Nikolay Osadchiy

Associate Professor of Information Systems & Operations Management Emory University, Goizueta Business School

  • Atlanta GA

Contact

Emory University, Goizueta Business School

View more experts managed by Emory University, Goizueta Business School

Media

Social

Biography

Nikolay Osadchiy is an Associate Professor of Information Systems & Operations Management at Emory University's Goizueta Business School. His research interests are in supply chain management, where he studies productivity, risk, and resiliency in supply networks, and in revenue management where he studies the impact of behavioral regularities on pricing. He has published in the leading academic journals including Management Science, Operations Research, Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, and Production and Operations Management. He serves as a Senior Editor at Production and Operations Management. Nikolay's practice-focused work has been published in Harvard Business Review and MIT Sloan Management Review. He regularly contributes to the media commenting on the current issues and developments in supply chains.

Nikolay has taught Supply Chain Management and Process and Systems Management courses in the BBA, MBA, and Professional MBA programs, Supply Chain Analytics in the MSBA program, and an Operations Management seminar in the PhD program. He holds a PhD in Operations Management from the New York University Stern School of Business.

Education

New York University Leonard N. Stern School of Business

PhD

Operations Management

2010

New York University Leonard N. Stern School of Business

MPhil

Operations Management

2008

Areas of Expertise

Supply Networks
Supply Chain Management
Risk and Resilience
Empirical Methods in Operations Management
Operations-Finance Interface
Revenue Management

Publications

Trade Credit and Customer Portfolio Approach to Managing Cash Flow Variability

Manufacturing and Service Operations Management

2025-05-20

Cash flow variability is driven by operational decisions and influences operating performance and valuation. Despite this and the early role that operations management scholarship had on cash flow management theory, the prevailing approaches for managing cash flow variability focus on financial remedies. Our research extends this set of remedies by proposing customer portfolio management and selective trade credit as operational hedges for reducing cash flow variability. We empirically validate our proposal by studying a causal relationship between new customer acquisitions and cash-flow variability using a large database of customer-supplier relationships that we join with quarterly financial reports. We strengthen the inferences from this analysis by assembling random samples of customers for each firm in our study and show that the firms’ actual customer portfolios yield lower cash variability compared with the counterfactual sets of randomly sampled customers. Using aggregate and link-level trade credit data, we show that trade credit harmonization is associated with reduced cash flow variability. Our analysis shows that firms can reduce their cash variability by (i) pursuing customers with desirable order patterns that offset the cash flow variability from serving legacy customers and (ii) selectively offering customers trade credit that harmonizes payment terms in the customer portfolio.

View more

Outsourcing as a Risk Management Mechanism for Domestic Manufacturing Capacity Investment

Foundations and Trends® in Technology, Information and Operations Management:

2024-08-01

We propose two perspectives on the shift from U.S. domestic manufacturing to Asia in 1990–2011: production cost arbitrage and the management of supply-demand mismatch. In our model, a firm facing demand uncertainty decides between investing in domestic or overseas production capacity. The model predicts greater investment overseas when the cost arbitrage is high, switching cost is low, demand volatility is high, and the systematic risk in demand is above a certain threshold. Empirically, we observe strong support for the cost arbitrage motive in 1990–2000 and the risk management motive in 2001–2011, i.e., after China’s entry into the WTO. We estimate that investing into risk mitigation could have saved more than 400,000 U.S. manufacturing jobs.

View more

Inventory Productivity and Stock Returns in Manufacturing Networks

Manufacturing and Service Operations Management

2023

We provide a novel, supply network-based perspective on inventory productivity and incentives for its improvement. Using data from 2003 to 2019, we find that inventory productivity is lower materially and statistically for firms located upstream in the supply network, and higher for high degree and more central firms. Firms with high inventory productivity show high equity valuations and abnormal returns, with both valuations and abnormal returns amplified for upstream, low degree, and peripheral firms. Moreover, the difference in valuations and abnormal returns between best and worst performing firms is greater upstream, suggesting that financial markets offer outsized rewards for improving inventory productivity to upstream firms. We show that the information about firm’s upstreamness and centrality in the supply network is a valuable predictor of its inventory productivity and financial performance. Our methods for evaluating upstreamness are useful for that purpose. For operations managers and firm executives, our results highlight strong incentives for inventory productivity improvement upstream in the supply network. For investors, we show that supply network position data can sharpen inventory-based arbitrage opportunities.

View more

Show All +

Research Spotlight

3 min

Upstream or downstream thinking? What’s the best way for suppliers to go mainstream and reach the most customers?

You might have heard of the beer distribution game. The idea is that a group of participants enact a four-stage supply chain scenario. Some take on the role of those at the point of origin in the supply chain – the upstream agents: manufacturers and distributors. Others role-play the downstream agents at the other end of the chain – the distributors and end-customers: in this case, let’s say the bar owners and beer drinkers. The goal is simple. All you have to do is produce, deliver and sell the beer to your customers, while keeping your costs on back orders and inventory to a minimum. This should be easy enough, in theory. The basic rules of economics suggest that customer demand dictates supply. In practice, however, things can get a little skewed. And this disconnect can happen fast. For a start, players have limited information. They can only see what’s in front of them – bits of paper with order numbers. And as they start to share this information with each other, all kinds of coordination issues arise. Things start to go wrong. Customer demand for X or Y kegs of beer is imperfectly relayed to the bar owner retailer, who in turn passes it on the other players upstream, but makes mistakes in doing so. The result is a kind of Chinese Whispers where confusion reigns, poor decisions are made about stock, too much or too little beer is manufactured or supplied. You end up with increased costs in the supply chain, and, not to mention thirsty beer drinkers. The beer game is just that – a game. But it represents a problem that is all too familiar to suppliers in most industries and sectors. It’s called the Bullwhip effect, and it’s a conundrum. “The Bullwhip effect is a real challenge for suppliers in every industry,” said Nikolay Osadchiy, associate professor of Information Systems & Operations Management at Goizueta Business School. “Because demand information gets distorted along the chain, suppliers can see a lot of volatility at their end which can translate into more inventory and drives up costs. It’s a really pressing issue that needs to be addressed.” Osadchiy and his colleagues Bill Schmidt from Cornell University and Jing Wu from the Chinese University of Hong Kong got to work researching the idea. First, they modeled a supply network based on 15 years of data from publicly traded companies across the globe. Second, they determined the ‘upstreamness’ that different firms had – or the positions they occupy – within that network. And third, they examined the demand distortion within each firm and measured demand variability across the different layers of the network to determine how they affect each other. The results of their work were all captured in the article attached below – the information was quite compelling and will greatly assist businesses as they plan their way through and after a globe-shifting event like COVID-19. It’s interesting material for sure – and if you are a journalist looking to know more about supply chains and how businesses will need to adapt in order to survive post-pandemic, then let our experts help with your questions and coverage. Nikolay Osadchiy is an Associate Professor of Information Systems & Operations Management at Emory University's Goizueta Business School. He is an acclaimed expert in the areas of supply chain management and how supply networks affect risk and operational performance. Nikolay is available to speak with media regarding this topic – simply click on his icon to arrange an interview today.

Nikolay Osadchiy

1 min

Forecasting sales using financial stock market data

Firms use many kinds of data for forecasting future sales—one of the key activities in the management of a business—and combine various methods in order to utilize different types of information. A recent study by Nikolay Osadchiy, assistant professor of information systems and operations management; Vishal Gaur (Cornell); and Sridhar Seshadri (UT Austin) focuses on financial stock market data in developing a new methodology for firm-level sales forecasting, testing it against standard benchmarks such as forecasts from equity analysts and time-series methods. Applying their method to the forecast of total annual sales for US public retail firms, the researchers find their market-based approach achieves an average 15 percent reduction in forecasting error compared with more typical forecasting methods. Their model, they write, can also be applied to hedging operational risk with financial instruments. Source:

Nikolay Osadchiy

1 min

Markdown Management and Shopping Behavior

Consumers face the trade-off of immediately paying tag price for an item or waiting for a time when it might be marked down but out of stock. In new research, Nikolay Osadchiy, assistant professor of information systems & operations management, Manel Baucells (U of Virginia), and Anton Ovchinnikov (Queen’s U) argue that retailers can better optimize markdowns by paying more attention to this particular type of consumer behavior. The researchers approach the consumer waitor-buy decision as a “multidimensional trade-off between the delay in getting an item, the likelihood of getting it, and the magnitude of the price discount.” Those dimensions need not be independent; for example, the consumer patience (or sensitivity to delay) could depend on the magnitude of markdown. By optimizing the model, they find that retailers can substantially increase revenues by offering larger markdowns than the current state of the art suggests. In the experiments involving business school students as well as Amazon Mturk participants, which is an on-demand, scalable workforce, the trio found that the expected revenue gains are between 1.5% and 2%. Source:

Nikolay Osadchiy
Show More +

In the News

Georgia warehouses say they see the impact on tariffs, so could it trickle down to consumers?

WSBTV  tv

2025-05-08

US ports are also feeling the effect.

“The number of docks at the ports of LA declined roughly 40%. And we expect to see a similar decline in East Coast ports in the coming weeks,” Emory Professor Nikolay Osadchiy said.

Osadchiy said the tariffs have reduced demand to bring in new products and led to some ships canceling trips or skipping ports.

View More

McDonald’s and GM Boast Positive Q4 Earnings to End 2022 on a High Note

MarketScale  online

2023-02-07

Financial markets have been doing well recently, and there are several factors explaining that in my opinion. First, supply chain pressures are easing and trade flows are starting to normalize, so that’s definitely great news, and markets typically react well to supply chains working smoothly.

View More

A sign of the economic times: Ships lined up at Savannah port

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution  online

2021-09-29

“We used to have an efficient system where everything on the supply chain was synchronized,” said Nikolay Osadchiy, an associate professor who teaches supply chain management at Emory’s Goizueta Business School. “Right now, it’s not predictable at all.”

View More

Show All +