The Markets never lie – and it looks like Wall Street is smiling about Joe Biden

Mar 4, 2020

1 min

Jeff Haymond, Ph.D.

The Markets never lie – and it looks like Wall Street is smiling about Joe Biden

 

It wasn’t just the Joe Biden campaign celebrating after a monumental Super Tuesday – so too was Wall Street.

 

Dow (INDU) futures were last up more than 580 points, or 2.3%, after the former US vice president was projected to win many as nine states including Texas, Virginia and Minnesota. Sanders captured Utah, Vermont and Colorado, and was leading in California.

Futures for the S&P 500 (INX) were up 1.8%, while the Nasdaq Composite (COMP) increased 1.9%.


Wall Street has been unnerved by prospect that Sanders, who wants to ban fracking, break up big banks and institute a wealth tax, could win the Democratic nomination and eventually the presidency. March 04 – CNN Business



 

But what impact and influence will investors and indexes have on the actual outcome of the primaries? Will voters be convinced or swayed by the markets or is this result simply a by-product of an election result?

 

It is interesting for sure, and if you are a reporter covering this topic – then let our experts help with your coverage.

 

Jeff Haymond, Ph.D. is Dean, School of Business Administration and a Professor of Economics at Cedarville and is an expert in finance and trade. Dr. Haymond is available to speak with media regarding this topic – simply click on his icon to arrange an interview.




Connect with:
Jeff Haymond, Ph.D.

Jeff Haymond, Ph.D.

Dean, School of Business Administration/Associate Professor

Research interests include economics and religion, as well as monetary theory

Financial Markets (General)Federal Trade Reserve PolicyFree TradeMinimum Wage / UnemploymentGovernment Regulation
Powered by

You might also like...

Check out some other posts from Cedarville University

Reported Iranian Threats Prompt U.S. Embassy Precautions featured image

1 min

Reported Iranian Threats Prompt U.S. Embassy Precautions

Reported threats against American personnel are prompting new precautions at U.S. diplomatic posts in the Middle East. The State Department is reducing staffing at embassies in Jordan, Lebanon, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates following intelligence warnings about increased Iranian efforts to target Americans. The embassies remain open under restricted operations, and the staffing changes differ from the ordered departure of nonessential personnel and families from Saudi Arabia. The precautions underscore the challenges of maintaining a diplomatic presence during a regional conflict. Embassies support communication with foreign governments, assist American citizens and provide information that helps guide U.S. policy. Reducing staff can limit personnel’s exposure to danger, but it also requires officials to reassess which activities can safely continue. Reported threats involving Iran-backed Houthi militants add another layer of complexity to those security decisions. The developments also raise questions about how Washington can protect its personnel while preserving channels for negotiation. U.S. officials have denied that the staffing reductions are connected to potential new American and Israeli strikes against Iran. The precautions nevertheless illustrate how intelligence warnings can affect diplomatic operations before an attack occurs—and how regional tensions can place Americans serving abroad at risk. 

Federal Reserve Decision Puts Borrowing Costs and Inflation in Focus featured image

1 min

Federal Reserve Decision Puts Borrowing Costs and Inflation in Focus

The Federal Reserve’s October 27–28 meeting comes as Americans continue to face persistent inflation and costly borrowing. Policymakers are widely expected to leave the benchmark interest rate unchanged when they announce their decision Wednesday, October 28. However, an anticipated pause does not settle the question of whether further increases will be needed. Investors and businesses will closely watch the Fed’s explanation for clues about its next steps. The decision reflects a difficult balance. Higher interest rates can help restrain inflation by discouraging borrowing and spending, but they can also slow business expansion, reduce hiring and make major purchases harder to afford. Keeping rates elevated gives those effects more time to work through the economy. Raising them further could add pressure if households and employers are already becoming more cautious. For consumers, the implications reach beyond financial markets. Credit card balances, auto financing and business loans can remain expensive when borrowing costs stay high. Mortgage rates also respond to broader market expectations about inflation and future policy. This week’s announcement will therefore matter both for the immediate rate decision and for what it suggests about the path toward more affordable credit. 

Inflation Puts Household Budgets—and Candidates—Under Pressure featured image

1 min

Inflation Puts Household Budgets—and Candidates—Under Pressure

Inflation is keeping affordability at the center of American life as voters prepare for the November 3 midterm elections. Consumer prices rose 3.7% over the year ending in September, with gasoline and other everyday expenses adding pressure to household budgets. For families already adjusting their spending, persistent price increases can mean difficult decisions about groceries, transportation and discretionary purchases. Those pressures also create political challenges. President Donald Trump and Republican candidates are defending their economic record, while Democrats argue that the administration’s policies have made everyday life more expensive. Tariffs and energy disruptions associated with the Iran conflict have become central points of debate. Although growth and employment remain important measures of economic performance, voters often judge the economy through the expenses they encounter most frequently. The debate highlights a distinction that can become lost in campaign messaging: slowing inflation means prices are rising more slowly, rather than returning to earlier levels. Families may continue feeling financial strain even when economic indicators improve. As candidates offer competing solutions, the larger question is which policies can improve purchasing power while supporting employment and economic stability. The election will test how strongly Americans connect those daily financial pressures to the leaders seeking their votes. 

View all posts