hero image
James Sample - Hofstra University. Hempstead, NY, US

James Sample James Sample

Professor of Law | Hofstra University

Hempstead, NY, UNITED STATES

Professor Sample focuses on voting rights and constitutional issues

Spotlight

Media

Publications:

Documents:

Photos:

Videos:

Hofstra Law Professors Discuss the Impact of Citizens United Decision (2/22/10) James Sample James Sample Reports That Spending in Judicial Elections Has Doubled in the Past Decade

Audio:

Social

Biography

Before joining the Hofstra Law faculty in 2009, Professor Sample served as an attorney in the Democracy Program at the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law since 2005. Before joining the Center, he worked on Brian Schweitzer’s gubernatorial campaign in Montana and clerked for Judge Sidney R. Thomas of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Professor Sample received his JD from Columbia Law School in 2003. While at Columbia, Professor Sample was a Harlan Fiske Stone and James Kent Scholar and served as a Notes Editor on the Columbia Law Review. He has written several publications and legal briefs on the topic of judicial elections, campaign financing, and recusal.

Professor Sample regularly comments on voting rights and constitutional issues in leading media outlets, including The Wall Street Journal, The New York Law Journal, Slate.com, and HuffingtonPost, as well as at national conferences.

Citations to Professor Sample's work on issues related to democracy include in opinions of the United States Supreme Court, articles in the Harvard Law Review, Columbia Law Review, and other leading journals, as well as in major media including The New York Times, Washington Post, The Economist, U.S. News and World Report, The Los Angeles Times, National Public Radio, USA Today, the National Law Journal, as well as inleading blogs and regional outlets throughout the country.

Prior to attending law school, Professor Sample was a 3-time Emmy Award winner for his work as a producer with NBC Sports.

Industry Expertise (1)

Education/Learning

Areas of Expertise (6)

The Supreme Court

Voting Rights

Voting Rights Policy

Constitutional Law

Judicial Elections

Administrative Law

Education (2)

Columbia University: J.D. 2003

Boston College: B.A. 1995

Media Appearances (13)

What the Supreme Court rulings mean for 2 investigations of Trump

Newsday  print

2020-07-09

“The decisions today are a loss for President Trump’s legal theory that he is categorically above the law,” said James Sample, a constitutional law professor at Hofstra Law School. “Politically, however, the White House strategy of obstructing the subpoenas and litigating every last aspect of the case, including the proceedings still to come, means the White House will successfully run out the clock such that voters will continue to be deprived of Trump’s financial records in 2020 just as voters were in 2016.”

view more

Canceled NY Primary Brings Power of Delegates Into Focus

Courthouse News Service  online

2020-05-15

Hofstra law professor James Sample pointed to the assertion by Sanders’ delegates that the cancellation of New York’s election deprives the plaintiff candidates and would-be delegates of their opportunity to shape the party’s policy platform. “In turn, because there will be primary elections in many — but not all — New York jurisdictions, New York’s role in shaping the party’s ‘shapers’ will be undemocratically skewed,” Sample said.

view more

Roger Stone sentenced to 40 months

Voice of America (VOA)  radio

2019-02-20

U.S. President Donald Trump's close friend and confidant Roger Stone was sentenced today to 40 months in prison. Hofstra University law professor James Sample speaks to International Edition about the sentence, the controversy over a number of President Donald Trump’s pardons, and the allegation Jullian Assange has made that the administration offered a pardon to him in exchange for saying that Russia was not involved in 2016 election meddling.

view more

Judge Of 17 Years No Match For The Tangled Web Of Queens Surrogate's Court

Gothamist  online

2019-02-20

“The wealth that is processed through the Surrogate’s Court system in the State of New York is extraordinary, and there is an incredible concentration of authority in a very small handful of people,” said James Sample, a Hofstra University law professor who studies New York’s judicial system. “This is one of those dirty little secrets of New York politics.”

view more

A law professor weighs in on how Trump could beat impeachment

Business Insider  online

2019-11-14

Constitutional law professor James Sample helps explain the impeachment inquiry against President Trump. Features a 4+ minute video with Prof. Sample.

view more

House Democrats Face Tough Choices on Impeachment Approach

Voice of America (VOA)  online

2019-10-24

"...There is at least a significant faction within the House Democrats who want to focus specifically on Ukraine as a way of narrowing the articles of impeachment so as to keep the investigation simple, straightforward, and in many respects, clear cut,” said James Sample, a law professor at Hofstra University in New York.

view more

Brett Kavanaugh lied brazenly and repeatedly under oath. Any law student knows he cannot sit on the Supreme Court.

NBC News  online

2018-10-03

Op-ed by Gowri Ramachandran and James Sample

view more

Neil Gorsuch Has Web of Ties to Secretive Billionaire

The New York Times  

2017-03-14

James Sample, a Hofstra University law professor who has studied Supreme Court recusals, said, “It’s very reasonable to ask a Supreme Court nominee for a more thorough answer” about how he will weigh such decisions, especially since “it seems as though there is a kind of continuous relationship — this is not just a past client.”...

view more

Most Supreme Court Candidates Are Already Assured of Election Day Success

New York Law Journal  

2016-10-20

James Sample, a professor at Hofstra University School of Law and a judicial election expert, said the dominance of the Democratic Party in New York City and the tendency of both Democratic and Republican County leaders outside the city to cross-endorse the same candidates serves to reinforce the control of judicial elections by the major political parties and lessens voter choice on Election Day. "From the perspective of the party leaders, cross-endorsements are a great idea, because it's much more valuable to be able to promise somebody a judgeship, as opposed to a nomination in which they still have a competitive election," Sample said in an interview this week. "If you are looking to extract favors, political or otherwise, being able to effectively promise a 14-year position with a six-figure salary and a whole lot of prestige is a pretty good place to start."...

view more

'Smoke-Filled Rooms' Still Rule New York Judicial Elections

WYNC  

2016-09-08

Vito Lopez told her that to be considered for a nomination, she would need to hire his daughter as a law clerk in her court. She declined. “For rejecting that overture, she was in essence blackballed,” says James Sample, a professor at Hofstra University. Lopez Torres was undaunted. Year after year, she asked Brooklyn Democratic leaders to back her at the annual judicial convention, where elected delegates usually rubber-stamp the party choice. Year after year, they declined. So in 2004, she sued the state board of elections. Sample was part of her legal team. The case felt like a long shot, Sample said. But she won — in the District Court, and the Second Circuit. In 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court weighed in...

view more

Tracing Ward’s path to state judicial bench

The Buffalo News  

2015-03-14

But critics ask whether the new jurist’s reward for fueling the party treasury resulted in the most effortless campaign ever waged by a local judicial candidate. Ward avoided fundraising until after his election was assured, endured no bar association rating process before his nomination, and sat out spring and summer campaigning. It all leads James J. Sample, an associate professor at Long Island’s Hofstra Law School and a longtime critic of the state’s judicial nominating system, to reiterate that “legal acumen means nothing compared to political patronage” in determining who sits on New York’s top trial bench. “In other states, the typical fear of judicial elections is contributions from litigants to candidates,” he said. “In New York, the problem is the candidates themselves have to ante up to become judges.”

view more

How Long Island judges win races before they start

Newsday  

2016-07-26

That troubles legal scholars who have long criticized the state’s judicial selection process. “It’s unseemly, it’s unbecoming; but it’s legal and business as usual for New York judgeships,” said James Sample, a Hofstra University law professor who has studied judicial selection...

view more

Lear Jet Justice in West Virginia? A 'Circus Masquerading as a Court'

ABC News Nightline  tv

2014-12-02

As a $90 million jury verdict was wending its way to the West Virginia Supreme Court, the lawyer handling the nursing home abuse case did more than prepare appellate briefs and ready himself for oral arguments. He was, critics said, pulling every lever available to him to try to give his client an edge outside the legal system -- lining up thousands of dollars in campaign contributions for the court’s chief justice and negotiating a private deal to buy a $1.3 million Lear Jet from her husband. When the nursing home case finally reached the state’s high court earlier this year, Chief Justice Robin Jean Davis wrote the majority opinion upholding the jury verdict for the client of lawyer Michael Fuller, though lowering the final payout to just over $40 million. The cut for Fuller’s firm: more than $17 million -- one of the largest payouts he’s ever secured. Davis never disclosed the airplane deal, telling ABC News she was under no obligation to do so because it involved her husband, and not her. But ethics experts have questioned that assertion. “This does not look good for the rule of law,” said James Sample, an expert on judicial ethics at Hofstra University Law School. “A million-dollar sale of an airplane while litigation involving the lawyer who purchases the airplane is pending before the court? Absolutely no question. It’s proper to disclose, and it is improper to not disclose. This is a circus masquerading as a court.”

view more

Event Appearances (1)

The Agnostic’s Guide to Judicial Selection

Symposium: The Impact of Dark Money on Judicial Elections and Judicial Behavior  DePaul University College of Law

2017-04-20

Articles (3)

Supreme Court Recusal: From Marbury to the Modern Day Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics

2013 For Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, controversies pitting personal conflicts — whether actual or merely alleged — against the constitutional commitment to the rule of law increasingly form the basis of a caustic and circular national dialogue that generates substantially more heat than light. While the profile of these controversies is undoubtedly waxing, the underlying tensions stretch back at least to Marbury v. Madison. For all its seminal import, in Marbury, Chief Justice John Marshall adjudicated a case involving the validity of judicial commissions Marshall had himself signed and sealed. Equally remarkably, one of those judicial commissions belonged to Marshall’s own brother James...

view more

Retention Elections 2.010 University of San Francisco Law Review

2012 Counter-historically, the highest profile judicial election campaigns of the first judicial elections cycle following the Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission were retention and ballot measure, rather than contested elections. Retention elections, in which voters cast their ballots either in favor of returning the incumbent judge to office for another term or for her removal, were intended to balance the values of judicial impartiality and accountability to the public...

view more

Caperton: Correct Today, Compelling Tomorrow Syracuse Law Review

2010 This symposium article asserts that Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co. is correct in result; correct in its narrowness; and correct in calling on courts to be more rigorous in recusal than due process requires. The article argues that Caperton is a model of judicial restraint and that, paradoxically for a decision overturning a state justice's non-recusal, the majority's approach is a model of cooperative federalism. These characteristics are particularly exemplified by the degree to which the opinion tracks the counsel offered by the Conference of Chief Justices, both as to what the opinion decides, and as to what it does not decide...

view more