A Big Week in the Measurement of Expertise: How the UK Research Excellence Framework (REF) Results Will Impact Universities

May 9, 2022

4 min

Justin Shaw

How should we measure faculty expertise? This week the UK provides its answer to this question via its highly significant and formal (government-directed) assessment of academic research - which grades academic teams on a scale of 1* to 4* for their ability to deliver, share and create impact globally outstanding research.


This process is known as the REF (the Research Excellence Framework) - and the results will be publicly released this Thursday (12th May) with universities themselves finding out how they’ve performed in advance today (Monday 9th May). The process was last carried out 8 years ago and has been delayed by a year due to the pandemic.



Why is the Research Excellence Framework (REF) Significant?


The Research Excellence Framework steers the level of UK public funds - allocated via research councils - that will be invested in research for each academic department (or so-called “Unit of Assessment”) for the next few years. It is also a way of comparing performance against other universities that are offering similar research expertise, and of strengthening (or weakening) global research reputations.


During the next three days, UK universities will be digging into the detail of their REF gradings and the accompanying feedback. There will be some very nervous university leaders and research heads delving into why this peer-assessed review of their research has not gone as well as they expected and why their percentages in each of the four grade areas have dropped - or even been given the “unclassified” career-damaging stamp.


How are the REF Scores for Universities Determined?


The measurement process is based on three aspects:


  1. Quality of outputs (such as: publications, performances, and exhibitions),
  2. Impact beyond academia
  3. The environment that supports research


The preparation, participation, and assessment process takes a massive amount of time, attention and energy. Last time (2014) there were 1,911 submissions to review. Research teams, designated REF leaders and senior staff will have spent long hours across many months preparing their submissions and making sure they are presenting hard evidence and the best case possible to meet the above criteria at the highest possible level. There are 34 subject areas that are covered in the latest REF - and three tiers of expert panels (some with about 20 or more senior academics, international subject leaders, and research users) will have reviewed each submission and compared notes to come to decisions.


How do these Key Categories within the REF Contribute to the Rating for a University?


The Research Excellence Framework is actually an intensive and highly important approach to expert assessment. These are the key factors and their definitions (with the assigned weighting of each of the criteria in steering final grades):


  1. Outputs (60%): the quality of submitted research outputs in terms of their ‘originality, significance and rigour’, with reference to international research quality standards. This element will carry a weighting of 60 per cent in the overall outcome awarded to each submission.
  2. Impact (25%): the ‘reach and significance’ of impacts on the economy, society, culture, public policy or services, health, the environment or quality of life that were underpinned by excellent research conducted in the submitted unit. This element carries a weighting of 25 per cent.
  3. Environment (15%): the research environment in terms of its ‘vitality and sustainability’, including the approach to enabling impact from its research, and its contribution to the vitality and sustainability of the wider discipline or research base. This element accounts for 15 per cent.


Taking a Closer Look at the Categories - Are We Focusing Enough on Research Impact?


In 2014 a formal review was carried out in order to improve and evolve the REF process which made a number of recommendations. Most notably the weighting for “impact” was increased by five percent, with “outputs” being reduced by the same percentage. This is certainly a recognition that the external contribution difference that research makes is more important - but is it enough? Should there be greater emphasis on the return on investment from a beneficiaries and user experience perspective?


Many argue that academic research should retain a strong element of ‘”blue sky” experimentation - where outright evidence of impact may take several years (even decades) and so can’t demonstrate such immediate value.


A particularly notable benefit of the timing of the COVID-19 pandemic and the effect of this in REF deadlines has allowed the extended assessment period for ‘proof of impact’ from 1 August 2013 to 31 December 2020. This is an extension from the previous end date of 31 July 2020. The extension has been put in place to enable case studies affected by, or focusing on the response to, COVID-19 to be assessed in REF 2021.


Going back to the original question: how should we measure faculty expertise? It will be interesting to monitor the views and responses of university leaders and faculty members at the end of this week as to whether they feel that - standing back from it all - this UK-centric method of measurement is the best that can be done, a neat compromise or isn’t really what we really need.


For more information on the Research Excellence Framework visit www.ref.ac.uk/


Justin Shaw

Justin is UK and Ireland Development Director for ExpertFile and Chief Higher Education Consultant at Communications Management. An authority on University strategy and communications, he has worked in and with leadership teams at UK universities for over 30 years. In his role he has advised universities on how to promote their expertise and on communications strategies related to the REF.


Connect with:
Justin Shaw

Justin Shaw

Chief Higher Education Consultant (Communications Management) and UK Development Director

Specialist in higher education, communications, reputation and marketing of academic experts

You might also like...

Check out some other posts from ExpertFile

1 min

Navigating the Higher Ed Noise

In 2025, higher education institutions face a perfect storm: shrinking budgets, increasing government scrutiny, widespread misinformation, and growing public skepticism. For marketing and communications professionals, the stakes have never been higher. Key Challenges Cuts to Research Funding Increasing Government Oversight & Regulation Economic Uncertainty & Budget Strains Misinformation & Disinformation 2025 will test how well universities can communicate their value to an increasingly complex world. The Decoder Guide is a smart, timely resource for higher ed leaders ready to rise to that challenge —offering practical, proactive steps to improve transparency, trust, and engagement. DOWNLOAD THE GUIDE HERE (no signup required) Upcoming Speaking Events June 8 IABC World Conference, Vancouver “The Thought Leadership Blueprint: Why & How to Build a High-Impact Program” Register Here Sept. 12-13 PRSA East Central Conference, Cleveland “The New Comms Leadership Skillset” Register Here About ExpertFile ExpertFile is revolutionizing how organizations connect their experts to journalists, podcasters, and conference organizers who need to find credible experts on tight deadlines…fast. Featuring experts on over 50,000 topics, our free Apple and Android mobile app is the go-to resource for journalists at media outlets such as the New York Times, CNN, NPR Radio, Fox News, BBC, The Guardian, ABC News, CBC, AXIOS and Time Magazine. For over a decade, our award-winning software platform has been helping marketing departments better manage and promote their online thought leadership to reach a wider audience. Clients include Carnegie Mellon University, ChristianaCare Health, Villanova University, Aston University and Emory University. Learn more at: expertfile.com/getstarted

2 min

The History of Conclave and How Do They Pick a New Pope?

The papal conclave—the centuries-old process by which the Roman Catholic Church selects a new pope—is one of the most secretive and spiritually symbolic events in the world. Rooted in rich ritual and guided by strict protocols, the conclave represents a moment of global significance, not only for the 1.3 billion Catholics worldwide but for all who follow the influence of religion on world affairs. This topic matters to the public as it blends ancient tradition with contemporary global leadership questions, shedding light on how faith, power, and governance intersect. The election of a pope impacts international diplomacy, interfaith relations, and moral discourse on modern issues. Key story angles that may interest a broad audience include: Origins of the papal conclave: Tracing its development from medieval times to its formalization by Pope Gregory X in 1274. The voting process: Exploring the steps from the Sistine Chapel seclusion to the smoke signals that announce a new pontiff. The role of the College of Cardinals: Examining who the electors are, how they are chosen, and the geopolitical makeup of the voting body. Influence of modern issues on papal selection: Understanding how social, environmental, and political concerns may shape cardinal deliberations. Global reaction to papal succession: Looking at how nations, religious groups, and the public respond to the announcement of a new pope. Symbolism and tradition: Analyzing the vestments, rituals, and centuries-old customs that surround the conclave and papal inauguration. Connect with an expert about the Papal Conclave: To search our full list of experts visit www.expertfile.com

1 min

Easter and different ways it is celebrated around the world

Easter, one of the most widely observed holidays around the world, carries deep religious, cultural, and seasonal significance. While rooted in Christian beliefs about resurrection and renewal, Easter’s origins also intersect with ancient springtime rituals and diverse regional customs. Its observance today varies greatly—from solemn liturgies to vibrant festivals and public holidays—offering rich opportunities to explore faith, tradition, and identity across cultures. As interest in global connectivity and interfaith understanding grows, Easter serves as a lens through which to examine broader questions of cultural expression and shared human experience. Journalists may find compelling story angles in topics such as: The religious roots of Easter and how they connect to ancient pagan spring festivals Diverse Easter traditions around the world—from egg rolling in the U.S. to Semana Santa processions in Spain The commercialization of Easter and its impact on modern observance How Easter is celebrated across different Christian denominations and interfaith communities The symbolism of rebirth and renewal across cultures and its relevance in today’s world The role of Easter in shaping seasonal food, fashion, and family rituals This holiday invites storytelling that spans continents and centuries, illuminating the ways tradition evolves while preserving meaning. Connect with an expert about Easter: To search our full list of experts visit www.expertfile.com

View all posts