with “trigger laws”, abortion laws will take immediate effect, with others being implemented about a month after the ruling. While ‘the patchwork of state laws and barrage of court filings mean that for half the country', the legal status of abortion remains ambiguous, a month on, one thing remains certain - concerns regarding tech companies and the protection of user privacy in regards to abortion cases are only growing.


New questions have been raised and existing debates regarding data privacy have been reignited. Debates center on the extent to which tech companies should protect the information of users seeking abortions and the steps that both consumers and companies can take in line with current laws.


While many large corporations, including tech companies Microsoft, Apple, Meta, Disney, Uber, Netflix and Amazon have announced they will provide travel expenses for abortions if they are not available in the state, the role of tech companies in protecting private users' information remains unclear.


What are the concerns?


Location Tracking


On Tuesday May 24th, 42 Democratic lawmakers urged Google SEO Sundar Pirchai to stop collecting and keeping unnecessary or non-aggregated location data which could be used against people seeking abortions. Before the overruling, the lawmakers wrote “if abortion is made illegal…it is inevitable that right-wing prosecutors will obtain legal warrants to hunt down, prosecute and jail women for obtaining critical and reproductive health care.” In comparison to Apple, which has demonstrated that smartphone companies do not need to retain customer location data, Google ‘has created a new digital divide’, which makes ‘privacy and security a luxury’. Ultimately, privacy for Americans who cannot afford an iPhone is at greater risk.


While Google sent a company-wide email stating they would cover out-of-state travel expenses for abortion, they have still made no statement in response to the Democratic lawmaker's request on customer location data since the rollback of Roe V Wade.


Period-Tracking Apps


Alongside concerns about location tracking data with companies such as Google, one of the newer sources of anxiety in terms of data privacy is the use of cycle tracking apps. Since the draft decision was leaked in early May, there have been widespread concerns over the use of period-tracking apps and calls for American women to delete them to avoid their data being used against them in court.


Danielle Citron, Professor of Law at the University of Virginia School of Law expresses her concern that using such tracking apps could help build a legal case against a woman who has had an abortion. She states "you got your period on X date, you missed your period, then let's say, for example, 20 weeks later you got your period again, and that in that time period your location shows that you went to a clinic either in the state or out of the state — that in so many respects is the circumstantial evidence that a prosecutor needs.”


Tech policy researcher Eva Blum-Dumontet tells Insider that if people find period-tracking apps genuinely useful they shouldn’t feel they have to get rid of them ‘because the risk of data being handed to law enforcement is low’. But at the same time, ‘it is not impossible.'


One of the main period tracking apps, Flo, has issued a statement in response to Roe V Wade which reads ‘we will do everything in our power to protect the data and privacy of our users', with an additional feature to existing security measures including “anonymous mode”, which allows users to remove their personal identity from their Flo account. Flo has stated that more clarity will be given in the coming weeks and months.


Limiting Online Discussion of Abortion Pills and Aid


Since the Supreme Court’s verdict, online memes, statuses and posts have exploded, sharing resources and thoughts on the decision. Facebook and Instagram have started removing posts related to abortion pills, following the rise in the discussion of access to them and offers to mail them across the US. Media intelligence firm Zignal Labs records that general mentions of abortion pills, as well as posts mentioning specific versions such as mifepristone and misoprostol, suddenly spiked on Friday morning across Twitter, Facebook, Reddit and TV Broadcasts.


Following the release of a screenshot obtained by the Associated Press of an Instagram post from a woman who offered to buy and send abortion pills through the mail, being taken down within a few minutes by Instagram, AP decided to test out how Meta would respond to a similar post on Facebook. On Monday, the AP reporter wrote “If you send me your address, I will mail you abortion pills.” The post was removed in under one minute. Interestingly, when the AP reporter made the same post but ‘swapped out the words “abortion pills” for “a gun”, the post remained untouched.’


Can past cases inform the future?


While the response of tech companies in protecting public data regarding the concerns raised above is still relatively ambiguous, we can refer to past cases where smartphone data was used as evidence in cases against women.


In 2018, Lattice Fisher was charged with second-degree murder after she experienced a ‘stillbirth at home and a state medical examiner claimed the baby had been born alive and died of asphyxiation, according to Oktibbeha County court records.’ Fisher’s mobile data records allegedly contained a search for “buy abortion pills”, and mifepristone and misoprostol, the two main forms of self-managed abortion medications. Although Fisher got out of jail later in 2018, Laurie Bertram Roberts, co-founder of the Mississippi Reproductive Freedom Fund and the executive director of Yellow Hammer Fund, who had been heavily involved with Fisher’s bail, said that the impact will forever taint Fisher’s life. “Anytime someone Googles her for a job that mugshot with a story of her being indicted for a second-degree murder will always be there.”


In 2015, Purvi Patel was prosecuted in Indiana under the state’s feticide law after she took safe, well-known abortion medication. Prosecutors had claimed that the baby was born alive and did not survive. In this case, Patel’s text messages mentioning the abortion pills were the main evidence used against her. She was sentenced to 20 years in prison, but her conviction was overturned and she was released after serving 18 months. Many people had wondered how the case had happened when abortion was a protected right under the constitution.


With the right to abortion in the US now only marking a historical moment, the role of tech companies in the protection of user data will only become increasingly pivotal in a post-Roe world.




Powered by

You might also like...

Check out some other posts from ExpertFile

ExpertSpotlight: Ebola: What It Is, How It Spreads, and Whether the Public Should Be Concerned featured image

3 min

ExpertSpotlight: Ebola: What It Is, How It Spreads, and Whether the Public Should Be Concerned

Few diseases in modern history have generated the level of fear associated with Ebola. With graphic symptoms, high mortality rates, and images of overwhelmed treatment centres etched into public memory, Ebola became synonymous with the dangers of global outbreaks long before COVID-19 reshaped how the world thinks about pandemics. But what exactly is Ebola? Where did it come from? How dangerous is it today? And should the public still be worried? A Deadly Virus with a Modern Legacy Ebola virus disease was first identified in 1976 during simultaneous outbreaks in what is now the Democratic Republic of the Congo and South Sudan. The virus was named after the nearby Ebola River, and from the beginning it proved exceptionally dangerous, capable of causing severe hemorrhagic fever with fatality rates that have ranged from 25 to 90 percent depending on the outbreak and available medical care. For decades, Ebola outbreaks were typically isolated to remote regions of Central and West Africa. That changed dramatically in 2014 when the largest Ebola outbreak in recorded history spread through Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone, infecting more than 28,000 people and killing over 11,000. The crisis exposed major weaknesses in global health preparedness and demonstrated how quickly infectious diseases can overwhelm healthcare systems and destabilize economies and communities. The outbreak also fundamentally changed international public health policy. Governments, hospitals, and health organizations around the world began investing more heavily in infectious disease surveillance, emergency response planning, quarantine procedures, and vaccine development. What Ebola Actually Does to the Body Ebola begins much like many common viral illnesses, which can make early detection difficult. Initial symptoms often include: Sudden fever Severe fatigue Muscle pain Headache Sore throat As the disease progresses, patients may develop: Vomiting and diarrhea Rash Liver and kidney impairment Internal and external bleeding Multi-organ failure The virus attacks the immune system and damages blood vessels and organs, often leading to shock and death in severe cases. Patients who survive can still face long-term complications including joint pain, neurological problems, eye disorders, and ongoing fatigue months or even years later. How Ebola Spreads -  And How It Does Not One of the most important public health facts about Ebola is that it does not spread through the air like influenza or COVID-19. Transmission occurs through direct contact with: Blood or bodily fluids of infected individuals Contaminated needles or medical equipment Infected animals Surfaces contaminated with infectious fluids This means Ebola is highly contagious in healthcare settings and among close family caregivers without proper protective equipment, but far less transmissible in casual public settings than many people assume. Funeral practices involving direct contact with deceased individuals have also historically contributed to outbreaks in some regions, making culturally sensitive public health education critically important during containment efforts. Treatments and Vaccines Have Changed the Outlook For years, Ebola was viewed almost as a death sentence. That perception has begun to change. Major advances in medicine and outbreak response have significantly improved survival rates, including: Rapid testing and surveillance systems Specialized isolation units Improved supportive care and hydration Monoclonal antibody treatments Effective vaccines for certain Ebola strains The development of the rVSV-ZEBOV vaccine represented a major breakthrough and has helped contain several recent outbreaks before they expanded into international crises. Global health organizations are now far better equipped to identify and isolate cases quickly compared to the early years of Ebola response. Should the Public Be Worried? Ebola remains a serious and deadly disease, but experts generally emphasize that widespread public panic is not warranted. Most outbreaks remain geographically limited and are aggressively monitored by national governments, the World Health Organization, and international health agencies. Countries with advanced healthcare systems also have far stronger infection prevention and containment capabilities than existed during earlier outbreaks. Still, Ebola continues to command attention because it highlights how interconnected global health has become. International travel, fragile healthcare systems, political instability, climate pressures, and human interaction with wildlife all increase the risk of future outbreaks of emerging infectious diseases. In many ways, Ebola serves as both a warning and a lesson: deadly viruses can emerge unexpectedly, but rapid science, coordinated public health measures, and global cooperation can dramatically reduce their impact. The world’s experience with Ebola helped shape many of the outbreak response systems now used to confront emerging diseases today, and public health experts continue to view it as one of the clearest examples of why pandemic preparedness remains essential. Connect with an expert:

ExpertSpotlight: From Revolution to Ritual: The Enduring Power of May Day Parades in Russia featured image

2 min

ExpertSpotlight: From Revolution to Ritual: The Enduring Power of May Day Parades in Russia

Each year on May 1, images of grand parades, waving flags, and tightly choreographed displays evoke a powerful legacy rooted in ideology, identity, and statecraft. In Russia, May Day—known as International Workers’ Day—has evolved from a revolutionary rallying point into a symbolic expression of national unity, political messaging, and historical continuity. Origins in Revolution and Worker Solidarity May Day celebrations in Russia trace their roots to the late 19th century, inspired by international labour movements advocating for workers’ rights—particularly the push for the eight-hour workday. Following the Russian Revolution, the holiday was institutionalized by the Bolsheviks as a cornerstone of socialist identity. Under leaders like Vladimir Lenin, May 1 became more than a labour holiday—it was a stage for demonstrating the strength and unity of the working class under communist rule. Early celebrations blended grassroots enthusiasm with emerging state control, reinforcing the ideological foundations of the new Soviet state. The Soviet Spectacle: Power on Display During the era of the Soviet Union, May Day parades transformed into highly orchestrated spectacles. Held prominently in Red Square, these events showcased military hardware, industrial achievements, and mass participation from workers, students, and state organizations. Under Joseph Stalin, the parades took on an increasingly propagandistic tone, emphasizing Soviet strength both domestically and to the outside world. Precision choreography, symbolic imagery, and sheer scale reinforced narratives of unity, productivity, and ideological superiority during the Cold War. Post-Soviet Transition: From Ideology to Identity Following the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, the meaning of May Day in Russia shifted significantly. While it remains a public holiday, its overt ideological messaging has softened. Today, events often blend labour advocacy, political expression, and seasonal celebration. Modern observances frequently include rallies organized by trade unions such as the Federation of Independent Trade Unions of Russia, alongside state-supported demonstrations that emphasize national unity and economic stability under leaders like Vladimir Putin. Why May Day Still Matters May Day parades in Russia continue to serve as a barometer of the country’s political and social climate. While the overt revolutionary fervor of the early 20th century has faded, the event remains deeply symbolic: Historical Continuity: A living link to the Soviet past and its defining narratives Political Messaging: A platform for governments to project stability and cohesion Labour Identity: An enduring reminder of workers’ rights and collective action Cultural Tradition: A widely recognized public celebration marking the arrival of spring Expert Insight What makes May Day in Russia particularly compelling is its adaptability. Across more than a century, it has shifted from protest to propaganda to public ritual, each iteration reflecting the priorities of the state and the sentiments of its people. Connect with more experts here: www.expertfile.com

ExpertSpotlight: No Joke: The Curious Origins and Enduring Traditions of April Fools’ Day featured image

2 min

ExpertSpotlight: No Joke: The Curious Origins and Enduring Traditions of April Fools’ Day

Every April 1, the world collectively loosens up. Friends prank friends, brands try to outdo each other with outrageous announcements, and even the most serious newsrooms occasionally get in on the joke. But behind the laughter and “gotcha” moments, the origins of April Fools’ Day are anything but straightforward - and that’s part of what makes it so fascinating. One of the most widely accepted origin stories dates back to 1582 and the Gregorian calendar reform. When France shifted New Year’s celebrations from late March (around April 1) to January 1, not everyone got the memo, or chose to follow it. Those who continued celebrating in spring became the subject of ridicule, often tricked with fake gifts or sent on pointless errands. They were dubbed “April fools,” a label that stuck. Other theories reach even further back, connecting the day to ancient seasonal festivals like Hilaria, where people donned disguises, mocked authority, and celebrated the unpredictable shift into spring. Across cultures, the common thread is clear: a moment in the calendar where normal rules are bent, and mischief is not just accepted - it’s expected. What started as localized traditions has evolved into a global cultural phenomenon. Media outlets, corporations, and public figures now participate in April Fools’ Day with increasingly elaborate hoaxes. Perhaps the most famous example came from the BBC in 1957, when it aired a segment about Swiss farmers harvesting spaghetti from trees, complete with convincing visuals. Viewers were fooled, and a legendary prank was born. Today, in an era of viral content and misinformation, April Fools’ Day walks a fine line between humor and credibility, forcing audiences to question what they see and hear. Beyond the pranks, the day reveals something deeper about human nature. It’s a rare, socially sanctioned opportunity to challenge authority, play with truth, and share in collective amusement. For journalists, it also offers a unique angle: how stories spread, why people believe them, and what it says about trust in media. In a world often dominated by serious headlines, April Fools’ Day reminds us that sometimes, the most powerful connection comes not from facts alone, but from the shared experience of being delightfully fooled. Our experts can help! Connect with more experts here: www.expertfile.com

View all posts