Featured Post from CAA Club Group

MEDIA RELEASE: Provincial oversight of the towing industry now in effect in Ontario

Jan 2, 2024

3 min

Teresa Di Felice


The Towing and Storage Safety and Enforcement Act, 2021 (TSSEA) came into effect in Ontario yesterday, giving consumers more certainty when it comes to towing services across the province.


Towing services were previously licenced at the municipal level, creating a confusing patchwork of rules and fees for consumers. Provincial oversight will help to ensure that the motoring public has a reliable, growing and reputable tow industry for years to come.


“CAA has been working for over a decade with stakeholders and government officials to achieve provincial regulation of the towing industry,” said Teresa Di Felice, assistant vice president, CAA South Central Ontario. “These changes will make a big difference for drivers, providing more confidence and certainty regardless of when or where they require support.”


CAA Members can still receive the same services they have come to know and trust. CAA towing services operate in compliance with the new rules in Ontario.


“Public awareness of the rules that are now in place is going to be a critical element of successfully protecting drivers moving forward,” continued Di Felice. “CAA will be doing our part to help educate drivers across the province.”



Some of the consumer protection requirements that will now be required for all towing services include:


  • Every tow truck operator and vehicle storage operator (company owner) must have a Certificate to offer services in the province of Ontario. Every tow truck must clearly display their name and TSSEA certificate number on the truck. You have the right to see a copy of the certificate.


  • You have the right to decide who can tow your vehicle and to what location unless otherwise directed by police.


  • Tow truck drivers must obtain consent BEFORE they tow your vehicle. Without signed consent (permission to tow form), the tow operator cannot charge for towing services. Towing consent is not required for membership or roadside assistance-type services.


  • You must be provided with an invoice BEFORE requesting payment and a receipt upon payment. This is not required for membership or roadside assistance-type services.


  • Rates cannot exceed the maximum rates published by the Ministry of Transportation.


  • Referrals to a business, facility or person can only be given if requested. Tow truck drivers and operators MUST disclose any benefit they receive for providing referrals to a person, business or facility.


  • Multiple payment methods must be accepted (cash, cheque, credit card, debit).


  • Towed vehicles must be transported via the most direct route. The tow operator or tow truck driver must notify the vehicle owner if taken to a different location from the one the vehicle owner specified.


  • Customers must be allowed to retrieve personal property from towed vehicles at no charge. Storage operators must allow authorized persons access to retrieve personal items from vehicles during business hours or prearranged times.


  • Tow operators must ensure every driver employed complies with TSSEA regulations, the Highway Traffic Act, and its regulations.


Implementation of regulations will continue to roll out in the months ahead, and it is expected that the final phase of regulations will be implemented starting in July 2024.


Connect with:
Teresa Di Felice

Teresa Di Felice

Assistant Vice President, Government and Community Relations

Teresa oversees CAA SCO's advocacy and community relations efforts in Ontario.

Community & Government RelationsRoad SafetyPolicy AdvocacyTowing RegulationCongestion Management

You might also like...

Check out some other posts from CAA Club Group

3 min

MEDIA RELEASE: CAA survey finds cannabis-impaired driving remains a concern in Manitoba

As 4/20 approaches, a survey conducted on behalf of CAA Manitoba reveals a trend: while most drivers in the province recognize the risks of cannabis-impaired driving, a significant number continue to drive after consuming cannabis—often in combination with other substances like alcohol or prescription medication. “Manitobans who decide to drive after consuming cannabis often underestimate the risks associated with this action,” said Ewald Friesen, manager, government relations, CAA Manitoba. “People still seem to believe that they have no alternative but to drive home or that the drive is short enough that it doesn’t matter. We are here to remind Manitobans that while cannabis use is legal and can be safely consumed, you should never do it before driving.”  Forty-seven per cent of Manitoba drivers used cannabis in 2024; 36 per cent tried cannabis this year for the first time since legalization. Despite growing awareness of the risks, 18 per cent of Manitoba drivers admit to driving after using cannabis, with the majority doing so within just three hours of consumption. Half of those surveyed are driving within three hours of consumption. The survey also revealed that 53 per cent of recent cannabis-impaired drivers reported driving shortly after consumption, with 36 per cent feeling high while behind the wheel. Alarmingly, 79 per cent expressed confidence in their driving ability while impaired, though 71 per cent expressed concern about being caught. “There is a common misconception on how cannabis affects drivers,” says Friesen, “however, it has been proven that cannabis use can impact a driver’s reaction time, judgement, coordination and decision-making.” Driving after consuming edibles has been a growing trend since last year. While smoking remains the primary mode of cannabis use, the survey highlights a growing trend of driving after consuming edibles, which can have delayed and unpredictable effects. Solid edibles (67 per cent) and joints (61 per cent) are the most used formats, and more than half of cannabis users prefer edibles over any other format. "Unlike other forms of cannabis, edibles often have delayed and unpredictable effects, which can significantly impair judgment and reaction times,” adds Friesen. “It is crucial for individuals to recognize these differences and prioritize safety, not only for themselves but for everyone sharing the road." There is a disconnect between what people believe and how they behave when it comes to cannabis and driving. Although 93 per cent of Manitoba drivers agree that cannabis-impaired driving is a serious road safety issue, many still view it as less dangerous than alcohol or prescription opioids. This disconnect between perception and behaviour underscores the need for continued education and enforcement. The penalties for impaired driving are serious and can include: • Immediate 24-hour licence suspension (up to 60 days pending further testing) • Three-day vehicle impoundment • A $400 fine • Mandatory Impaired Driver Assessment • Additional administrative penalties, ignition interlock program requirements, and possible charges under the Criminal Code of Canada CAA Manitoba encourages all motorists to make safe, informed choices: • Know the rules and understand how different cannabis products affect the body. • Don’t drive impaired—whether by cannabis, alcohol, or any combination of substances. • Plan ahead by arranging a rideshare, taxi, or designated driver, especially if planning to consume cannabis during upcoming events like 4/20. The online survey was conducted by DIG Insights from July 5 to July 18, 2024, with 504 Manitoba drivers aged 19 and older. Based on the sample size of n=504 and with a confidence level of 95%, the margin of error for this research is +/- 3%.) 

3 min

MEDIA RELEASE: Nominate now: the annual CAA Worst Roads campaign kicks off

The nomination portal for the annual CAA Worst Roads campaign is now open, and CAA South Central Ontario (CAA SCO) is giving Ontarians the opportunity to voice their concerns about the bad roads in their communities. “Our research shows that 85 per cent of Ontarians are concerned about the state of our roads,” says Teresa Di Felice, assistant vice president of government and community relations, CAA SCO. “The campaign has been a vital platform for Ontarians to nominate roads they believe need urgent attention. It allows Ontarians to drive positive change in their communities by amplifying their voices.” Survey Reveals High Cost of Vehicle Damage from Poor Roads According to a survey conducted by CAA SCO, nearly half of respondents have experienced vehicle damage because of poor roads. Eighty-one per cent pay out of pocket to repair their vehicle, only three per cent file a claim with their personal auto insurance, and nine per cent forego repairs altogether. Vehicle damage caused by potholes and poor road maintenance can range from $500 to over $2,000. The average repair by those surveyed cost $933, a significant $81 increase from 2024. “With the increasing cost of living, many people hold on to their cars for longer when damaged, the last thing they need is expensive repair bills on an already stretched household budget,” adds Di Felice. The survey also found that cracked pavement remains the most dominant road-related issue (88 per cent), followed by potholes (84 per cent) and congestion (81 per cent – up four per cent from 2024). One of the highest-climbing road-related issues Members reported is reduced or closed lanes, where 78 per cent of respondents agreed it is common in their region—up six per cent from last year. “The frustration from motorists is evident,” says Di Felice, “congestion continues to grow as one of the top road-related concerns for Ontarians, and the CAA Worst Roads campaign allows governments the insight into what repairs need to be prioritized for their communities.” More than half of respondents (64 per cent) also agreed that not enough is currently being done to maintain the roads in their area. Decision-Makers Respond to the Worst Roads Campaign “We know that the campaign works and that decision-makers are listening. Since the start of the campaign, we have seen budgets prioritized and road repairs moved up,” says Di Felice, “in the last four campaigns, we have seen ten roads receive attention because of their nomination in the CAA Worst Roads campaign.” Ontario’s top 10 list is verified by the Residential and Civil Construction Alliance of Ontario (RCCAO) and its members, including the Greater Toronto Sewer and Watermain Contractors Association (GTSWCA), Heavy Construction Association of Toronto (HCAT), and the Toronto and Area Road Builders Association (TARBA). Nominations for the Worst Roads campaign can be submitted online at www.caaworstroads.com from March 25 to April 18. Once the nominations are collected, CAA will reveal the top 10 worst roads in the province to the public. CAA conducted an online survey with 2,370 CAA SCO Members between January 6 to 14, 2025. Based on the sample size and the confidence level (95 per cent), the margin of error for this study was +/- 2 per cent.

3 min

MEDIA RELEASE: Nominate now: the annual CAA Worst Roads campaign kicks off

The 14th annual CAA Worst Roads Campaign is live and CAA Manitoba wants citizens to voice their concerns and nominate the roads they want to see fixed. “Our research shows that 96 per cent of Manitobans are concerned about the state of our roads,” says Ewald Friesen, manager government relations at CAA Manitoba, “the CAA Worst Roads campaign gives Manitobans a voice in highlighting the roads they believe are in need of repair which provides a valuable snapshot to decision-makers.” A recent survey conducted by CAA Manitoba found that more than half of respondents have experienced vehicle damage because of poor roads. Eighty per cent paying out of pocket to repair them – up ten per cent from last year, only five per cent filing a claim with MPI - down 11 per cent from 2024. Eight per cent of Manitobans forwent repairs altogether.  According to the survey, poor road conditions, especially potholes and sunken sewer grates, are causing significant vehicle damage and increasing out-of-pocket repair costs for drivers. “Many Manitobans are experiencing the effects of the rise in the cost of living, including having to delay vehicle repairs. This makes investing in our roads and infrastructure more crucial than ever,” says Friesen. “We understand that consumers are being cautious with their spending, and many choose to keep their cars longer instead of purchasing new ones and stretching an already strained family budget." The damage caused to a vehicle by hitting a pothole can cost anywhere from $300 to $6,000, depending on the make and model of the car. The survey found that almost half of respondents paid between $500 to $1,999 to repair their vehicle, with an average cost of $882. “CAA Worst Roads campaign is a platform that gives Manitobans an opportunity to speak up and helps the different levels of government understand what roads are pain points for their constituents,” says Friesen. “We know the campaign works because we see governments prioritize budgets and move up road repairs every year after appearing on the CAA Worst Roads list,” adds Friesen. “This includes last year’s winner, 18th Street in Brandon, where we saw a swift, coordinated response between the municipality and the province.” Manitobans can nominate any road for issues ranging from congestion, potholes, poor road signs and the timing of traffic lights to pedestrian and cycling safety.  “Nearly 60 per cent of those who have ever participated in the campaign believe that nominating a road could result in the repair of it,” shares Friesen, “CAA Manitoba is calling on all road users to nominate the roads they believe need attention to help make our roads safer and show decision-makers what roadway improvements are important to Manitobans.” Nominations for the Worst Roads campaign can be submitted online at www.caaworstroads.com starting March 18 until April 11. Once the nominations are collected, CAA Manitoba will compile a list of the top 10 worst roads in the province, which will be announced to the public. CAA conducted an online survey with 1,014 CAA Manitoba Members between January 6 to 14, 2025. Based on the sample size and the confidence level (95 per cent), the margin of error for this study was +/-3 per cent.

View all posts
Powered by