Media Training Can You Afford NOT to Be Prepared When Reporters Come Calling?

Dec 10, 2019

7 min

Peter Evans


Want to see someone in a respected position of power throw away a career in all of about two minutes? Stephen Duckett was an expert in his field. Respected globally. Until this…


Watch this exchange



Duckett wasn’t prepared to deal with media. He paid a serious professional price and left a lesson for us all to learn from. In fact, his exchange is used by a lot of media trainers on exactly what not to do in a  crisis situation.


As a former news producer, I remember scrambling to find an expert opinion or perspective when news was breaking. If a story required explanation and when it was beyond the grasp of even the brightest of reporters we needed the help of supporting sources.  They were critical in helping explain, validate, and ideally, break down just what was going on to our audiences at home.


When an outbreak struck, we needed an epidemiologist. When a rare earthquake shook the region, the search for a seismologist was on.


Finding the expert wasn’t usually the problem. We had local universities, colleges, and health care facilities within arm’s reach.


However, finding an expert who could effectively speak on camera often was. Our goal was to keep people from turning the channel – so boring, highly technical speaking experts simply wouldn’t do it for us.


When I worked in TV, we needed someone who could explain a complex subject, in layman’s terms, and in sound bites of about 15 seconds. It may not seem like much, but it is a lot to ask. Explaining high level content is not easy, but the reality is that your audience needs complex subjects explained in the simplest of ways. To do this right, it requires understanding the roles and goals of media and media training.


Anyone who will be representing an organization, institution, or corporation needs some form of coaching. It’s a must-have requirement for most CEOs and politicians. Turn on your news at just about any hour of the day, and you can easily tell who has been properly prepared and trained and who hasn’t. It doesn’t happen organically. It takes work. It takes expert coaching.


Media-friendly speakers bolster credibility and get noticed. In times of a crisis, a trained speaker may be the missing piece that can make or break a situation a reputation.


Those who are not trained stick out—in a very bad way. They stammer, evade questions, ramble and are usually incoherent. If the task is mainly to describe a current situation, an untrained expert may ramble or speak hundreds of feet over the head of the average person. If there’s a crisis at hand—a tragedy, a scandal, a lawsuit or worse—an untrained speaker risks making a bad situation worse.


Take a look back to July of 2013—an out-of-control train carrying crude oil exploded, destroying the downtown section of Lac Megantic, in Quebec, Canada. Thirty buildings were leveled, killing 47 people. In this small town, everybody knew somebody who was killed.


Edward Burkhardt, president of Montreal, Maine & Atlantic Railway Inc. arrived shortly after the explosion. He was the near-perfect storm—an untrained, and likely uncoachable leader. He was clearly in distress, rattled, arrogant, and unprepared. He fixed blame at the worst possible time, blaming the train’s engineer and the local fire department.


A journalist asked how much he was worth. A town is destroyed, the world is watching, close to four dozen people are dead, and his reply was, “I’m worth a lot less now than I was last week.”


Proper media training and coaching would not have prevented the horrible tragedy, but knowing how to speak during such a high-stress situation and knowing what questions to expect might have mitigated the visceral reaction of residents, industry and government officials.


As it stands, Edward Burkhardt and the company, no matter how successful either had been in the past, are now forever associated with that interview.


Conway Fraser worked for the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation for almost 20 years. He’s a Gemini award-winning journalist who worked as a national reporter and investigative journalist. These days, he specializes in strategic and crisis communications as well as media coaching. Conway’s worked with some of Canada’s top corporate executives, academic leaders, and politicians.



In both journalism and in PR, he has seen executives who have spent decades building a reputation only to have it destroyed in moments because they weren’t prepared to deal with the media. They’ve either never received media coaching or, Conway says, have taken mandatory training but were never further invested in. In other words, he says, they thought they didn’t need media training and were only taking it to appease the Board or ownership.


“Proper media coaching isn’t just about knowing how to spew a main message, use effective body language or bridge away from challenging questions,” Conway says, “In my sessions I also teach my clients about the media, what their job is like, what a day is like for a reporter, what they need from you and how to respect their role. If anyone doubts the value of that, they’re playing with fire. Ask Stephen Duckett.”


Natalie Duddridge is a reporter for NY1. I worked with Natalie years ago in Canada at the start of her career. Natalie’s talent as a journalist has taken her to Ottawa (Canada’s capital), Toronto, and most recently, New York.


New York sits at the top (sorry L.A.) of media markets in the United States. It has a huge audience of about 10 million people and it is hands down the most competitive media game on the continent.



Reporters in these markets never get to rest. They’re either chasing stories, or when they are covering a story they had better have an angle, source, or expert that the others do not. And when you are in a race with at least six other news outlets, standing out isn’t easy.


Finding experts and having them ‘camera’ or ‘microphone’ ready is a must.


As Natalie explained to me, getting an expert for a story is absolutely crucial. In a market as diverse as New York City, those experts can range from police to politicians, to health and education officials, to scientists and artists.


Natalie also lent some great perspective on just how a reporter puts together a story and how your expert needs to know that news is also about storytelling and not just details.



“Last week I did a story about the heroin epidemic plaguing the Borough of Staten Island,” Natalie explained. “We like to begin our stories with a human element, in this case a recovering drug addict. In addition to his personal opinions and insight about how to prevent and slow the opioid crisis in the region, we also reached out to the local Drug Rehabilitation Center and interviewed a doctor as well as a therapist. We also interviewed the Staten Island District Attorney about the work he’s doing with New York State Governor to get more dollars for a drug task force to do everything from put more money into preventative education, build rehab centers, add police, fund additional assistant district attorneys to process criminal cases.”


If you were counting, you can see she spoke with three key experts on the subject of the story. Each was essential in the reporting process.


“For this story we featured several different experts on varying opinions on how this current drug crisis should be dealt with. All of the facts, stats and data for this story were based on the officials and experts we contacted.”


Being prepared and knowing what the reporter wants are also ideal elements in conveying the right message. For TV, short, smart, and to-the-point responses work best.


“We need a 10 to 15 second sound bite that is ideally informative and clear, and in some cases entertaining,” Duddridge told me. “When I am making calls to experts, I essentially do a pre-interview over the phone to hear how clearly they can explain a topic. If they are great at breaking down studies and terms into focused ideas that are concise and fit into a two-minute story, our job as reporters is so much easier.”


A win/win scenario. Your message is delivered, your institution and experts are promoted and the reporter files a great story.


It all seems simple.


But it’s not.


It takes training and preparation. If you are going to offer up your experts for an interview, they need to be ready.


Media training takes time, it costs money – but it’s an investment in your staff and your institution. As we learned from the example above, not knowing how to answer, interact, and respond to media can be devastating. Performing under pressure only succeeds with practice and training.


If your experts are media trained the reward will always outweigh the risk.



Here are a few tips:


Get media trained – Use a professional media coach. It costs money, but the professional development, readiness, comfort, and ability to deliver will pay off ten-fold.


Media-friendly experts get noticed – When your expert is on the news, people see them. They are representing your institution, so think about what this means for your credibility and recruiting potential.


You never get a second chance at a first impression – An old, clichéd saying, but it’s true. A weak speaker who comes across poorly imprints a negative impression on viewers, peers and your institution as a whole. It’s amateur hour, and it doesn’t need to be.


Friends for life – Once you prove yourself as a worthy and media-friendly source, the media will keep coming back. Experts who can provide journalists with the information, perspective, and sound bites they need are not only appreciated but noticed and remembered by all media. Once you have established yourself as a reliable source, expect the reporters to come calling time and time again.


Dividends – Every story where your expert looks good is positive earned media. Getting on NBC, CBS, FOX or any other nightly newscast is a huge win for your Communications Department. It’s exposure, promotion, and advertising—and it’s free.  


Connect with:
Peter Evans

Peter Evans

Co-Founder & CEO

Recognized speaker on expertise marketing, technology and innovation

Media TrendsThought LeadershipMarketingTechnologyInnovation
Powered by

You might also like...

Check out some other posts from ExpertFile

ExpertSpotlight: Ebola: What It Is, How It Spreads, and Whether the Public Should Be Concerned featured image

3 min

ExpertSpotlight: Ebola: What It Is, How It Spreads, and Whether the Public Should Be Concerned

Few diseases in modern history have generated the level of fear associated with Ebola. With graphic symptoms, high mortality rates, and images of overwhelmed treatment centres etched into public memory, Ebola became synonymous with the dangers of global outbreaks long before COVID-19 reshaped how the world thinks about pandemics. But what exactly is Ebola? Where did it come from? How dangerous is it today? And should the public still be worried? A Deadly Virus with a Modern Legacy Ebola virus disease was first identified in 1976 during simultaneous outbreaks in what is now the Democratic Republic of the Congo and South Sudan. The virus was named after the nearby Ebola River, and from the beginning it proved exceptionally dangerous, capable of causing severe hemorrhagic fever with fatality rates that have ranged from 25 to 90 percent depending on the outbreak and available medical care. For decades, Ebola outbreaks were typically isolated to remote regions of Central and West Africa. That changed dramatically in 2014 when the largest Ebola outbreak in recorded history spread through Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone, infecting more than 28,000 people and killing over 11,000. The crisis exposed major weaknesses in global health preparedness and demonstrated how quickly infectious diseases can overwhelm healthcare systems and destabilize economies and communities. The outbreak also fundamentally changed international public health policy. Governments, hospitals, and health organizations around the world began investing more heavily in infectious disease surveillance, emergency response planning, quarantine procedures, and vaccine development. What Ebola Actually Does to the Body Ebola begins much like many common viral illnesses, which can make early detection difficult. Initial symptoms often include: Sudden fever Severe fatigue Muscle pain Headache Sore throat As the disease progresses, patients may develop: Vomiting and diarrhea Rash Liver and kidney impairment Internal and external bleeding Multi-organ failure The virus attacks the immune system and damages blood vessels and organs, often leading to shock and death in severe cases. Patients who survive can still face long-term complications including joint pain, neurological problems, eye disorders, and ongoing fatigue months or even years later. How Ebola Spreads -  And How It Does Not One of the most important public health facts about Ebola is that it does not spread through the air like influenza or COVID-19. Transmission occurs through direct contact with: Blood or bodily fluids of infected individuals Contaminated needles or medical equipment Infected animals Surfaces contaminated with infectious fluids This means Ebola is highly contagious in healthcare settings and among close family caregivers without proper protective equipment, but far less transmissible in casual public settings than many people assume. Funeral practices involving direct contact with deceased individuals have also historically contributed to outbreaks in some regions, making culturally sensitive public health education critically important during containment efforts. Treatments and Vaccines Have Changed the Outlook For years, Ebola was viewed almost as a death sentence. That perception has begun to change. Major advances in medicine and outbreak response have significantly improved survival rates, including: Rapid testing and surveillance systems Specialized isolation units Improved supportive care and hydration Monoclonal antibody treatments Effective vaccines for certain Ebola strains The development of the rVSV-ZEBOV vaccine represented a major breakthrough and has helped contain several recent outbreaks before they expanded into international crises. Global health organizations are now far better equipped to identify and isolate cases quickly compared to the early years of Ebola response. Should the Public Be Worried? Ebola remains a serious and deadly disease, but experts generally emphasize that widespread public panic is not warranted. Most outbreaks remain geographically limited and are aggressively monitored by national governments, the World Health Organization, and international health agencies. Countries with advanced healthcare systems also have far stronger infection prevention and containment capabilities than existed during earlier outbreaks. Still, Ebola continues to command attention because it highlights how interconnected global health has become. International travel, fragile healthcare systems, political instability, climate pressures, and human interaction with wildlife all increase the risk of future outbreaks of emerging infectious diseases. In many ways, Ebola serves as both a warning and a lesson: deadly viruses can emerge unexpectedly, but rapid science, coordinated public health measures, and global cooperation can dramatically reduce their impact. The world’s experience with Ebola helped shape many of the outbreak response systems now used to confront emerging diseases today, and public health experts continue to view it as one of the clearest examples of why pandemic preparedness remains essential. Connect with an expert:

ExpertSpotlight: From Revolution to Ritual: The Enduring Power of May Day Parades in Russia featured image

2 min

ExpertSpotlight: From Revolution to Ritual: The Enduring Power of May Day Parades in Russia

Each year on May 1, images of grand parades, waving flags, and tightly choreographed displays evoke a powerful legacy rooted in ideology, identity, and statecraft. In Russia, May Day—known as International Workers’ Day—has evolved from a revolutionary rallying point into a symbolic expression of national unity, political messaging, and historical continuity. Origins in Revolution and Worker Solidarity May Day celebrations in Russia trace their roots to the late 19th century, inspired by international labour movements advocating for workers’ rights—particularly the push for the eight-hour workday. Following the Russian Revolution, the holiday was institutionalized by the Bolsheviks as a cornerstone of socialist identity. Under leaders like Vladimir Lenin, May 1 became more than a labour holiday—it was a stage for demonstrating the strength and unity of the working class under communist rule. Early celebrations blended grassroots enthusiasm with emerging state control, reinforcing the ideological foundations of the new Soviet state. The Soviet Spectacle: Power on Display During the era of the Soviet Union, May Day parades transformed into highly orchestrated spectacles. Held prominently in Red Square, these events showcased military hardware, industrial achievements, and mass participation from workers, students, and state organizations. Under Joseph Stalin, the parades took on an increasingly propagandistic tone, emphasizing Soviet strength both domestically and to the outside world. Precision choreography, symbolic imagery, and sheer scale reinforced narratives of unity, productivity, and ideological superiority during the Cold War. Post-Soviet Transition: From Ideology to Identity Following the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, the meaning of May Day in Russia shifted significantly. While it remains a public holiday, its overt ideological messaging has softened. Today, events often blend labour advocacy, political expression, and seasonal celebration. Modern observances frequently include rallies organized by trade unions such as the Federation of Independent Trade Unions of Russia, alongside state-supported demonstrations that emphasize national unity and economic stability under leaders like Vladimir Putin. Why May Day Still Matters May Day parades in Russia continue to serve as a barometer of the country’s political and social climate. While the overt revolutionary fervor of the early 20th century has faded, the event remains deeply symbolic: Historical Continuity: A living link to the Soviet past and its defining narratives Political Messaging: A platform for governments to project stability and cohesion Labour Identity: An enduring reminder of workers’ rights and collective action Cultural Tradition: A widely recognized public celebration marking the arrival of spring Expert Insight What makes May Day in Russia particularly compelling is its adaptability. Across more than a century, it has shifted from protest to propaganda to public ritual, each iteration reflecting the priorities of the state and the sentiments of its people. Connect with more experts here: www.expertfile.com

ExpertSpotlight: No Joke: The Curious Origins and Enduring Traditions of April Fools’ Day featured image

2 min

ExpertSpotlight: No Joke: The Curious Origins and Enduring Traditions of April Fools’ Day

Every April 1, the world collectively loosens up. Friends prank friends, brands try to outdo each other with outrageous announcements, and even the most serious newsrooms occasionally get in on the joke. But behind the laughter and “gotcha” moments, the origins of April Fools’ Day are anything but straightforward - and that’s part of what makes it so fascinating. One of the most widely accepted origin stories dates back to 1582 and the Gregorian calendar reform. When France shifted New Year’s celebrations from late March (around April 1) to January 1, not everyone got the memo, or chose to follow it. Those who continued celebrating in spring became the subject of ridicule, often tricked with fake gifts or sent on pointless errands. They were dubbed “April fools,” a label that stuck. Other theories reach even further back, connecting the day to ancient seasonal festivals like Hilaria, where people donned disguises, mocked authority, and celebrated the unpredictable shift into spring. Across cultures, the common thread is clear: a moment in the calendar where normal rules are bent, and mischief is not just accepted - it’s expected. What started as localized traditions has evolved into a global cultural phenomenon. Media outlets, corporations, and public figures now participate in April Fools’ Day with increasingly elaborate hoaxes. Perhaps the most famous example came from the BBC in 1957, when it aired a segment about Swiss farmers harvesting spaghetti from trees, complete with convincing visuals. Viewers were fooled, and a legendary prank was born. Today, in an era of viral content and misinformation, April Fools’ Day walks a fine line between humor and credibility, forcing audiences to question what they see and hear. Beyond the pranks, the day reveals something deeper about human nature. It’s a rare, socially sanctioned opportunity to challenge authority, play with truth, and share in collective amusement. For journalists, it also offers a unique angle: how stories spread, why people believe them, and what it says about trust in media. In a world often dominated by serious headlines, April Fools’ Day reminds us that sometimes, the most powerful connection comes not from facts alone, but from the shared experience of being delightfully fooled. Our experts can help! Connect with more experts here: www.expertfile.com

View all posts