Villanova University was founded in 1842 by the Order of Saint Augustine. To this day, Villanova’s Augustinian Catholic intellectual tradition is the cornerstone of an academic community in which students learn to think critically, act compassionately and succeed while serving others. Villanova prepares students to become ethical leaders who create positive change everywhere life takes them.


The strength of the Villanova experience comes in part from the University’s welcoming community. All members are bonded together by a shared responsibility to uphold the ideals of Saint Augustine and let the principles of truth, unity and love guide their lives. The Villanova community helps students grow intellectually, professionally and spiritually, and challenges them to reach their full potential.


The University’s rigorous academic experience, rooted in the liberal arts, forms an environment in which students and professors are partners in learning. The Villanova community is dedicated to providing a personalized experience that fosters every student’s intellectual and spiritual well-being. As part of their education, students are encouraged to enrich their own lives by working for those in need. Through academic and service programs, students use their knowledge, skills and compassion to better the world around them.


There are more than 10,000 undergraduate, graduate and law students in the University’s six colleges—the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, the Villanova School of Business, the College of Engineering, the College of Nursing, the College of Professional Studies and the Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law. These colleges are the setting for an experience that develops both the heart and the mind, and creates the atmosphere where students are called to ignite change.


Villanova University is located in a suburban community 12 miles west of Philadelphia, Pa.

Villanova University

New Row

Contact expert @[Full Name](fullname), @[Job Title](job_title) at @[Organization](organization) for media, speaking, professional opportunities and more.

@[Full Name](fullname) at @[Organization](organization) | Contact Form

Expert Inquiry

Open Sans

Recipient, Gerald A. Dougherty Endowed Faculty Award for Undergraduate Teaching

2010, 2016 & 2017
Villanova School of Business

Finalist, Gerald A. Dougherty Endowed Faculty Award for Undergraduate Teaching

Recipient, Faculty Advisor Award

Recipient, Junior Faculty Award

Recipient, Christian R. and Mary F. Lindback Award for Outstanding Teaching

2006, 2008 & 2011
Villanova School of Business

Finalist, Christian R. and Mary F. Lindback Award for Outstanding Teaching

Honorable Mention, Christian R. and Mary F. Lindback Award for Outstanding Teaching

Distinguished Member, National Society of Collegiate Scholars

National Association for Business Economics (NABE)

Visiting Economics Professor, John Cabot University (Rome, Italy)

Testing the Effectiveness of Regulation and Competition on Cable Television Rates

On Measuring Competitive Viability and Monopoly Power in Cable: An Empirical Cost Approach

Dr. Mary Kelly's primary research interests focus on the impact that industry structure and public policy have on costs and prices. Her empirical work specifically examines these relationships in the telecommunications and media industries. She regularly provides commentary and analysis of telecom and cable issues on her blog and for media outlets. In her current work, Dr. Kelly also examines the impact of non-standard work arrangements on job satisfaction and overall well-being, controlling for occupation type, gender and other job and demographic characteristics.

Cable Industry

Telecommunication

Comcast

Job Satisfaction 

Public Policy

Industrial Organization and Regulation

Alternative Work Arrangements

Business

Blog: Media Convergence

If Comcast Loses Fox to Disney, CEO Brian Roberts Still Has Options

Disney vs. Comcast Showdown: Who Needs the Fox Assets More?

Pros, Cons for Investing in Charter Communications

Opinion: When It Comes to Regulating the Internet, Does It Matter What We Call It?

Under Brian Roberts, Comcast Has Grown More Than 100-Fold

Is the AT&T-Time Warner Merger Toxic for Consumers? Some Advocates, Customers Think So

Villanova Institute for Teaching and Learning (VITAL) Minigrant

Villanova School of Business Teaching Innovation Grant

the-economics-of-unionization-

Associate Chair and Teaching Professor of Economics | Villanova School of Business

Associate Professor of Economics; Director of the Villanova Women's Professional Network| Villanova School of Business

Last month, workers at an Amazon warehouse in Staten Island voted to unionize. In the decision's wake, employees across other firms—backed by national labor organizations—are following suit. 

 Villanova University economics professor Cheryl Carleton, PhD, explains that the successful warehouse unionization in New York (a grassroots initiative) is changing the way we view labor unions. 

"It prevents employees from thinking about unions as just the large existing unions," notes Dr. Carleton. "Workers themselves can coalesce and maintain a unified front to negotiate for what they need from firms." And if unions succeed, firms without unions must compete to entice employees to their operations. 

As a counterweight to growing unionization efforts, companies have increasingly engaged in the use of intimidation tactics. We see this in the ways firms retaliate against union organizers. 

"Many large firms that have lots of money and have fostered strong relationships with political powers do not want to let workers have a stronger voice in negotiation of wages, benefits and work rules. They will try to have these unions nullified or intimidate workers not to join them," says Dr. Carleton. "There has been considerable consolidation in industries in the United States, which gives firms a lot more power."

And according to economics professor Mary Kelly, PhD, "firms will argue that if they compensate existing [union-represented] workers with higher pay, better benefits and improved working conditions, those higher costs will limit the number of new workers hired, encourage the replacement of some labor with capital/technology if possible and/or 'force' prices higher to consumers."

But even if unionization fails, there are still costs to the company. "We see this now with companies increasing the benefits they provide and spending more money to prevent more unionization efforts.  The 'spillover' effects of the presence or threat of unions increases cost to firms," says Dr. Carleton.  

But we still don't know the final economic impact of unionization. "Companies, the stock market and shareholders always respond to change and uncertainty, so when a company unionizes it is a period of uncertainty," says Dr. Carleton. "If the company does unionize, does it create more stability and more profitability? Or does it end up being more costly for the firm? Time will tell!"

Despite all the uncertainty, "the idea of unions and the need for unions is still present, and the current labor market situation has given workers the impetus they need," Dr. Carleton says. "Unions are necessary to stand up to industries. Each worker has little power, but combined workers have a stronger voice."




The Economics of Unionization 

whats-ahead-for-californias-gig-workers

A new law is set to take effect in California on January 1 that could significantly shift the landscape for the "gig economy" and freelancers across the state: Assembly Bill 5 (or AB 5) will require businesses to reclassify workers like ridesharing and food app delivery drivers as employees and not contractors, giving them access to minimum wage and benefits such as overtime, workers' compensation and health insurance. 

Another group that's targeted in the legislation are freelance journalists. (Vox Media, the parent company of sports site SB Nation, has already taken action and laid off hundreds of freelancers before the law goes into effect.) 

Villanova University professor Cheryl Carleton, PhD, is an expert on labor economics and the workforce who, in conjunction with Mary Kelly, PhD, recently published research on alternative work arrangements and job satisfaction. "By making them regular employees of the company, workers that firms do hire would gain some benefits, and the government may gain some unemployment insurance payments," Dr. Carleton said about California's AB 5 legislation. "Such a law may be great for them. However, other workers will be worse off because they will be losing just what they wanted—the ability to work when and where they want."

"Some of these workers may already have needed benefits through a spouse or significant other or through another job," she continued. "Perhaps they are retired and already have access to those benefits. Still, other workers may not be able to take a regular job with its rigid hours, so they will not be able to work at all."

Dr. Carleton also noted that there is a larger issue about how benefits are provided in our economy. 

"Benefits such as medical insurance, pensions and sick and disability leave are provided through one's place of employment. To the extent that these other working arrangements are growing in popularity, the best approach may be for us to rethink how such benefits are offered," she shared. "It may be that more should be offered by the government to citizens, which then would allow them the ability to choose the job(s) they want that fill the needs they have."

To speak with Dr. Carleton or Dr. Kelly, please click on the "View Profile" links featured on this page.



What's Ahead for California's Gig Workers?

Select Inquiry Type