Part 1: Collaborating with Faculty Experts: A How-To Guide for Marketing Departments & Deans

Dec 10, 2019

4 min

Deanne TaenzerPeter Evans


“I don’t have time to do this.”

“I don’t think I’m the right expert.”

“My subject area is too specific.”


Have you ever approached a faculty member with an opportunity to speak to the media or perhaps speak at an event, only to hear responses like these? Asking certain faculty members to help serve as experts can be challenging. While it’s becoming more widely accepted by faculty that responding to such requests is a great way to build their personal reputation – as well as the institution’s – there is still work to be done in this area.


With my experiences I wanted to share some useful tips to help you better collaborate with your faculty and get more results:



1. Walk the Halls: Stay Connected to Important Faculty Research & Publications


Faculty play a key role in helping you tell compelling stories to a variety of audiences such as media, prospective donors and students. Yet it’s amazing how many communications people are disconnected from important discoveries their experts are working on. They get caught up in day-to-day events and struggle to find time to walk the campus. The first step in collaborating with your faculty is showing them you care. Make yourself approachable as a resource to help them communicate their stories and you’ll see dramatic results. While it may be tough, it is worth the time investment.



2. Take Inventory: Assess Which Experts Can Be Most Valuable in Helping You Engage Various Audiences


With so many faculty members across the campus involved in a wide range of activities, it’s important to develop a framework that identifies who you should be working with. While faculty have deep subject-matter expertise, not all are suited to helping with certain engagements such as broadcast media interviews. To better assess your faculty look at these key factors:


Credibility


  • Does the expert have a deep understanding of their focus area?
  • How respected are they among their peers?
  • Have they conducted research in this area?
  • Have they been published?
  • Have they spoken at conferences or received awards for their work?


Relevance


  • Is their field of research relevant to various audiences such as Media, Prospective Students, Donors and Partners?


Engagement


  • How are their writing skills?
  • Do they have experience with public speaking to various audiences?
  • Can they conduct an interview with a reporter?
  • Are they willing to participate or get media training?


Responsiveness


  • Do they understand the significant value they can contribute in helping you build your institution’s reputation?
  • Are they comfortable with being in the spotlight?
  • Can they be available on short notice (within hours) for media interviews?
  • Are they interested in building their own personal brand?



3. Get Alignment: Get Senior Leadership on the Bus


Consulting with Faculty Deans and other leaders on the campus will help you gain important support for your efforts to work more with faculty. Identifying their objectives at a program level will help you ensure that your work isn’t viewed as another “make work” exercise for faculty. Show them how your work with faculty experts will have potential to impact the following:


  • Brand reputation in the community and among peers
  • Media coverage
  • Increased student enrolment
  • Better Alumni engagement
  • Increased donations to the school
  • Government and research funding
  • Corporate partnerships



4. Tap into Peer-to-Peer Power: Focus on Faculty


Evangelists


We all know who our “go-to” faculty are. The people who will enthusiastically help you try out some new approaches. These are the faculty who are doing great research but also can tell a great story and are respected among their colleagues. Identify a manageable group (a range of 3-6 experts is a good number to start). Assess them using the criteria we discuss in point #2. Then get these select experts to invest a little time with you to work on topic strategies and content development. Explain to them what you are trying to achieve and listen to their feedback. Getting their support, and helping them develop their content and stories is the key to success. As evangelists, they can be vital to getting buy-in across the campus.



5. “Opt-In” your Experts: Look for Different Types of Contribution


While media coverage is a big focus for many organizations it often tends to dominate the discussion about experts. Think about the ways your experts can contribute and help you tell your story to a variety of audiences beyond media (see point #3). Faculty can be engaged in a broad spectrum of activities such as:


  • Television
  • Radio
  • Print
  • Research on specific topics
  • Blog posts
  • Podcasts
  • Speaking at conferences
  • Speaking at student recruiting events
  • Attending or speaking at alumni events
  • Attending or speaking at donor events



Build a “Contributions List” that outlines activities where you may need support and get faculty to opt-in. Getting this agreement in advance allows you to better assess where you have “bench strength” to plan for specific projects. At the end of the day, you won’t get 100% of the faculty to jump on board, but we have seen that a good plan and collaborative communication raises engagement and participation.



READ PART II of Collaborating with Faculty Experts: A How-To Guide for Organizations.



Connect with:
Deanne Taenzer

Deanne Taenzer

Vice President

Connecting Experts, Thought Leaders and Great Minds

Digital Content to engage AudiencesCoaching and Team LeadershipCloud ApplicationsCloud Based ServicesHigher Education
Peter Evans

Peter Evans

Co-Founder & CEO

Recognized speaker on expertise marketing, technology and innovation

Media TrendsThought LeadershipMarketingTechnologyInnovation
Powered by

You might also like...

Check out some other posts from ExpertFile

Brexit at 10: A Decade After the Vote That Changed Britain featured image

2 min

Brexit at 10: A Decade After the Vote That Changed Britain

On June 23, 2016, voters in the United Kingdom made a historic decision that would reshape the country's relationship with Europe and reverberate around the world. Ten years later, Brexit remains one of the most significant political and economic events of the modern era, with its effects still being felt across trade, immigration, governance, and international relations. While the United Kingdom formally left the European Union in 2020, debate continues over Brexit's long-term impact. Supporters point to greater national sovereignty and independent trade policy, while critics highlight economic challenges, labour shortages, and new barriers to commerce. The referendum's legacy has also influenced political movements beyond Britain, sparking broader conversations about globalization, national identity, and the future of multinational institutions. As policymakers, businesses, and citizens assess a decade of change, experts are examining what Brexit has achieved, where it has fallen short, and what it reveals about the evolving relationship between democracy, economics, and national sovereignty. Covering - we can help! We have experts available to discuss the origins of Brexit, its lasting consequences, and what the next decade may hold for the United Kingdom and Europe. Topic and Questions to Consider: The political history and causes of Brexit U.K.–European Union relations Trade, investment, and economic impacts Immigration and labour market policy Nationalism, populism, and democratic movements The future of Scotland, Northern Ireland, and the United Kingdom Britain's role in global affairs after Brexit Lessons from Brexit for policymakers around the world Key Questions What factors drove the Brexit vote in 2016? How has Brexit changed Britain's economy and trade relationships? What impact has Brexit had on immigration and labour markets? Has Brexit strengthened or weakened the United Kingdom's global influence? How have Scotland and Northern Ireland been affected? What lessons can other countries learn from Brexit? Could the U.K. and European Union move toward closer cooperation in the future? What does Brexit reveal about voter attitudes toward globalization and national sovereignty? Our leading experts can provide analysis on the political, economic, and social legacy of Brexit, the evolving relationship between the United Kingdom and the European Union, and the broader implications for democracies navigating questions of identity, sovereignty, and international cooperation. Connect with an expert today:

From Economic Crisis to Global Influence: The Evolution of the G7 featured image

2 min

From Economic Crisis to Global Influence: The Evolution of the G7

The world's attention is once again focused on the G7 as leaders meet this week in Évian-les-Bains, France. The summit brings together the leaders of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, the United States, and representatives of the European Union to discuss some of the world's most pressing challenges, including Ukraine, economic stability, artificial intelligence, global security, and international development. From Economic Crisis to Global Leadership Forum The G7 traces its origins to 1975, when leaders from six industrialized democracies met in Rambouillet, France, amid economic turmoil following the 1973 oil crisis. The gathering was designed to create an informal forum where leaders could have candid discussions about economic recovery, inflation, energy security, and trade. Canada joined the following year, creating what became known as the G7. Unlike formal international organizations, the G7 has no permanent headquarters or treaty structure. Its influence comes from the economic and political weight of its members and the ability of leaders to coordinate policy responses to global challenges. Major Milestones in G7 History 1975 – Rambouillet, France The first summit established a new model for direct dialogue among world leaders during a period of economic uncertainty. 1980s – Managing Economic Volatility Summits focused heavily on inflation, energy security, trade liberalization, and coordination among major economies as globalization accelerated. 1998 – Expansion to the G8 Russia joined the group, transforming it into the G8 and reflecting hopes for greater post-Cold War cooperation. 2002 – Kananaskis, Canada Following the September 11 attacks, security and counterterrorism became central themes. The summit also launched major international development initiatives. 2014 – Return to the G7 Russia was suspended following its annexation of Crimea, and the forum returned to its current G7 structure. 2023 – Hiroshima, Japan Leaders met in the world's first city devastated by an atomic bomb, reinforcing commitments to peace, international security, and nuclear non-proliferation. 2025 – Kananaskis, Canada The summit marked the 50th anniversary of the first G7 gathering and focused on energy security, digital transformation, emerging technologies, and strengthening international partnerships. Why the G7 Still Matters While the global economy has evolved dramatically since 1975, the G7 remains a critical venue for coordination among advanced democracies. The agenda has expanded far beyond economics to include climate policy, international security, public health, emerging technologies, cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, and responses to international conflicts. This year's summit in France reflects that evolution. Alongside discussions on Ukraine and global economic imbalances, leaders are expected to focus on the opportunities and risks presented by AI, debt challenges facing developing nations, and growing geopolitical tensions around the world. Connect With An Expert Journalists covering the 2026 G7 Summit, international relations, global governance, economic diplomacy, trade policy, international security, or the evolving role of multilateral institutions can connect with experts from your institution through ExpertFile. Whether examining the summit's historical significance or its impact on today's geopolitical landscape, expert insight can help provide context behind the headlines. Visit all of our experts at www.expertfile.com

Announcing Major AIQ Enhancements to Improve Inquiry Quality, Relevance and Routing featured image

5 min

Announcing Major AIQ Enhancements to Improve Inquiry Quality, Relevance and Routing

ExpertFile is announcing major enhancements to AIQ Intelligent Inquiry Qualification, our AI-powered inquiry management feature that helps organizations evaluate, prioritize and route inbound requests from journalists, event organizers, prospective customers, donors, prospective students, research partners, policymakers and other key audiences. These enhancements significantly expand AIQ well beyond its original quarantine capabilities, helping organizations do more than filter unwanted messages. We've designed the new AIQ to provides a more intelligent way to understand the intent behind each inquiry, assess its relevance and ensure valuable opportunities are routed to the right person or team. “We are helping organizations better understand the intent behind each request, protect expert time and ensure valuable opportunities are recognized, prioritized and routed to the right people. Robert Carter - Co-Founder & VP Product Our experience has shown us that as organizations invest more in making their experts, research and knowledge more discoverable across websites, search engines and AI-driven channels, inbound inquiry volume continues to grow. That visibility creates real opportunity, but it also brings more noise from unwanted or unaligned inquiries. While some inquiries are highly valuable. Others are vague, promotional, misdirected, abusive or unrelated to the organization’s expertise. And too often, all of these messages arrive through the same expert-facing channels. We've learned that without a smarter intake layer, important opportunities can be delayed, misrouted or missed entirely. That is the problem these AIQ enhancements are designed to solve. A Shift from Strictly Quarantine to Quality AIQ was first developed to help organizations protect experts from unwanted, irrelevant or inappropriate inquiries. That remains important, and does a great job, but the challenge has grown. Today, organizations need more than a filter. They need a way to evaluate inquiry quality, understand intent and route legitimate opportunities with greater confidence. These latest AIQ enhancements move the feature from a quarantine-focused workflow to a more complete inquiry qualification system. AIQ now evaluates the full context of each inquiry, including the message content, tone, specificity, intent and alignment with accepted inquiry types. The goal is not simply to determine whether a message should be blocked. The goal is to understand whether it represents a legitimate opportunity and where it should go. For organizations that simply display and expert's email this is a level of judgment traditional email spam filters are not designed to provide. While Spam filters can help identify suspicious or malicious messages. They cannot reliably determine whether a journalist submitted through the wrong form, whether a donor inquiry should be routed to advancement, whether a prospective partner is describing a real opportunity, or whether a request aligns with the organization’s expertise and workflow. AIQ is designed for that more nuanced work. Here is a Breakdown of What’s New in AIQ Two significant enhancements are now part of the new AIQ workflow: Inquiry Relevance Evaluation assesses whether a message meets the professional standards of the organization’s inquiry workflow. It helps distinguish meaningful requests from those that are vague, promotional, abusive, unrelated or outside the scope of the organization’s expertise. Inquiry Type Evaluation reviews the actual content of the message, independent of the category selected by the sender. This is important because people often choose the wrong form option. A journalist may submit through a general inquiry form. A donor may select the wrong category. A prospective partner may describe an opportunity that should be routed somewhere else. AIQ helps recognize the true nature of the request so it can be reclassified and directed appropriately. Together, these enhancements help organizations identify valuable inquiries more accurately, reduce unnecessary manual triage and protect expert time. Why This Matters High-value inquiries often do not arrive perfectly packaged. A media opportunity may look like a general question. A speaking request may come through the wrong channel. A customer or partner inquiry may be sent to media relations when it is really a business development opportunity. When these requests are misdirected, they can sit in the wrong inbox, create extra work for staff or disappear entirely. AIQ helps close that gap. “AIQ is not just about blocking bad messages,” said Robert Carter, Co-Founder & VP Product at ExpertFile. “We are helping organizations better understand the intent behind each request, protect expert time and ensure valuable opportunities are recognized, prioritized and routed to the right people. A misdirected inquiry can represent a media opportunity, speaking engagement, partnership or business opportunity that an organization cannot afford to miss.” For communications, marketing, advancement, research, enrollment and administrative teams, this creates a smarter front door for inbound demand. Fully Deployed and Operating at Scale The latest AIQ enhancements are now fully deployed across the ExpertFile platform. They are not beta features or future roadmap items. AIQ is actively processing inquiries today and has achieved a 99.9% success rate in accurately evaluating and routing inbound requests. “We spent considerable time stress-testing this before full deployment,” said Dan Stanhope, Head of Software Development at ExpertFile. “The goal was never just to block bad messages — it was to make sure legitimate, high-value inquiries couldn’t slip through unrecognized. When you combine deep semantic analysis with a trained human review layer, you get a level of accuracy that no standalone spam filter can come close to matching.” Helping Organizations Capture More Value From Expert Discovery Expert discovery does not end when someone finds an expert profile, research page or Expert Center. The next step is making sure the right inquiry reaches the right person. That is where AIQ plays an important role. By expanding AIQ’s ability to qualify, classify and route inbound requests, ExpertFile helps organizations move from visibility to action. AIQ helps ensure that legitimate opportunities are recognized, prioritized and routed efficiently, while low-quality or irrelevant messages are filtered out of the process. For universities, healthcare systems, corporations and associations, this means less noise, better routing and more confidence that valuable opportunities are not being missed. The enhanced AIQ feature is available now as part of the ExpertFile platform. Read the full announcement here: https://exprt.co/AIQ Already a customer...talk to your dedicated Customer Success Team member who can tell you more about this great feature.  Looking to implement something like this for your organization.  Learn more about ExpertFile at expertfile.com/getstarted and request a demo or FREE trial.

View all posts