How Will Rate Cuts Affect the Election?

Sep 27, 2024

2 min

Jeff Haymond, Ph.D.

On September 18, the Federal Reserve established the first interest rate cut since the Covid pandemic in 2020. The Fed lowered the federal funds rate by half a percentage point – a much larger change than the typical quarter percentage point cut. 



Dr. Jeff Haymond, dean of the Robert W. Plaster School of Business at Cedarville University, shared insight about the motivations behind this rate cut in a recent interview. Here are some key points:


  • The United States' national debt has been described as a "ticking time bomb." What impact will this and future interest rate cuts have on the national debt?
  • In light of this recent move, current presidential candidate Donald Trump has articulated his economic plan to put a cap on credit card interest rates. Would this bring down the cost of living in the United States, or will it lead to less options for the consumer?
  • This slashing of the interest rate comes only a short time before the presidential election, with many claiming that this cut was, in fact, a political move. Will it affect the decisions of voters as the election draws near?


If you are covering the recent interest rate cut or potential for future cuts and need to know more, let us help with your questions and stories. 


Dr. Jeff Haymond is an expert on this subject and is available to speak to media regarding the action of the Federal Reserve and what this means for families in the United States – simply click on his icon or email mweinstein@cedarville.edu to arrange an interview.













Connect with:
Jeff Haymond, Ph.D.

Jeff Haymond, Ph.D.

Dean, School of Business Administration/Associate Professor

Research interests include economics and religion, as well as monetary theory

Financial Markets (General)Federal Trade Reserve PolicyFree TradeMinimum Wage / UnemploymentGovernment Regulation
Powered by

You might also like...

Check out some other posts from Cedarville University

Upcoming Jobs Report Will Test the Strength Behind Employment Headlines featured image

2 min

Upcoming Jobs Report Will Test the Strength Behind Employment Headlines

The next U.S. jobs report will offer a fresh look at the labor market as households and businesses assess the economy’s direction. The Bureau of Labor Statistics is scheduled to release October employment figures Friday, November 6, at 8:30 a.m. Eastern. The release will provide updated measures of hiring, unemployment and earnings, helping clarify whether employers are expanding their workforces and how workers are faring. Understanding the report requires looking beyond a single headline. Payroll growth and the unemployment rate come from separate surveys that measure different aspects of employment. The payroll survey counts jobs and tracks hours and earnings, while the household survey measures people’s employment status and produces the unemployment rate. Because their definitions and methods differ, the measures can move in different directions without contradicting each other. For example, employers can add jobs while unemployment rises if more people enter the labor force and begin searching for work. Wage gains also require context: a larger paycheck provides less financial relief when everyday prices rise just as quickly. Examining hiring alongside participation, earnings and industry differences can therefore reveal more about workers’ circumstances than the overall job count alone. For families, the stakes include job opportunities, income and confidence in making major purchases. For businesses, the figures can inform decisions about staffing and expansion. Dr. Jared Pincin, associate professor of economics at Cedarville University, brings relevant expertise to interpreting those connections. The central question is what the report’s combined measures reveal about economic opportunity—and whether the gains Americans see in national statistics translate into greater financial stability. 

Rising Measles Cases Put Public Health Communication in Focus featured image

2 min

Rising Measles Cases Put Public Health Communication in Focus

The continued spread of measles is drawing attention to both disease prevention and how health officials explain risks to the public. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported 4,852 confirmed U.S. cases through October 29, more than twice the 2,289 cases recorded during all of 2025. With 96% of this year’s cases associated with outbreaks, the figures underscore the importance of helping communities understand how the disease spreads and who faces the greatest risks. Measles spreads through the air and can cause complications including pneumonia and brain inflammation. Young children, pregnant women and people with weakened immune systems are among those at higher risk of severe complications. The CDC identifies vaccination as the best protection, with two doses of the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine approximately 97% effective at preventing measles. Communicating those facts clearly gives families a foundation for discussing their circumstances with health professionals. The communication challenge extends beyond publishing case totals. Families need understandable explanations of what an exposure means, how local conditions affect their risk and where to turn with questions. Effective outreach must also distinguish established evidence from uncertainty, acknowledge concerns respectfully and explain the reasoning behind recommendations. Those tasks become particularly consequential when people encounter conflicting claims about the same disease. How can health professionals communicate urgency while building trust? Dr. Zach Jenkins, professor of pharmacy practice at Cedarville University, has training and clinical experience in infectious diseases and has helped community stakeholders, policymakers and media outlets understand public health issues. His background provides a relevant perspective on explaining outbreak risks and translating medical evidence into information families can use. 

Manufacturing Gains Highlight the Tension Between Growth and Rising Costs featured image

1 min

Manufacturing Gains Highlight the Tension Between Growth and Rising Costs

U.S. manufacturing activity strengthened in October, offering an encouraging sign for the economy while highlighting continued pressure on business costs. The Institute for Supply Management’s report released November 2 showed its manufacturing index rising to 55.5 from September’s 54.5. A reading above 50 indicates expansion. Production accelerated, but manufacturers also reported rising input prices and slower supplier deliveries, illustrating why stronger factory activity does not necessarily bring immediate relief from inflation. The report’s pricing measure declined from September but remained well above the threshold indicating increasing costs. That distinction matters: fewer manufacturers reporting price increases does not mean the materials they purchase have become cheaper. Survey respondents also described uncertainty surrounding pricing, trade policy and delivery times. Together, those pressures can complicate decisions about purchasing equipment, adding employees and committing to long-term contracts, even when orders remain strong. For consumers, the question is how businesses respond. Manufacturers facing higher expenses may absorb some costs through lower profit margins, seek more efficient production methods or pass increases along to customers. Stronger production could help meet demand, but its effect on affordability depends partly on whether supply keeps pace and cost pressures ease. These developments raise a broader question: How much can manufacturing grow before rising expenses begin to limit its gains? Dr. Jared Pincin, associate professor of economics at Cedarville University, brings relevant expertise to examining how business costs, consumer prices and economic policy interact—and why encouraging production figures can coexist with financial strain. 

View all posts