Fighting Red Tape To Win The Media Relations Speed Game

Dec 10, 2019

4 min

Peter Evans

It’s a situation that happens every day in the media relations world.


A reporter calls and they need someone for an interview fast.


This is how the scenario should play out:


Step 1 - The media calls a communications officer with a simple request for information and an interview on a recently announced program.


Step 2 – The communication officer identifies a suitable spokesperson.


Step 3 – The reporter and spokesperson talk, arrange an interview -- and there is some excellent earned media and exposure for your institution.


It sounds simple enough.


But, not so fast.


In reality, things often fall apart on step 3 and the process turns into something that borderlines on a Monty Python skit.


Based on my experience and others I’ve consulted with – it often plays out something like this:


The communications officer contacts the suitable spokesperson’s Manager to ensure it is okay they can speak to the expertise and subject matter they specialize in. Then, they have to loop in that manager with a Director and CEO to inform them of the media request and the plan. And then if the Director agrees, the CEO gets on board. Or perhaps the Director agrees only after checking with the CEO and agreeing to the spokesperson.


Once that’s nailed down somehow…the CEO wonders if speaking points are required and will only proceed once the Manager and Director have signed off on them.


After the speaking points are finally approved, speaking points and the media request are sent to the identified spokesperson.


Then the communications officer (remember him or her?) responds to the media that they have found an expert and will arrange a time for interview. The communications officer has the Manager, Director, CEO and spokesperson each sign off on paper-generated Media Request Form for filing and safe records keeping.


And, then…..finally……if the media hasn’t already gone elsewhere, the reporter and the spokesperson finally speak – about 18 steps later. It’s actually more steps than it takes to assemble my daughter’s bike or the average IKEA nightstand. It’s cumbersome, ineffective and costs the organization a lot of time in person power for something that doesn’t need to be this difficult.


And the reality is … this spokesperson is a paid professional with a Master’s degree who was hired for the subject matter they specialize in. The media request was related to a media release issued by the organization. With a simple approval process and a pro-active approach to media, this could have been easier for everybody with an immediate turnaround and a positive outcome.


Think this is a joke? It’s not. In fact, there’s a Communications Officer’s support group that meets every Thursday to share similar situations (I’m being cheeky).


Media will appreciate that sensitive issues take time to respond to. In fact, a lot of media relish the thought the there are people scrambling to answer the tough questions.


What drives media crazy is having to wait hours for what should be a simple, safe and low-risk reply. They likely already know the answer, they just need the expertise to lend it credibility and verification.


(Photo courtesy: CBS Television Studios)

So does your Communications Process need an institutional intervention?

When you make it hard for media to get easy answers, they might start looking elsewhere. Odds are they will. Consider this:


Do you have a grading system for media requests?


  • Low-risk asks can be seen coming and responses pre-approved or left in the hands of your very competent staff.
  • High risk asks mean approval and oversight. People will get that. As well, it will lend a tone of seriousness to the situation.


Do you know the reporter or media outlet?


  • A strong relationship needs faith on both sides.
  • Known reporters and news outlets survive on reputation. Expect them to be professional and trust that they’ll get it right.


Trust your Communications Team – Don’t Micro Manage


  • Media relations isn’t a science – it’s an art where experience matters most.
  • Communications Officers likely know the media and most come from a media background.
  • They’ll know the angles, they scan the media and can likely predict the questions.
  • Empower them to save you time and rely on their instincts.
  • Too many Communications Officers ask “Why did you hire me?” when they aren’t trusted on the simplest of things.


Most institutions have a rigorous vetting process – so why the worry?


  • Didn’t you hire these people – rely on your staff and let them be accountable.
  • Fewer steps saves time, reduces confusion and meets the need of a low-risk ask.
  • Less micromanaging = more trust. Morale is a big deal in any workplace.


So when the media calls, here’s my advice. Take a deep breath. Assess the risk. And arrange the interview as soon as possible and with as little maintenance and anxiety as possible.


The media get the information they want, your institution gets the earned media and free exposure it wants and your Communications Team maintains a reputation as a group that can deliver content on deadline and ‘gets’ the information game.


Remember – in today’s media – it’s all about speed.


The easier you make it for media, the more the phone will ring.



Connect with:
Peter Evans

Peter Evans

Co-Founder & CEO

Recognized speaker on expertise marketing, technology and innovation

Media TrendsThought LeadershipMarketingTechnologyInnovation
Powered by

You might also like...

Check out some other posts from ExpertFile

2 min

Why Greenland Matters: The History and Strategic Importance of the World’s Largest Island

Often viewed as remote and sparsely populated, Greenland has long played an outsized role in global strategy. Settled by Inuit peoples for thousands of years, Greenland later became part of the Danish realm in the 18th century and today exists as an autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark. Its location—bridging North America and Europe—has consistently drawn the attention of major powers, especially during moments of geopolitical tension. That attention intensified during the Cold War, when Greenland became a critical asset in Arctic defense. The United States established military installations on the island, most notably what is now known as Pituffik Space Base, to support missile warning systems and transatlantic defense. Greenland’s position along the shortest air and missile routes between North America and Russia made it indispensable to early-warning networks—and that strategic logic has not faded with time. Today, Greenland’s importance is growing rather than shrinking. Climate change is reshaping the Arctic, opening new shipping routes and increasing access to natural resources such as rare earth minerals, hydrocarbons, and freshwater reserves locked in ice. These developments have renewed global interest in Greenland from NATO allies and rival powers alike, as control over Arctic infrastructure, data, and mobility becomes central to economic and security planning. At the same time, Greenland’s own political future—balancing autonomy, Indigenous priorities, and external pressure—adds another layer of complexity. Greenland’s story is ultimately one of geography shaping history. What once made the island strategically valuable for defense now places it at the center of debates about climate, security, energy, and sovereignty in the 21st century. As Arctic competition accelerates, Greenland is no longer a peripheral actor—it is a focal point where global interests converge. Journalists covering geopolitics, Arctic security, climate change, Indigenous governance, or global resource competition are encouraged to connect with experts who study Greenland’s past and its evolving strategic role. Expert insight can help explain why this vast island continues to matter—and why it is likely to play an even larger role in the years ahead. Our experts can help! Connect with more experts here: www.expertfile.com

2 min

Power, Politics, and Petroleum: The Story of Venezuela

After gaining independence from Spain in the early 19th century under the leadership of Simón Bolívar, the country spent much of the next century marked by political instability and military rule. Everything changed in the early 20th century with the discovery of vast oil reserves, which rapidly transformed Venezuela into one of the world’s leading petroleum exporters and shifted power toward a centralized state funded almost entirely by oil revenue. By the mid-20th century, oil had become both Venezuela’s greatest asset and its greatest vulnerability. Democratic governments that emerged after 1958 used oil income to expand social programs and infrastructure, but also built an economy dangerously dependent on a single commodity. When oil prices fell in the 1980s and 1990s, economic inequality and public frustration surged, creating the conditions that brought Hugo Chávez to power in 1999. Chávez reoriented the political system around a state-controlled oil sector, using petroleum revenues to fund social initiatives while consolidating political authority and weakening independent institutions. Under Chávez and his successor Nicolás Maduro, oil remained the backbone of the state—but declining production, corruption, and mismanagement hollowed out the industry itself. As oil revenues collapsed, so did public services, democratic norms, and economic stability. Venezuela’s history illustrates a central paradox: immense natural wealth paired with fragile governance. Control of oil has repeatedly shaped political power, domestic policy, and Venezuela’s relationship with the world—making energy inseparable from the country’s political story. Journalists covering Venezuela, Latin American politics, energy markets, or resource-driven economies are encouraged to connect with experts who can provide historical context, explain the role of oil in shaping political outcomes, and assess how Venezuela’s past continues to influence its uncertain future. Our experts can help! Connect with more experts here: www.expertfile.com

1 min

Covering Venezuela? We Can Help.

The situation in Venezuela is fluid, and new details about the operation, its planning and execution, the future of the country and how the world is reacting is all happening in real time. Journalists covering Latin America, global politics, migration, energy, or human rights are encouraged to connect with experts who can provide context on Venezuela’s evolving political landscape, economic indicators, humanitarian conditions, and regional implications. Expert insight is critical for moving beyond headlines and understanding what the next phase of Venezuela’s crisis could mean—for its people and for the region. Looking for an expert to help? Connect with our experts: www.expertfile.com

View all posts