Featured Post from ExpertFile

How to create an engaging online presence for your experts at scale.

4 Focus areas to maximize impact... while minimizing time and resources.

May 7, 2025

8 min

Robert Carter
CaptionResizeWrap TextRemove


Tasked with creating or expanding how you promote your organization's experts? Delivering an engaging online presence is vital, yet scaling from a handful of experts to hundreds takes planning. While interesting content, modern layouts, and intuitive navigation are essential, the real test lies in managing and presenting the extensive knowledge each expert brings. What works for a few can become a complex, time-consuming, and costly endeavor as you attempt to scale to dozens or hundreds of experts and their content, leading to an underwhelming user experience and missed opportunities. These challenges are magnified as small marketing and digital teams face greater demands such as:


  • How do I create and maintain up-to-date content for all my experts?


  • How can I efficiently roll out this content across my website, beyond just the About Us/Team or Newsroom sections?


  • How can I best facilitate audience interaction with my content, leading to valuable opportunities for both my experts and my organization?


And perhaps most importantly…


  • How can I minimize the use of marketing and digital resources, as well as costs, in building and maintaining all this content?


Addressing these challenges requires a plan. The following highlights 4 areas to focus on when scaling your expert content to ensure an engaging user experience for your audience.

1. Create versatile content that’s engaging, timely, and relevant.


The foundational importance of the quality and versatility of your expert content in designing an optimal user experience cannot be overstated. According to a recent report from the Content Marketing Institute, the majority 52% of B2B marketers plan to increase their marketing spend in 2025 on “thought leadership content”. This underscores the necessity of making relevant, high-quality expert content the backbone of delivering engaging and intuitive interactions with your visitors.


CaptionResizeWrap TextRemove


Without this focus on content, it doesn’t matter how visually appealing your layouts are or how well structured your navigation, it won’t meet the needs of your audience. Expertly crafted content builds trust and credibility, as users perceive well-organized, comprehensive and authoritative information as a sign of a reputable organization with interesting and credible experts.


"Content precedes design. Design in the absence of content is not design, it’s decoration".


Jeffrey Zeldman - Renowned designer, author & speaker on web design.


Ultimately, the integration of high-quality, versatile content into UX design is essential for creating meaningful and effective digital experiences that meet and exceed your visitor’s expectations.


Keys to Scaling


  • Share the Workload: Make content creation and management easier by using a purpose-built system that streamlines content creation and updates, vs custom designed page or need to provide access to the core CMS. Ensure the system allows multiple team members, including the experts themselves, to easily access and manage their content, making the process quick and efficient.


  • Repurpose Existing Content Assets: According to the Content Marketing Institute, the failure to utilize pre-existing content is significant challenge (37%) impacting marketers' ability to scale. Leverage existing content assets, such as blog copy & imagery, and previously created videos, to enhance your expert content. This approach allows you to enrich your content without the need for expensive production, making the most of the resources you already have.
CaptionResizeWrap TextRemove


  • Leverage Your Content Elements Together or Individually: Each content element should enable visitors to explore deeper insights from experts. Linking profiles to embedded videos and insightful posts or showcasing other experts within your organization can offer new and diverse perspectives. This approach enhances user engagement and provides a richer, more interactive experience.



2. Start with a home base, then grow your footprint.


Creating a home base for your expert content, such as an "Expert Center" or "Speakers Bureau," within your website's newsroom or media section, or enhancing your "About Us" pages, can significantly elevate your organization's profile and improve user experience. This hub could also be tailored to highlight specific areas like "Research Expertise," depending on your primary audience—be it media, event organizers, or prospective clients. Establishing this destination for your expertise using a flexible integration option, not only provides a focal point for your owned content but also lays the groundwork for expanding your reach across your website. By categorizing and featuring your expert content strategically, you can engage a broader audience across various sections of your site.


"Your website’s content should act as a doorway. Land new visitors with compelling stories, then expand their engagement by guiding them to explore more relevant content tailored to their interests." 

Ann Handley, Chief Content Officer, MarketingProfs



Keys to Scaling


  • Establish & State Clear Objectives - Ensure you prominently state the goals of your initiative—whether it’s combating fake news, serving the community, or showcasing your organization's breadth of expertise. Clearly outline the types of inquiries you’re seeking to attract. This transparency not only sets expectations but also aligns visitors with your mission, fostering trust and engagement.


  • Invest in Fresh Content - To keep your expert content hub dynamic and engaging, continually invest in new content. Regularly feature new experts and insights to encourage visitors to bookmark and frequently visit your site. Implementing a centralized, multi-access platform for content updates will streamline this process, making it scalable and sustainable.


  • Link to Related Content - Utilize your expert content hub as a gateway to other areas of your website. Create links to related content, such as research initiatives, to help visitors explore and engage with your broader expertise. This not only enhances the user experience but also maximizes the value and reach of your content across your site.



3. Always be thinking about Discoverability


Creating expert content—from compelling profiles to thought leadership—is only valuable if it’s easy to find. If visitors can’t quickly locate the expertise they need, frustration sets in and user experience suffers. To make expert content truly effective, it must be optimized for search engines, clearly organized, and internally linked. This is especially important for audiences like media, event organizers, and potential clients who rely on quick access to credible information. Prominently featuring and properly tagging expert content boosts visibility, builds authority, and drives meaningful engagement.


Keys to Scaling


  • Homepage/Top-Level Navigation: Don’t rely solely on a menu option or link buried in a subsection like your Newsroom. Featuring menu items, graphics, and other call-outs on your homepage and main section pages will increase interaction and inquiries.
CaptionResizeWrap TextRemove


  • Leverage Distribution Networks: Drive traffic to your expert content by promoting your experts and their insights on platforms like LinkedIn, Twitter, and expert-specific search engines like expertfile.com or mobile expert directory apps.


  • Add Free-Form Google-Like Search: Provide visitors with a free-form search experience that encompasses all elements of your expert content, rather than just a series of tags, titles, and names.


  • Ensure All Metadata is Available: Let Google do the heavy lifting by ensuring you have properly structured metadata and schema data for each piece of expert content. While most digital teams remember standard title and description metadata, powerful schema data that helps Google understand the context and authority of the content is often overlooked.


  • Add Links to Common Recurring Communications: Leverage all your communication channels, including adding links to your About Us section in press releases and individual experts’ email footers.




4. Plan for your Success


It is important to plan for the success of your Expertise Marketing program. A successful program will not only deliver valuable opportunities, helping drive reputation and revenue, but can also place increased demands on your marketing and digital teams, as well as your experts themselves. Your success will likely inspire interest from other experts or departments for inclusion in your program, necessitating tools and defined processes for efficient onboarding of new experts and integrations across your website. Equally important is managing the influx of inquiries from key audiences such as the media, event organizers, and prospective clients in a way that provides a seamless user experience and encourages repeat engagement. Addressing these challenges with a strategic approach will lay a solid foundation for a robust and scalable expertise marketing initiative.


Keys to Scaling


  • Inquiry Workflow: Putting a general email or phone # as a contact does not scale. Implementing an efficient inquiry workflow is essential for the success of your expertise marketing. This process starts by ensuring that inquiries from key audiences—such as media, event organizers, and potential clients—are promptly and accurately directed to the appropriate experts within your organization. An automated system can streamline this process by categorizing inquiries based on specific topics and routing them to the relevant experts, even filtering out unnecessary or harmful inquiries. This approach not only saves time but also ensures swift and professional responses, enhancing your organization's reputation and effectiveness.


  • Capture and Act on Analytics: Continually monitoring your analytics is crucial for refining your content strategy. By analyzing which types of content and which experts resonate most with your audience, you can better plan future content creation and decide who to feature prominently. This data-driven approach allows you to tailor your expertise marketing efforts more effectively, ensuring that you consistently engage your audience and meet their needs.


  • Share Your Success - By sharing your experts' achievements both within and outside your organization, you create a culture of recognition and aspiration. This not only encourages additional departments and experts to join your program but also enhances the overall value of your expert center. Expanding your program to include more experts and additional expert content transforms your website into a valuable destination for key audiences such as media, event organizers, and potential clients. Effective dissemination of success stories amplifies your reach, reinforces your organization’s credibility, and drives sustained engagement and growth.


Successfully scaling your Expertise Marketing program while maintaining an optimal user experience presents unique challenges. It requires producing versatile, high-quality content that is consistently engaging and relevant. Establishing a centralized home base for this content, such as an "Expert Center," helps streamline navigation and enhance user interaction. Improving discoverability through effective SEO and internal linking ensures that your expert content is easily accessible to key audiences like media and event organizers. Finally, meticulous planning for content updates and inquiry workflows is essential to manage resources efficiently and sustain growth. By addressing these areas strategically, you can build a robust and scalable Expertise Marketing initiative that drives engagement and reinforces your organization's reputation.




About ExpertFile


ExpertFile is changing the way organizations tap into the power of their experts to drive valuable inquiries, accelerate revenue growth, and enhance their brand reputation. Used by leading corporate, higher education and healthcare clients worldwide, our award-winning platform helps teams structure, manage and promote their expert content while our search engine features experts on over 50,000+ topics.


Download our "Guide to Expertise Marketing", book a demo and more here.

Connect with:
Robert Carter

Robert Carter

Co-Founder & VP Product

Focussed on delivering innovation that unlocks the hidden expertise within all organizations.

Brand DevelopmentReputation ManagementMarketing CommunicationsExpertise MarketingMarket Research

You might also like...

Check out some other posts from ExpertFile

2 min

Thanksgiving North and South: Why Canada and the U.S. Celebrate at Different Times

Every fall, both Canadians and Americans gather around the table to give thanks — but they do it more than a month apart. While the two holidays share themes of gratitude, harvest, and togetherness, they evolved under distinct historical, cultural, and seasonal circumstances that reflect each nation’s story. A Canadian Harvest of Thanks Canada’s Thanksgiving traces its roots back to 1578, when English explorer Martin Frobisher held a ceremony in Newfoundland to give thanks for safe passage across the Atlantic. Over time, the holiday blended European harvest traditions with local customs, emphasizing gratitude for the year’s bounty rather than a single historic event. Because Canada’s growing season ends earlier than in most of the United States, Thanksgiving naturally became an autumn harvest celebration held in early October. It was officially recognized in 1957, when Parliament declared the second Monday of October as a national holiday “to give thanks for the harvest and the blessings of the past year.” The American Tradition South of the border, Thanksgiving carries a different historical symbolism. The U.S. holiday traces back to 1621, when Pilgrims and the Wampanoag people shared a harvest feast in Plymouth, Massachusetts. While similar in spirit, the American version became tied more closely to the nation’s founding mythology — a story of cooperation, survival, and gratitude in the New World. Because harvests occur later in the U.S., the celebration naturally took place in late November. In 1863, during the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln proclaimed Thanksgiving a national holiday to promote unity, setting it for the final Thursday in November. Congress later standardized the date to the fourth Thursday in 1941. Seasons, Stories, and Shared Spirit At heart, both Thanksgivings mark the same human instinct: to pause, reflect, and give thanks. Canada’s October observance reflects the rhythm of northern harvests and a gratitude rooted in nature’s cycle. The American holiday, coming later in November, intertwines with its own national narrative of endurance and unity. Despite the calendar gap, the spirit is shared — families gathering to celebrate abundance, resilience, and community, in traditions that continue to evolve on both sides of the border. Connect with our experts on the history, traditions, and cultural meanings of Thanksgiving in North America. Check them out here : www.expertfile.com

2 min

The History of Government Shutdowns in America

Few events capture Washington gridlock more visibly than a government shutdown. While rare in the nation’s early history, shutdowns have become a recurring feature of modern politics—bringing uncertainty for federal workers, disruptions to public services, and ripple effects across the economy. How It Started The modern shutdown era began in the 1970s after a new law, the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974, established a formal budget process. Before then, funding disputes didn’t usually halt operations. But a key shift came in 1980, when the Carter administration’s Justice Department concluded that, without approved appropriations, agencies had no legal authority to spend money. That ruling set the stage for shutdowns as we know them today. Since then, the U.S. has endured more than 20 funding gaps, ranging from brief lapses over a weekend to the record-long 35-day shutdown of 2018–2019. Each one has highlighted the partisan battles over federal spending, immigration, healthcare, or other policy priorities. Why They Happen Shutdowns occur when Congress fails to pass, and the president fails to sign, appropriations bills or temporary funding measures known as continuing resolutions. In practice, they reflect deeper political standoffs: one branch of government using the threat of a shutdown to force concessions on controversial issues. They can be triggered by disputes over budget size, specific programs, or broader ideological fights. In many cases, the standoff ends when mounting political and economic costs make compromise unavoidable. What Gets Impacted The effects of a shutdown are immediate and wide-ranging: Federal Workforce: Hundreds of thousands of employees are furloughed without pay, while others deemed “essential” must work without immediate compensation. Public Services: National parks close, permits stall, museums shutter, and routine government operations—from food inspections to scientific research—are delayed. Economic Ripple Effects: Contractors lose revenue, local economies near federal facilities take a hit, and financial markets often react nervously. Extended shutdowns can even slow GDP growth. Citizens’ Daily Lives: From delayed tax refunds to halted small business loans, ordinary Americans feel the squeeze when government services pause. Why This Matters Government shutdowns are more than political theater—they expose the fragility of the budget process and the real consequences of partisan impasse. They highlight the dependence of millions of Americans on public services and raise questions about the cost of dysfunction in the world’s largest economy. Understanding why they happen and what’s impacted helps citizens gauge not just the politics of Washington, but also how governance—or the lack of it—touches everyday life. Connect with our experts about the history, causes, and consequences of government shutdowns in America. Check out our experts here : www.expertfile.com

8 min

University Communications Needs a Bigger Role in the Research Conversation

While attending the Expert Finder Systems International Forum (EFS), several notable themes emerged for me over the 2-day event. It's clear that many universities are working hard to improve their reputation by demonstrating the real-world impact of their research to the public and to funders, but it's proving to be a challenging task - even for the largest R1 universities.  Many of these challenges stem from how institutions have traditionally organized their research functions, management systems, and performance metrics.  Engaging faculty researchers in this process remains a significant challenge, despite the need for rapid transformation. While this EFS conference was very well-organized and the speakers delivered a great deal of useful information, I appeared to be one of the few marketing and communications professionals in a room full of research leaders, administrative staff, librarians, and IT professionals. There's a certain irony to this, as I observe the same phenomenon at HigherEd marketing conferences, which often lack representation from research staff.  My point is this. We can't build better platforms, policies, and processes that amplify the profile of research without breaking down silos.  We need University Communications to be much more involved in this process. As Baruch Fischhoff, a renowned scholar at Carnegie Mellon University, notes: Bridging the gap between scientists and the public “requires an unnatural act: collaboration among experts from different communities” – but when done right, it benefits everyone.  But first, let's dive in a little more into RIM's and Expert Finder Systems for context. What are Research Information Systems (RIMs) Research Information Management systems (aka Expert Finder Systems) are the digital backbone that tracks everything researchers do. Publications, grants, collaborations, patents, speaking engagements. Think of them as massive databases that universities use to catalog their intellectual output and demonstrate their research capacity.  These systems matter. They inform faculty promotion decisions, support strategic planning and grant applications, and increasingly, they're what institutions point to when asked to justify their existence to funders, accreditors, and the public. But here's the problem: most RIM systems were designed by researchers, for researchers, during an era when academic reputation was the primary currency. The game has fundamentally changed, and our systems haven't caught up. Let's explore this further. Academic Research Impact: The New Pressure Cooker Research departments across the country are under intense pressure to demonstrate impact—fast. State legislators want to see economic benefits from university research. Federal agencies are demanding clearer public engagement metrics. Donors want stories, not statistics. And the general public? They're questioning whether their tax dollars are actually improving their lives. Yet some academics are still asking, “Why should I simplify my research? Doesn’t the public already trust that this is important?” In a word, no – at least, not like they used to. Communicators must navigate a landscape where public trust in science and academia is not a given.  The data shows that there's a lot of work to be done. Trust in science has declined and it's also polarized:. According to a Nov. 2024 Pew Research study, 88% of Democrats vs. 66% of Republicans have a great deal or fair amount of confidence in scientists; overall views have not returned to pre-pandemic highs and many Americans are wary of scientists’ role in policymaking. While Public trust in higher education has declined, Americans see universities having a central role in innovation. While overall confidence in higher education has been falling over the past decade, a recent report by Gallup Research shows innovation scores highest as an area where higher education helps generate positive outcomes. Communication is seen as an area of relative weakness for scientists. Overall, 45% of U.S. adults describe research scientists as good communicators, according to a November 2024 Pew Research Study. Another critique many Americans hold is the sense that research scientists feel superior to others; 47% say this phrase describes them well. The traditional media ecosystem has faltered:. While many of these issues are largely due to research being caught in a tide of political polarization fueled by a significant rise in misinformation and disinformation on social media, traditional media have faced serious challenges.  Newsrooms have shrunk, and specialized science journalists are a rare breed outside major outlets. Local newspapers – once a reliable venue for highlighting state university breakthroughs or healthcare innovations – have been severely impacted. The U.S. has lost over 3,300 newspapers since 2005, with closures continuing and more than 7,000 newspaper jobs vanished between 2022 and 2023 according to a Northwestern University Medill Report on Local News. Competition for coverage is fierce, and your story really needs to shine to grab a journalist's attention – or you need to find alternative ways to reach audiences directly.  The Big Message These Trends are Sending We can’t just assume goodwill – universities have to earn trust through clear, relatable communication. Less money means more competition and more scrutiny on outcomes. That's why communications teams play a pivotal role here: by conveying the impact of research to the public and decision-makers, they help build the case for why cuts to science are harmful. Remember, despite partisan divides, a strong majority – 78% of Americans – still agree government investment in scientific research is worthwhile. We need to keep it that way. But there's still a lot of work to do. The Audience Mismatch Problem The public doesn't care about your Altmetrics score. The policymakers I meet don't get excited about journal impact factors. Donors want to fund solutions to problems they understand, not citations in journals they'll never read. Yet our expert systems are still designed around these traditional academic metrics because that's what the people building them understand. It's not their fault—but it's created a blind spot. "Impact isn't just journal articles anymore," one EFS conference panelist explained. "It's podcasts, blogs, media mentions, datasets, even the community partnerships we build." But walk into most research offices, and those broader impacts are either invisible in the system or buried under layers of academic jargon that external audiences can't penetrate. Expert systems have traditionally been primarily focused on academic audiences. They're brilliant at tracking h-Index scores, citation counts, and journal impact factors. But try to use them to show a state legislator how your agriculture research is helping local farmers, or explain to a donor how your engineering faculty is solving real-world problems? There's still work to do here. As one frustrated speaker put it: "These systems have become compliance-driven, inward-looking tools. They help administrators, but they don't help the public understand why research matters. The Science Translation Crisis Perhaps the most sobering observation came from another EFS Conference speaker who said it very plainly. "If we can't explain our work in plain language, we lose taxpayers. We lose the community. They don't see themselves in what we do." However, this feels more like a communication problem masquerading as a technology issue. We've built systems that speak fluent academic, but the audiences we need to reach speak human. When research descriptions are buried in jargon, when impact metrics are incomprehensible to lay audiences, when success stories require a PhD to understand—we're actively pushing away the very people we need to engage. The AI Disruption Very Few Saw Coming Yes, AI, like everywhere else, is fast making its mark on how research gets discovered. One impassioned speaker representing a university system described this new reality: "We are entering an age where no one needs to click on content. AI systems will summarize and cite without ever sending the traffic back." Think about what this means for a lot of faculty research. If it's not structured for both AI discovery and human interaction, your world-class faculty might as well be invisible. Increasingly, you will see that search traffic isn't coming back to your beautifully designed university pages—instead, it's being "synthesized" and served up in AI-generated summaries. I've provided a more detailed overview of how AI-generated summaries work in a previous post here. Keep in mind, this isn't a technical problem that IT can solve alone. It's a fundamental communications challenge about how we structure, present, and distribute information about our expertise. Faculty Fatigue is Real Meanwhile, many faculty are experiencing serious challenges managing busy schedules and mounting responsibilities.  As another EFS panelist commented on the challenges of engaging faculty in reporting and communicating their research, saying, "Many faculty see this work as duplicative. It's another burden on top of what they already have. Without clear incentives, adoption will always lag." Faculty researchers are busy people. They will engage with these internal systems when they see direct benefits. Media inquiries, speaking opportunities, consulting gigs, policy advisory roles—the kind of external visibility that advances careers and amplifies research impact. And they require more support than many institutions can provide. Yet, many universities have just one or two people trying to manage thousands of profiles, with no clear strategy for demonstrating how tasks such as profile updates and helping approve media releases and stories translate into tangible opportunities. In short, we're asking faculty to feed a system that feels like it doesn't feed them back. Breaking Down the Silos Which brings me to my main takeaway: we need more marketing and communications professionals in these conversations. The expert systems community is focused on addressing many of the technical challenges—data integration, workflow optimization, and new metadata standards — as AI transforms how we conduct research. But they're wrestling with fundamental communication challenges about audience, messaging, and impact storytelling. That's the uncomfortable truth. The systems are evolving whether we participate or not. The public pressure for accountability isn't going away. Comms professionals can either help shape these systems to serve critical communications goals or watch our expertise get lost in translation. ⸻ Key Takeaways Get Closer to Your Research: This involves having a deeper understanding of the management systems you use across the campus. How is your content appearing to external audiences? —not just research administrators, but the journalists, policymakers, donors, and community members we're trying to reach. Don't Forget The Importance of Stories: Push for plain-language research descriptions without unnecessarily "dumbing down" the research. Show how the work your faculty is doing can create real-world benefits at a local community level. Also, demonstrate how it has the potential to address global issues, further enhancing your authority.  And always be on the lookout for story angles that connect the research to relevant news, adding value for journalists. Structure Expert Content for AI Discoverability: Audit your content to see how it's showing up on key platforms such as Google Gemini, ChatGPT. Show faculty how keeping their information fresh and relevant translates to career opportunities they actually care about. Show Up at These Research Events: Perhaps most importantly, communications pros need to be part of these conversations. Next year's International Forum on Expert Finder Systems needs more communications professionals, marketing strategists, and storytelling experts in the room. The research leaders, administrators and IT professionals you will meet have a lot of challenges on their plate and want to do the right thing.  They will appreciate your input. These systems are being rapidly redesigned - Whether you're part of the conversation or not. The question is: do we want to influence how they serve our institutions' communications goals, or do we want to inherit systems that work brilliantly for academic audiences but get a failing grade for helping us serve the public?

View all posts
Powered by