Featured Post from University of Connecticut

Disney, DeSantis, and Corporate Dilemmas

Apr 26, 2022

2 min

Robert Bird

The Florida state legislature recently voted to end the Walt Disney Co.’s special tax district, which has permitted the Orlando amusement park to govern its land and save millions each year in taxes.



The decision followed a clash between Disney executives and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis over recent legislation that prohibits instruction on sexual orientation or gender identity for children in kindergarten through Grade 3.


UConn's Professor Robert Bird, the Eversource Energy Chair in Business Ethics and past president of the Academy of Legal Studies in Business, sat down with UConn Today to talk about clash between the corporation and Florida government as well as the implications for other companies that may be facing similar moral and ethical dilemmas:


Q: There are so many layers to this story, from taxation to self-governance, political power to human rights. What strikes you as most significant?

From one perspective, this is a debate over the role of LGBTQ+ education in schools. From another perspective, this raises the broader issue of the implications of private companies speaking and acting on matters of public policy.

Corporations can no longer remain neutral or silent on major issues facing American society. Consumers, employees, shareholders, and the public are increasingly expecting companies to take a stand on controversies that matter to them. Just as some companies are being punished for not severing their relationships with Russia, because of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, so are companies like Disney expected to speak out against public policies that contradict the values of its stakeholders.

Q: Why does Disney play an important role in this issue?

Disney is an important participant in the underlying “Don’t Say Gay” dispute. Disney has a powerful public brand and takes care to cultivate a family-friendly image worldwide. Disney has also been a long-standing leader in supporting LGBTQ+ rights. Disney has provided health benefits to same-sex partners since 1995, and allowed “Gay Days” at Walt Disney World since 1991. Public opinion was more hostile toward LGBTQ+ rights then, and Disney stood by its values even with the ensuing controversy. For Disney to “stand down” when so many people were advocating for Disney’s support in opposition to the bill, would have eroded its long-standing support of gay rights generally.

Q: What message does this send to other CEOs who might be caught in a moral, ethical, or environmental debate with government leaders?

The message sent to other companies is that politicians will not remain idle if a company opposes favored legislation or enters the sphere of public debate. Firms need to walk a fine line between standing up for their values and eroding relationships with political leaders.



This is an important story, and if you're a reporter looking to know more or would like to schedule and interview with Professor Bird, then let us help. Click on his icon now to arrange an interview today.


Connect with:
Robert Bird

Robert Bird

Eversource Energy Chair in Business Ethics

Robert Bird is an expert in corporate compliance, employment law, legal strategy, business ethics, and corporate governance.

Corporate GovernanceEmployment LawBusiness LawCorporate ComplianceBusiness Ethics
Powered by

You might also like...

Check out some other posts from University of Connecticut

Tick Population Surge Raises New Lyme Disease Concerns featured image

2 min

Tick Population Surge Raises New Lyme Disease Concerns

A surge in tick activity across Connecticut is renewing concerns about Lyme disease, prompting experts to examine the environmental factors driving tick populations, the challenges of prevention, and the future role of vaccines. Recently reported by CT Community News and CTNewsJunkie, researchers are seeing unusually high numbers of ticks infected with the bacteria that causes Lyme disease, with infection rates reaching levels typically not observed until peak season. Experts point to a combination of environmental conditions, including a snowy winter that insulated overwintering ticks, milder seasonal temperatures, and continued residential expansion into wooded areas where ticks thrive. According to Dr. David Banach, an infectious disease specialist and epidemiologist at UConn Health, the increase in Lyme disease cases is influenced by multiple factors. While improved reporting may account for some of the rise, environmental conditions continue to play a significant role in the number of infections seen by clinicians each year. “Lyme disease is chronically underreported.” Dr. David Banach Dr. David Banach is an infectious diseases physician who leads UConn Health's Infection Prevention Program and serves as hospital epidemiologist. View his profile The article also explores ongoing efforts to develop new Lyme disease vaccines. Dr. Paulo Verardi, head of UConn's Department of Virology and Vaccinology, notes that vaccines could become an important tool in reducing disease risk, but cautions that vaccination alone will not solve the broader challenge posed by expanding tick populations and changing environmental conditions. Effective control, he argues, will require a combination of public education, land management, and efforts to reduce tick abundance. “To really control tickborne diseases, there needs to be more land management, public education and a drop in the overall tick population.” Dr. Paulo Verardi Dr. Paulo Verardi is a virologist who specializes in vaccine research and development. He is a Department Head and Associate Professor at UConn and a member of the Center of Excellence for Vaccine Research. View his profile As Lyme disease continues to spread across North America, understanding the intersection of climate, ecology, public health, and vaccine development is becoming increasingly important. Researchers are working to better understand why tick populations are expanding, how disease risk is changing, and what strategies can best protect people who live, work, and spend time outdoors. Covering Lyme or other tickborne diseases? We can help. To learn more about Lyme disease, tick-borne illnesses, vaccine development, infectious disease trends, and public health preparedness, connect with experts such as Dr. David Banach and Dr. Paulo Verardi, whose research and expertise help explain the growing challenges posed by tick-borne diseases.

Expert Insight: The ‘100 Deadly Days of Summer’ featured image

3 min

Expert Insight: The ‘100 Deadly Days of Summer’

A recent article in the Hartford Courant examining a sudden increase in fatal crashes across Connecticut has transportation safety experts sounding the alarm as the busy summer travel season begins. The story featured Eric Jackson, executive director of the Connecticut Transportation Institute and director of the Connecticut Transportation Safety Research Center, who noted that 16 roadway fatalities were recorded in just nine days — a significant increase that quickly narrowed what had been a year-over-year decline in traffic deaths. Jackson points to a combination of warmer weather, longer days, increased travel, and more vulnerable road users on the road as factors that contribute to what safety professionals often call the "100 Deadly Days of Summer" between Memorial Day and Labor Day. He also warns that motorcycle fatalities may continue to rise as more riders return to the roads, particularly amid higher fuel prices. For journalists covering traffic safety, transportation trends, infrastructure, or public policy, Jackson offers valuable insight into the data, behaviors, and seasonal factors influencing roadway fatalities. The latest data released by the University of Connecticut Crash Repository — which tracks fatal crashes throughout the year — shows that 16 fatalities were reported on Connecticut’s roads between May 10 and May 19, when the numbers were last updated. That many fatal crashes in that short of a time span is a “huge” number and one that “we usually don’t see,” said Dr. Eric Jackson, a research professor at UConn. The overall number of traffic fatalities is still down across the state compared to the same time last year, but the gap has shrunk drastically in the last few weeks, according to Jackson, who serves as the executive director of the Connecticut Transportation Institute and the director of the Connecticut Transportation Safety Research Center. As of May 10, there were 64 traffic deaths reported in 2026 compared to 78 at the same time last year. The most recent data shows that 80 fatal crashes have now been reported so far this year, compared to 83 at the same time in 2025. One potential reason for the drastic uptick in fatalities could be the increased activity that goes along with warmer weather and longer days. “People are out and about more,” Jackson said. During the first several months of the year, cold weather and a number of winter storms could have contributed to keeping many people inside and slowing down those who did go out, Jackson speculated. “Snowstorms, huge weather events usually prevent fatalities because people aren’t driving as fast,” he said.   The trend is especially concerning as higher fuel prices have more people looking to motorcycles as a way to get around in better weather while reducing their fuel consumption. Nine riders have died in Connecticut in the past few weeks, leading some local news outlets to ask: Are high gas prices fueling a rise in deadly motorcycle crashes? Looking to know more?  We can help. Connect with Eric Jackson to discuss seasonal traffic safety trends, motorcycle safety, transportation data analysis, and strategies to reduce roadway fatalities.

How Worried Should We Be About Hantavirus? featured image

2 min

How Worried Should We Be About Hantavirus?

An outbreak of an uncommon but not unheard-of illness is responsible for the deaths of at least three people who were on an international cruise ship. With the rest of the passengers and crew under observation in their home countries — including 18 Americans who went to a quarantine facility at the University of Nebraska — how worried do we need to be about hantavirus? Dr. David Banach, UConn Health infectious diseases physician and hospital epidemiologist, joins Dr. Anthony Alessi to explain what we’re dealing with, the public health implications, and how, unlike COVID, the medical community at least has some history with this virus. You can check out the podcast here: It doesn’t spread in the same way that COVID does, in the sense that there’s no established sort of asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic spread. — Dr. David Banach Dr. Banach explains that hantavirus is a rare but serious virus carried primarily by rodents and spread through exposure to rodent waste or contaminated environments. While most cases are isolated, clusters can occasionally occur. The discussion compares hantavirus to COVID-19, with Dr. Banach emphasizing that hantavirus spreads much less easily between humans and is therefore less likely to become a global pandemic. However, it can cause severe cardiopulmonary illness with a significantly higher mortality rate than COVID. There is currently no vaccine or specific antiviral treatment, meaning care is largely supportive for patients who become critically ill. Dr. Banach also addresses public anxiety and misinformation surrounding the outbreak, encouraging people to rely on trusted organizations such as the World Health Organization and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for accurate information. He notes that public health officials continue to closely monitor the situation, but at this stage the overall risk to the general public remains low. Interested in learning more? Simply click on Dr. Banach's icon to arrange a time to talk today.

View all posts
Powered by